Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009

296 judgments · newest first · showing 201–296

PRATEEK MISHRA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged a Government Order dated 2 September 2026 and a related memorandum that authorised a Special Teacher Eligibility Test (Special TET) for in‑service teachers in Uttar Pradesh. They alleged that the order was ultra vires, diluted the standards prescribed by the National …

VASEEM AHAMAD AND 220 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, 221 Shiksha Mitras employed in primary schools of Uttar Pradesh, challenged a Government Order and notification dated September 2026 that instituted a Special Teacher Eligibility Test (Special TET) for in‑service teachers but expressly excluded them. They alleged that the exclusion …

VIJAY DNYANDEV KUNDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU SECRETARY AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged a series of Government Resolutions fixing the number and criteria for Laboratory Assistant posts in schools, alleging illegality, invalidity, and potential termination of their services. They sought a writ of mandamus to quash the resolutions and to direct the State to fix …

ARCHANA SUNIL GEETversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU SECRETARY AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged a series of Government Resolutions fixing the number and criteria for Laboratory Assistant posts in schools, alleging illegality, invalidity, and potential termination of their services. They sought a writ of mandamus to quash the resolutions and to direct the State to fix …

SWATI PRABHAKAR AHIREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU SECRETARY AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged a series of Government Resolutions (dated 28 January 2019, 1 March 2021, 26 March 2021 and 15 December 2025) that fixed the staffing pattern for Laboratory Assistant posts in schools, alleging the posts were surplus and that the resolutions were illegal, invalid and …

RAJENDRA BHASKARRAO SONAWANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU SECRETARY AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners challenged a series of Government Resolutions (dated 28 January 2019, 1 March 2021, 26 March 2021 and 15 December 2025) that fixed the staffing pattern for Laboratory Assistant posts in schools, alleging the posts were surplus and that the resolutions were illegal, invalid and …

Ranjana Yogesh JadhavversusPrincipal Secretary School Education Department

Disposed Off

The petitioner, a single mother belonging to the Dhangar Nomadic Tribe, applied for admission of her daughter Arohee under the Right to Education (RTE) quota. The Taluka Level Scrutiny Committee rejected the application because the father’s caste certificate was not produced, despite the mother’s …

MANIYAR ILIYAZ @ SHAIK RIYAZ & ANR.versusP. AYYAPPAN & ORS.

2026 INSC 647Disposed off

The appellant, a father, lost his five‑year‑old son when a tanker struck the boy as they walked to school on a road that had no footpath or pedestrian crossing. The father filed a claim for Rs 25,00,000 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, which awarded Rs 7,82,000 with interest; the High …

PADAM MEHTA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS

2026 INSC 476Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants filed a public interest litigation seeking the inclusion of the Rajasthani language in the syllabus of the Rajasthan Eligibility Examination for Teachers (REET) 2021 and the use of Rajasthani as a medium of instruction in schools. The High Court dismissed the petition, holding that a …

NAFEES AHMAD ANSARIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Nafees Ahmad Ansari challenged an order dated 12‑04‑2026 that deputed him to Census 2027 training and duty despite his representation seeking exemption on personal hardship grounds. He argued that the order violated Section 27 of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, …

Priyanka SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …

Baby KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …

Ramita KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher Rules (2006, 2008) who were placed on merit lists, later appointed by District Appellate Authorities after vacancies arose in 2012‑2017, but were denied salaries. The State appealed, …

Prem Prakash DubeyversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …

NikuversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …

Meera Kumari @ Mira KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …

NoorainversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …

Arjun Kumar ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …

Sharwan KumarversusThe State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary,

DISMISSED

The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …

Fulmati ShawversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …

AYAZBHAI AMIRBHAI GHANCHIversusDISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER , AHMEDABAD

27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

The petitioner, Ayazbhai Amirbhai Ghanchi, filed a special civil application seeking a school of his choice for his child under the Right to Education (RTE) Act for the academic year starting June 2026. He later approached the court requesting permission to withdraw the petition so that he could …

AKHILESH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged Rule 8 of the Uttar Pradesh Subordinate Educational (Trained Graduate Grade) Service Rules, 1983 (as amended) on the ground that it failed to require a pass in the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) for appointment of Assistant Teachers to classes VI‑VIII, contrary to the NCTE …

Runa Devi,versusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, appointed as Assistant Teachers on compassionate grounds, were required to complete a Diploma in Elementary Education but were not given any opportunity to appear for the training examinations, unlike similarly situated teachers. Consequently, they were removed from service by Memo …

Rajiv KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Runa Devi (widow of a deceased teacher) and Rajiv Kumar, were appointed as Assistant Teachers on compassionate grounds and were required to complete a Diploma in Elementary Education (DE) training. Although other teachers were given multiple opportunities to appear for the training …

DINESH BIWAJI ASHTIKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2026 INSC 56

The petitioner, Dinesh Biwaji Ashtikar, sought admission for his children in a nearby unaided school under the 25% quota mandated by Section 12 of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, but the school refused and the High Court dismissed his writ on the ground that he had …

Dilip Kumar DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

A large group of primary school teachers petitioned the Patna High Court seeking promotion to Graduate Trained Teacher, to graduate teacher posts under the 50% quota, and to headmaster positions, invoking Rule 15(cha) of the Bihar Panchayat Teacher (Recruitment and Service Conditions) Rules, 2012 …

ANJUMAN ISHAAT-E-TALEEM TRUSTversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

2025 INSC 1063Directions issued

The Supreme Court examined whether the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) must be mandatory for teachers in minority educational institutions and for in‑service teachers appointed before the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act (RTE Act) came into force. The Court considered the …

SOUMEN PAUL & ORS.versusSHRABANI NAYEK & ORS.

2025 INSC 451Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the recruitment of assistant teachers in West Bengal primary schools, where the eligibility rule required a Diploma in Elementary Education (D.El.Ed.) as prescribed by the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE). Because the COVID‑19 pandemic delayed the 2020‑22 D.El.Ed. …

KOUSIK DAS & ORS.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

2025 INSC 448Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, who were in‑service elementary teachers as of 10 August 2017, completed an 18‑month Diploma in Elementary Education (D.El.Ed.) through NIOS under the NCTE’s ODL scheme and applied for recruitment under a 2022 West Bengal notification. The High Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s …

PARIMAL KUMAR & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.

2025 INSC 134Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, who had passed the Jharkhand Teacher Eligibility Test (JTET) under the 2022 Recruitment Rules, challenged a High Court order that allowed candidates who cleared the Central Teacher Eligibility Test (CTET) or neighbouring states' Teacher Eligibility Tests (STET) to participate in the …

ANJUM KADARI & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2024 INSC 831Disposed off

The Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004, which created a board to regulate standards, teacher qualifications and examinations in madrasas, was struck down by the Allahabad High Court on the ground that it violated secularism and Articles 14 and 21A of the Constitution. The petitioners …

JAIVEER SINGH AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND OTHERS

2023 INSC 1024Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned whether an 18‑month Diploma in Elementary Education (D.El.Ed.) delivered by the National Institute of Open Schooling (NIOS) through open and distance learning (ODL) could be treated as equivalent to the 2‑year D.El.Ed. required by the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) …

JANHIT ABHIYANversusUNION OF INDIA

2022 INSC 1175Disposed off

The Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019 amended Articles 15 and 16 of the Indian Constitution to empower the State to provide up to 10% reservation for 'economically weaker sections' (EWS) of citizens, excluding Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and the non-creamy layer of …

DIVYAversusTHE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR

2022 INSC 1108Disposed off

The appellant, a two‑year‑old girl, suffered near‑total loss of lower‑limb function in a 1998 motor‑vehicle accident and was later certified by a Medical Board as having almost 100% permanent disability. The Motor Vehicles Tribunal dismissed her claim on technical grounds, but the Madras High Court …

SATYAJIT KUMAR & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.

2022 INSC 785Case Partly allowed

The Governor of Jharkhand issued a 2016 notification reserving 100% of Class III and IV district‑level teaching posts for local residents of thirteen scheduled districts. This was challenged as violating Articles 14, 16(2), 16(3), 35 and the non‑obstante clause of Paragraph 5(1) of the Fifth …

MANIBEN MAGANBHAI BHARIYAversusDISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER DAHOD & ORS.

2022 INSC 473Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, Anganwadi workers and helpers employed under the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) scheme in Gujarat, sought gratuity benefits under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The Gujarat High Court’s Division Bench held that they were not employees and thus ineligible for …

G H RAJNEESH KUMAR PANDEY & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2021 INSC 689Directions issued

The petitioners, teachers with B.Ed. (Special) and D.Ed. (Special) qualifications, sought a mandamus directing the Union and State governments to appoint regular special teachers for children with special needs (CwSN) in accordance with a 1:5 pupil‑teacher ratio. The Court examined the interplay of …

GEO VARGHESEversusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.

2021 INSC 618Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a Physical Training Teacher, was charged under Section 306 IPC for alleged abetment of his student’s suicide, based on an FIR alleging harassment and insult. The High Court dismissed the appellant’s petition under Section 482 CrPC to quash the FIR, holding that the FIR disclosed a …

RAM SHARAN MAURYA AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 646Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined challenges to the Uttar Pradesh government's decision to fix minimum qualifying marks of 65% for General and 60% for reserved candidates in the 2019 Assistant Teacher Recruitment Examination (ATRE-2019) after the exam had been conducted, and to allow B.Ed. candidates to …

SANJAI KUMAR & ORS.versusDR. PRABHAT KUMAR ETC.

2019 INSC 1372Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined contempt petitions filed by a group of assistant‑teacher candidates who alleged that the Uttar Pradesh government had failed to appoint them despite interim orders directing the appointment of all candidates who scored at least 70% (general) or 65% (reserved) in the …

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.versusTRILOK RAM

2019 INSC 1026Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Rajasthan advertised recruitment for Teacher Grade III (Level I & II) in 2013, requiring candidates to possess the prescribed qualifications as on the last date of application. Respondent Trilok Ram, who was still completing the mandatory B.S.T.C. qualification, applied based on a High …

OMKAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2019 INSC 765Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the eligibility criteria for the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) under the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) guidelines, specifically the meaning of the term “pursuing” in clause 5(ii). The petitioners, who had been appointed as Assistant Teachers while still …

STATE OF KERALA & ANR.versusMYTHRI VIDYA BHAVAN ENGLISH M. SCH. & ORS.

2018 INSC 441Dismissed

The State of Kerala challenged the High Court's order striking down two guidelines it had issued for granting No Objection Certificates (NOC) for CBSE affiliation: a minimum land requirement of three acres and a minimum enrolment of 300 students. The Supreme Court examined whether these requirements …

A. A. PADMANBHANversusTHE STATE OF KERALA & ORS.

2018 INSC 165Dismissed

The appellants, managers of private aided schools, challenged the Kerala government's decision to take over their schools under Section 15 of the Kerala Education Act, 1958, arguing that the schools had already been closed and that the provision conflicted with the Right to Fair Compensation and …

DISABLED RIGHTS GROUP & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2017 INSC 1244Directions issued

The Supreme Court heard a public‑interest writ filed by Disabled Rights Group seeking enforcement of reservation, accessibility and teaching‑facility provisions for persons with disabilities in higher education. The petitioners argued that institutions were not complying with the 3% reservation …

STATE OF U.P. & ANR. ETC.versusANAND KUMAR YADAV & ORS. ETC.

2017 INSC 668Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the Uttar Pradesh government's scheme of appointing 1.78 lakh "Shiksha Mitras" on a contractual basis and later attempting to regularise them as Assistant Teachers without meeting the statutory qualifications prescribed under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory …

RAM KUMAR PATEL & ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS. ETC.

2017 INSC 669Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined appeals filed by Ram Kumar Patel and others against the State of Uttar Pradesh challenging the High Court's order that quashed the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education (Teachers) Service (161st Amendment) Rules, 2012 on the ground of repugnancy with the National Council for …

NEERAJ KUMAR RAI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

2017 INSC 667Disposed off

The petitioners challenged the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) notification dated 29 July 2011 which made a 50% graduation mark mandatory for appointment of teachers, alleging arbitrariness and violation of Article 14 of the Constitution. They argued that earlier NCTE notification …

STATE OF U.P AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSHN KUMAR PATHAK AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

2017 INSC 666Disposed off

The State of Uttar Pradesh amended its Basic Education Rules to incorporate the National Council for Teachers Education (NCTE) qualifications for elementary teachers, later revoking the weightage given to Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) marks. A writ petition challenged the revocation, and the …

REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY & ORS.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2016 INSC 1016Disposed off

The case concerned the Tamil Nadu Government's decision to relax the qualifying marks in the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) by 5% for candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes, and other disadvantaged groups. The petitioners challenged the relaxation on …

VIKAS SANKHALA & ORS. ETC.versusVIKAS KUMAR AGARWAL & ORS. ETC.

2016 INSC 970Disposed off

The case concerned the validity of a policy issued by the State of Rajasthan on 23 March 2011 that relaxed the minimum passing marks in the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) for candidates belonging to reserved categories. General‑category candidates challenged the policy, arguing that the relaxation …

PRAMATI EDUCATIONAL & CULTURAL TRUST ® & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2014 INSC 362Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of clause (5) of Article 15 inserted by the Constitution (Ninety‑third Amendment) Act, 2005 and Article 21A inserted by the Constitution (Eighty‑sixth Amendment) Act, 2002. It held that neither amendment alters the basic structure of the …

STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.versusASSOCIATED MANAGEMENT OF (GOVERNMENT RECOGNISED ..:.. UNAIDED - ENGLISH MEDIUM) PRIMARY & SECONDARY SCHOOLS & ORS.

2014 INSC 360Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the Karnataka Government Order of 29‑April‑1994 that mandated mother‑tongue or Kannada as the medium of instruction in classes I‑IV of all government‑recognised schools. The Court clarified that ‘mother‑tongue’ in Art. 350A refers to the language of the linguistic minority …

THE STATE OF KARNATAKAversusTHE ASSOCIATED MANAGEMENT OF (GOVT. RECOGNIZED UNAIDED ENGLISH MEDIUM) PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS & ORS.

2013 INSC 441Matter referred to larger bench

The State of Karnataka appealed against the High Court's partial upholding of its 1994 Government Orders mandating mother‑tongue or Kannada as the medium of instruction in primary schools, which had been challenged by unaided English‑medium schools. The Supreme Court examined whether the State could …

PUBLIC UNION FOR CIVIL LIBERTIESversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.

2012 INSC 472Disposed off

The Public Union for Civil Liberties filed a public‑interest writ petition seeking enforcement of the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 and the rehabilitation of freed bonded labourers. The Supreme Court examined the persistent non‑compliance of several states and Union Territories with …

ENVIRONMENT & CONSUMER PROTECTION FOUNDATIONversusDELHI ADMINISTRATION & ORS.

2012 INSC 442Disposed off

The Environment & Consumer Protection Foundation filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking directions to improve basic infrastructure in government, aided and locally‑run schools so that the right to free and compulsory education under Article 21A could be realised. While the petition was …

SOCIETY FOR UN-AIDED P.SCHOOL OF RAJASTHANversusU.O.I. & ANR.

2012 INSC 169Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, particularly sections 3, 12(1)(b) and 12(1)(c), which impose admission and fee‑reimbursement obligations on schools. The petitioners argued that these provisions infringed the …

MRS. SATIMBLA SHARMA AND ORS.versusST. PAULS SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL AND ORS.

2011 INSC 574Disposed off

The case concerned teachers of St. Paul's Senior Secondary School, a private unaided minority institution, who claimed that their salaries and allowances should be equal to those of teachers in government and government‑aided schools. The teachers argued that Article 14 and Article 39(d) of the …

STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.versusK. SHYAM SUNDER & ORS.

2011 INSC 555Dismissed

The Tamil Nadu government enacted the Uniform System of School Education Act, 2010 to introduce a common syllabus and textbooks for all schools, which was upheld by the High Court and the Supreme Court after certain provisions were struck down. After a change of government in 2011, the new …

BACHPAN BACHAO ANDOLANversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2011 INSC 307Hearing Adjourned

The Supreme Court entertained a public‑interest writ filed by Bachpan Bachao Andolan seeking protection for children employed in Indian circuses, who were subjected to physical, sexual and emotional abuse and denied education. The Court examined whether such employment violated the children’s …