Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Rent Control Act

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

JHUMMAN SINGH AND ORS.versusCENTRAL BOARD OF INVESTIGATION AND ORS.

1995 INSC 23530 March 1995Case Allowed

The petitioners, tenants of four shops, alleged that the third respondent fraudulently obtained two court decrees from Gauhati and Gaya to evict them from their premises, purchasing the decrees and powers of attorney for a sum of rupees twenty thousand each. They sought a writ under Article 32 directing the CBI to inve

GANDHE VIJAY KUMARversusMULJI @ MULCHAND

2017 INSC 67827 July 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute involved a landlord‑tenant relationship where the Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority both held that the landlord satisfied the bonafide requirement under the Rent Control Act. The High Court, exercising revisional jurisdiction, set aside those findings, stating it could re‑appreciate the evidence t

MANISHA LALWANIversusD.V. PAUL

2009 INSC 6965 May 2009Disposed off

The High Court, in a rent‑control suit, passed a conditional decree directing the tenant to deposit Rs 10,000 in the trial court within four months, failing which the tenant would be evicted under Section 12(1) of the Rent Control Act. The tenant did not make the deposit and applied for an extension of time, prompting

PRAFUL MANOHAR RELEversusSMT. KRISHNABAI NARAYAN GHOSALKAR & ORS.

2014 INSC 33 January 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Praful Manohar Rele, sued the heirs of Narayan Keshav Ghosalkar for possession of a house, alleging that they occupied it as gratuitous licensees whose licence had been validly terminated. The defendants counter‑claimed that they were tenants and sought eviction under the Bombay Rent Act. The trial court

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search