Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6
The petitioner, Mohini alias Shankuntala Kalu Shetty, filed a writ petition challenging a lower court order that had refused to recast the issue in a landlord‑tenant suit. The original issue framed was whether the plaintiff proved he was the landlord of the premises comprising Shop Nos.1‑3 at Rane …
The petitioner, Arjun Vitthal, filed a writ petition challenging eviction orders issued under the Rent Control Act against him. During the hearing, the petitioner and Respondent No.3, Sangeetha Nirwani Chalwadi, presented a mutually agreed "Terms of Settlement/Consent Terms" and affirmed that the …
The dispute involved a landlord‑tenant relationship where the Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority both held that the landlord satisfied the bonafide requirement under the Rent Control Act. The High Court, exercising revisional jurisdiction, set aside those findings, stating it could …
The plaintiff, Praful Manohar Rele, sued the heirs of Narayan Keshav Ghosalkar for possession of a house, alleging that they occupied it as gratuitous licensees whose licence had been validly terminated. The defendants counter‑claimed that they were tenants and sought eviction under the Bombay Rent …
The High Court, in a rent‑control suit, passed a conditional decree directing the tenant to deposit Rs 10,000 in the trial court within four months, failing which the tenant would be evicted under Section 12(1) of the Rent Control Act. The tenant did not make the deposit and applied for an extension …
The petitioners, tenants of four shops, alleged that the third respondent fraudulently obtained two court decrees from Gauhati and Gaya to evict them from their premises, purchasing the decrees and powers of attorney for a sum of rupees twenty thousand each. They sought a writ under Article 32 …
