Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950

20 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

DISTT. MANAGER, APSRTC, VIJAYAWADAversusK. SIVAJI AND ORS.

2000 INSC 55830 November 2000Appeal(s) allowed

The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC) employed workers who claimed wages for work performed on holidays declared under the Andhra Pradesh Factories and Establishments (National Festival and Other Holidays) Act, 1974. APSRTC contended that Section 11(1)(c) of that Act excluded it because it was an

CAPTAIN SUBE SINGH AND ORS.versusLT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI AND ORS.

2004 INSC 32930 April 2004Case Partly allowed

The appellants, private stage‑carriage operators, challenged a Delhi Government notification dated 31‑12‑1999 issued under Section 67 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which (i) raised the fees for using DTC bus shelters and terminals and (ii) made all DTC concessional passes binding on private operators. The Supreme Co

CALCUTTA STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL

1996 INSC 33829 February 1996Dismissed

The Calcutta State Transport Corporation (CSTC), a statutory body created under the Road Transport Corporations Act to provide road transport services, claimed that its income was exempt from tax under Section 10(20) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961, on the ground that it was a "local authority" as defined in Section 3(31)

MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORP.versusPREMLAL

2007 INSC 21827 February 2007Dismissed

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) and a trade union entered into an industrial settlement in 1956 (Clause 49) granting any employee who worked continuously for 180 days the benefits of a time‑scale worker. A later settlement in 1985 (Clause 19) provided for the absorption of daily‑rated workers a

U.P. ROADWAYS RETIRED OFFICIALS AND OFFICERS ASSOCIATIONversusSTATE OF U.P. & ANR.

2024 INSC 55526 July 2024Dismissed

The petitioners, former employees of Uttar Pradesh Roadways, claimed that they were entitled to pension after their absorption into the Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (UPSRTC). The issue was whether they ever held a pensionable post before or after absorption and whether members of the Roadways Karmchar

S.P. DUBEYversusM.P.S.R.T. CORPN. AND ANR.

1990 INSC 32223 October 1990Appeal(s) allowed

S.P. Dubey joined a private transport company in 1947 where the superannuation age was 60. The company was taken over by the Madhya Pradesh Government on 31 August 1955 with a notification assuring that existing staff would not be adversely affected in their terms of service. When the staff were transferred to the Madh

KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPN.versusK.O. VARGHESE AND ORS.

2003 INSC 24517 April 2003Disposed off

The Kerala State Road Transport Corporation (the Corporation) absorbed employees of the State Transport Department whose pension rights were protected under Section 34 of the Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 and were to be governed by Part III of the Kerala Service Rules, 1959 (KSR). The State Government, by a lett

S. GOVINDARAJUversusK.S.R.T.C. & ANR.

1986 INSC 7615 April 1986Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, selected as a conductor for the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, was appointed to a temporary vacancy and worked for more than 240 days. He was terminated under Regulation 10(5) of the Karnataka Road Transport Corporation (Cadre & Recruitment) Regulations 1982 on the ground of being unsuitable

V.V.G. REDDYversusAPSRTC, NIZAMABAD REGION & ANR.

2009 INSC 2513 January 2009Dismissed

V.V.G. Reddy, a bus conductor employed by the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, was dismissed following disciplinary proceedings. The Labour Court, on a consent award, ordered his reinstatement with continuity of service but expressly denied back wages and attendant benefits. Reddy sought notional increm

DIVISIONAL MANAGER, RAJASTHAN S.R.T.C.versusKAMRUDDIN

2009 INSC 79312 May 2009Appeal(s) allowed

Kamruddin, a bus conductor employed on probation by the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, was caught five times for not issuing tickets to passengers. After a warning, a disciplinary enquiry was held, found him guilty, and terminated his services. The Labour Court, invoking Section 11A of the Industrial Dispu

M. SUBBA REDDY AND ANR.versusA.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ANO ORS.

2004 INSC 25412 April 2004Dismissed

The petitioners, who were temporarily promoted to Assistant Traffic Manager (ATM) positions under the A.P. State Road Transport Corporation's recruitment regulations, challenged their placement below direct recruits in the integrated seniority list of 1994. The core dispute was whether seniority should be determined by

RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND OTHERSversusGOVERDHAN LAL SONI AND ANR.

2020 INSC 5399 September 2020Dismissed

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (RSRTC) absorbed surplus employees of the now‑defunct Rajasthan State Agro Industries Corporation (RSAIC) and offered them a choice between the CPF scheme and the RSRTC pension scheme. Respondent Goverdhan Lal Soni opted for the pension scheme, and the employee and employe

CHAIRMAN & M.D., K.S.R.T.C.versusK.O. VARGHESE AND ORS.

2007 INSC 7319 July 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The Kerala State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC), an autonomous corporation established under the Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950, sought to defer the implementation of enhanced pension benefits recommended by the Fifth Kerala Pay Commission due to its precarious financial condition. The State Government, after

U.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusU.P. RAJYA SADAK PARIYAHAN KARAMCHARI UNION

2007 INSC 2729 March 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The Uttar Pradesh Rajya Sadak Pariyahan Karamchari Union filed an application before the Labour Court under Section 11‑C of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, read with Section 13‑A of the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, seeking a declaration that fifteen contract drivers and conductors be regularised as su

CALCUTTA STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ORS.versusASHIT CHAKRABORTY & ORS.

2023 INSC 5058 May 2023Dismissed

The respondent, a conductor appointed in 1981, exercised his option in 1991 to join the pension scheme created by the Calcutta State Transport Corporation Employees’ Service (Death cum Retirement Benefits) Regulations, 1990, which had retrospective effect from 1 April 1984. Upon voluntary retirement in 2017, he receive

HALLI GOWDA & ORS.versusMANAGING DIRECTOR, K.S.R.T.C. & ANR.

1989 INSC 808 March 1989Disposed off

Thirty-two bus conductors employed on a daily‑wage basis by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) alleged that the corporation, being a statutory body, is a "State" within Art 12 of the Constitution and that it had discriminated against them by regularising nineteen similarly placed conductors and gran

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search