Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Rajasthan Sales Tax Rules, 1955

5 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

M/S. INDIAN HUME PIPE CO. LTD.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

2017 INSC 81728 August 2017Dismissed

Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd entered into a works contract with the Rajasthan Public Health and Engineering Department to supply and lay pre‑stressed cement concrete (PSC) pipes, valves and related materials, together with civil works. The company claimed exemption from sales tax under Section 7AA of the Rajasthan Sales Ta

SHRI DIGVIJAY CEMENT CO. ETC.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. ETC.

1997 INSC 30521 March 1997Leave Granted & Allowed

The appellants, Gujarat cement manufacturers, challenged three Rajasthan notifications that reduced the Central Sales Tax on inter‑state cement sales to 7% and later 4% and dispensed with the mandatory Form C declaration. They argued that the notifications were not issued in public interest, violated Articles 301, 302,

GANNON DUNKERLEY AND CO. A.ND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1992 INSC 31217 November 1992Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined appeals by Gannon Dunkerley Co. and other contractors challenging the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 and its rules which imposed tax on the transfer of property in goods used in works contracts. The Court held that Section 5(3) of the Act and sub‑rule (i) of Rule 29 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax

M/.S. GULJAG INDUSTRIESversusCOMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER

2007 INSC 8103 August 2007Disposed off

The case concerned several civil appeals arising from the imposition of penalty under Section 78(5) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 (in pari materia with Section 22A(7) of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954) for carrying goods in movement with blank Form ST‑18A/18C that had been signed but left incomplete. The Supr

ASSOCIATED CEMENT CO. LTD.versusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, KOTA & ORS.

1981 INSC 1572 September 1981Case Partly allowed

Associated Cement Co. Ltd., a cement manufacturer, filed its sales‑tax returns for 1973‑74 under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act and the Central Sales Tax Act without including freight charges, believing they were not taxable. After the Supreme Court in Hindustan Sugar Mills Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan held that freight for

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search