Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Sale of Goods Act, 1930

91 judgments · newest first · showing 1–91

VYANKTESH SHANTILAL PANDYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH

The petitioners, Vyankatesh Shantilal Pandya (deceased) and relatives, filed criminal miscellaneous applications under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quashment of FIR C.R.No.I‑86 of 2017 which alleged offences under Sections 406, 420, 34, 120‑B and 114 IPC for a purported fraudulent marriage aimed …

HOUSE OF DUBARYversusTHE OFFICER LIQUIDATOR OF HANSPA KNIT (P) LTD.,

46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH

The Gujarat High Court heard cross‑appeals arising from Special Civil Suit No. 120 of 1979 in which Hanspa Knit (P) Ltd., a company in liquidation, sought recovery of export proceeds from House of Dubary and its partners (defendants 1‑4) and other parties. The trial court had partially allowed the …

OFFICER LIQUIDATOR OF HANSPA KNIT (P) LTD.versusHOUSE OF DUBARY

46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH

The Gujarat High Court heard cross‑appeals arising from Special Civil Suit No. 120 of 1979 in which Hanspa Knit (P) Ltd., a company in liquidation, sought recovery of export proceeds from House of Dubary and its partners (defendants 1‑4) and other parties. The trial court had partially allowed the …

UNION OF INDIA & OTHERSversusFUTURE GAMING SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. & ANOTHER ETC.

2025 INSC 181Disposed off

The Union of India challenged the liability of several private companies, including Future Gaming Solutions, to pay service tax on the sale of paper and online lottery tickets for the Government of Sikkim. The High Court of Sikkim had set aside service‑tax notices issued under various amendments to …

M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD.versusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE

2024 INSC 880Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether mobile service providers (MSPs) could claim CENVAT credit on excise duties paid for mobile towers and prefabricated buildings (PFBs) used in their networks. The dispute arose from conflicting decisions of the Bombay High Court, which held the towers and PFBs to be …

DELHI RACE CLUB (1940) LTD. & ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.

2024 INSC 626Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant, a supplier of horse feed, alleged that Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. and its officers failed to pay Rs 9,11,434 for goods supplied and filed a private complaint invoking sections 406, 420 and 120B of the IPC. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, after a magisterial inquiry under …

K. ARUMUGAMversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ETC.

2024 INSC 630Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, who were registered lottery dealers in Kerala, bought state lottery tickets in bulk at a discount and resold them to retailers on an outright basis, earning a profit. The Central Excise authorities directed them to obtain service‑tax registration and pay tax under the heading …

KARIKHO KRIversusNUNEY TAYANG AND ANOTHER

2024 INSC 289Disposed off

In the 2019 Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly election, independent candidate Karikho Kri was elected from Tezu (ST) constituency. Nuney Tayang challenged the election, alleging that Kri failed to disclose three vehicles, a no‑dues certificate for government accommodation, and …

M/S. D. N. SINGHversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL, PATNA AND ANOTHER

2023 INSC 543Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a common carrier, was assessed under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act for short delivery of bitumen, with the assessing officer deeming the bitumen as an "other valuable article" owned by the appellant. The Supreme Court examined whether a carrier can be considered the owner of goods …

M/S TATA MOTORS LTD.versusTHE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (SPL) & ANR.

2023 INSC 533Reference answered

The Supreme Court examined whether a credit note issued by an automobile manufacturer to a dealer, for replacing a defective part under a warranty, constitutes a sale liable to sales tax. It held that when the dealer uses a part from his own stock or purchases it from the market and is reimbursed by …

RAJRATAN BABULAL AGARWALversusSOLARTEX INDIA PVT. LTD.& ORS.

2022 INSC 1081Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an ex‑director of the corporate debtor, contested the admission of an application filed by the operational creditor under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) alleging a debt for coal supplied under a purchase order. The creditor claimed the coal was of inferior …

HYUNDAI MOTOR INDIA LIMITEDversusSHAILENDRA BHATNAGAR

2022 INSC 454Dismissed

Hyundai Motor India Ltd. appealed against the award of compensation and punitive damages granted by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission and upheld by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for a defect in the air‑bag system of a Creta car that failed to deploy in a frontal …

COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIAversusSTATE OF MIZORAM & ORS.

2022 INSC 64Appeal(s) allowed

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) received a complaint alleging that four private firms colluded in the tendering process for Mizoram state lottery distributors, resulting in bid‑rigging and an appreciable adverse effect on competition. The CCI found prima facie evidence of cartelisation …

SKILL LOTTO SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2020 INSC 676Dismissed

Skill Lotto Solutions Pvt. Ltd., an authorised agent for Punjab lotteries, filed a writ petition under Art.32 challenging the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) on the grounds that the definition of ‘goods’ in s.2(52) – which includes actionable claims – is unconstitutional and that …

SURENDRA KUMAR BHILAWEversusTHE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

2020 INSC 434Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Surendra Kumar Bhilawe, owned an Ashok Leyland truck that was insured by New India Assurance. The truck was involved in a serious accident in November 2011, and the appellant filed a claim for the loss. The insurer denied the claim, alleging that the vehicle had been sold in 2008 to …

COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICERversusM/S. BOMBAY MACHINERY STORE

2020 INSC 368Dismissed

The Commercial Taxes Officer challenged the exemption claimed by M/s Bombay Machinery Store under Section 6(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, arguing that the State’s circulars imposed a 30‑day time‑limit after which goods retained by a carrier were deemed to be constructively delivered, …

INTERNET AND MOBILE ASSOCIATION OF INDIAversusRESERVE BANK OF INDIA

2020 INSC 264Appeal(s) allowed

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) issued a Statement and a Circular in April 2018 directing banks and other regulated entities to cease dealing with persons or entities dealing in virtual currencies (VCs) and to exit existing relationships within three months. The petitioners – a trade association and …

M/S D.J. MALPANIversusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NASHIK

2019 INSC 478Appeal(s) allowed

M/s D.J. Malpani, a manufacturer of chewing tobacco, collected a voluntary charitable donation called Dharmada from customers along with the sale price of its goods. The tax authorities treated the Dharmada amount as part of the transaction value and demanded excise duty, penalty and interest. The …

M/S. TATA MOTORS LTD.versusTHE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (SPL) & ANR.

2019 INSC 134Matter referred to larger bench

The appeal concerned whether sales tax is payable on the free replacement of defective motor‑vehicle parts supplied by a dealer under a warranty, when the dealer receives a credit note from the manufacturer for the returned defective part. The dealer pays sales tax on the purchase of spare parts and …

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR.versusM/S DURGA PROJECTS INC

2018 INSC 205Dismissed

M/s Durga Projects Inc, a civil works contractor registered under the Karnataka Value Added Tax (KVAT) Act, 2003 and the Central Sales Tax Act, sought clarification from the Authority for Advance Clarification and Ruling on the tax rate applicable to works contracts before 1 April 2006. The AAR held …

MIS ARIHANT UDHYOGversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

2017 INSC 475Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether licensees under the Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act who purchase agricultural produce from outside Rajasthan and bring it into the market area are required to pay the market fee. The Court held that liability depends on when title in the goods passes; if …

M/S SHANTI CONDUCTORS (P) LTD. ANR.versusASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.

2019 INSC 81Matter referred to larger bench

The Supreme Court examined whether the Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993 (the 1993 Act) applies retrospectively to supply orders placed before its commencement on 23‑09‑1992. The Court held that the Act is prospective, its liability arising …

M/S GUJARAT AMBUJA EXPORTS LTD &ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.

2015 INSC 906Appeal(s) allowed

The Uttarakhand Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 2011 levied a market fee and development cess on any agricultural produce arriving in a notified market area for sale, storage, processing, manufacturing or other commercial purposes. Gujarat Ambuja Exports Ltd and …

M/S. KONE ELEVATOR INDIA PVT. LTD.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.

2014 INSC 359Disposed off

The Court examined whether a composite contract for the manufacture, supply and installation of lifts constitutes a "sale of goods" or a "works contract" for tax purposes under Article 366(29A)(b) of the Constitution and related sales‑tax statutes. The petitioners argued that the installation …

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEEversusBIOTOR INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANR.

2013 INSC 799Disposed off

The Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) of Baroda levied a market fee on castor seeds purchased by Biotor Industries Ltd., an industrial concern that processes the seeds into castor oil. The company argued that the seeds were brought from outside the market area and, under Rule 48(2) of the …

M/S. LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED & ANR.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.

2013 INSC 653Reference answered

The Supreme Court examined whether agreements between a developer and flat purchasers constitute "works contracts" under Art.366(29‑A)(b) and whether the State can levy sales tax on the goods used in such contracts. It held that a construction agreement, even when coupled with a transfer of …

PHULCHAND EXPORTS LTDversusO.O.O. PATRIOT

2011 INSC 753Dismissed

Phulchand Exports Ltd. (seller) shipped 1,000 metric tons of rice to 000 Patriot (buyer) under a CIF contract but delayed shipment by 16 days and loaded the goods on a vessel that was not bound for the agreed destination, causing the cargo to be lost. The buyer invoked a reimbursement clause in the …

SUCHETAN EXPORTS P. LTD.versusGUPTA COAL INDIA LIMITED AND ORS.

2011 INSC 532Disposed off

The parties entered into a high‑seas sale agreement for 16,943 metric tonnes of South African coal. The seller delivered the whole consignment to a stevedore, who released 9,542.92 tonnes to the buyer, leaving 7,400.082 tonnes in its custody. The buyer failed to pay the balance price, prompting the …

RAVINDER RAJversusM/S. COMPETENT MOTORS CO. PVT. LTD. & ANR.

2011 INSC 115Dismissed

Ravinder Raj booked a Maruti car in the mid‑1980s, paid an advance and later paid the full price in February 1989. Before the official billing on 5 April 1989, the government raised excise duty, increasing the car's price by about Rs.6,710, and the dealer asked the buyer to pay the excess amount, …

C.N. ANANTHARAMversusM/S. FIAT INDIA LTD. AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

2010 INSC 811Disposed off

The petitioner bought a diesel Fiat Siena Weekender and complained of engine rattling noise, leading the dealer to replace the engine and other parts. Unsatisfied, he demanded a new vehicle or a refund of the purchase price and expenses, filing complaints before the District Forum, State Commission, …

STATE OF UTTARANCHALversusM/S. KHURANA BROTHERS

2010 INSC 746Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttaranchal auctioned crude resin and the highest bid was placed by Khurana Brothers, leading to a formal contract of sale dated 24 March 2001 and an acceptance letter on 7 April 2001 requiring the resin to be lifted within 60 days. The issue before the Supreme Court was whether this …

ASSOCIATION OF LEASING AND FINANCIAL SERVICE COMPANIESversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2010 INSC 733Dismissed

The Association of Leasing and Financial Service Companies challenged the levy of service tax under Section 66 of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended) on financial leasing, equipment leasing and hire‑purchase services, arguing that Parliament lacked competence under Entry 97 of List I because Article …

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusM/S MARTIN LOTTERY AGENCIES LTD.

2009 INSC 701Dismissed

The case concerned whether the sale, promotion and marketing of state‑run lottery tickets by M/s Martin Lottery Agencies Ltd. attracted service tax under Section 65(19) of the Finance Act, 1994. The High Court had held that lottery tickets are not "goods" and that the distributor’s activities were …

M/S. VIJAY INDUSTRIESversusM/S. NATL TECHNOLOGIES LTD.

2008 INSC 1467Appeal(s) allowed

Vijay Industries, a small‑scale supplier of castor oil, sued Natl Technologies for non‑payment of invoices and for interest on delayed payments, filing a winding‑up petition under Sections 433(e), 433(f) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956. The respondent argued that interest was not a debt because …

KRISHI UTPADAN MANDI SAMITI, GHAZIABAD AND ANR.versusM/S. METAL CRAFT & ORS.

2008 INSC 766Dismissed

The appellant Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Ghaziabad claimed market fee under Section 17(iii)(b) of the Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964 on rice exported by the respondent partnership firm. The respondent argued that the rice was purchased from millers outside Uttar Pradesh and …

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.versusM/S SRI CHAMUNDESWARI SUGAR LTD.

2008 INSC 464Case Allowed

M/s Sri Chamundeswari Sugar Ltd., a sugar manufacturer, purchased sugarcane from growers and paid the Statutory Minimum Price fixed by the Central Government together with the State Advised Price (SAP) fixed by Karnataka. The assessing authority levied purchase tax on the total amount, including …

ACCOUNTS OFFICER, JHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANR.versusANWAR ALI

2007 INSC 1024Case Partly allowed

Anwar Ali filed a complaint before the District Consumer Forum alleging that his electricity supply was disconnected without prior notice. The Forum awarded him Rs 50,000 compensation with interest, an order upheld by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission and the National Consumer …

NUMALIGARH REFINERY LID.versusDAELIM INDUSTRIAL COMPANY LID.

2007 INSC 896Disposed off

Numaligarh Refinery Ltd (NRL), a Government undertaking, awarded a turnkey power plant contract to Daelim Industrial Co Ltd (DIC). During execution, DIC lodged a claim of Rs 55.8 crore covering substituted material, turbo‑technical price, counter‑vailing duty, exchange‑rate fluctuation, liquidity …

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANR.versusCORPORATION BANK

2007 INSC 349Disposed off

The Government of Andhra Pradesh issued a demand notice under Section 5 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 for tax on the turnover of an auction sale of jewellery held on 19‑08‑1987 by Corporation Bank, invoking Explanation IV to Section 2(1)(e) inserted by Act No. 27 of 1996. The …

FEDERAL BANK LTD. AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

2007 INSC 328Dismissed

Federal Bank Ltd. and other banks challenged notices issued by the Kerala tax department demanding sales tax on the auction sale of gold and other valuables pledged as security for loans. The banks argued that such sales were not "sales" within the meaning of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 …

BHUPENDRA SINGH BHATIAversusSTATE OF M.P. AND ORS

2006 INSC 963Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court considered a dispute where the State of Madhya Pradesh, under a new excise policy, purchased foreign liquor from a wholesaler, Bhupendra Singh Bhatia, at rates fixed by a district‑level purchase committee in April‑May 1996, pending a final decision by a state‑level committee. After …

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.versusRAJASTHAN CHEMIST ASSOCIATION

2006 INSC 462Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Section 4A of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994, which levied tax on the first point sale of drugs, medicines and formulations by wholesalers to retailers based on the Maximum Retail Price (MRP) printed on the package rather than the actual …

DHAMPUR SUGAR MILLS LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX, U.P.

2006 INSC 338Dismissed

Dhampur Sugar Mills Ltd entered into a licence deed to use a sugar mill, agreeing to pay the licence fee largely in molasses. The revenue department assessed trade tax on the molasses, treating it as a sale under the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948. The appellant argued that the molasses payment …

STANDARD CHARTERED BANKversusANDHRA BANK FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. & ORS

2006 INSC 291Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerns the ownership of Rs. 50 crore 9% tax‑free bonds (the "suit bonds") issued by Nuclear Power Corporation Ltd. (NPCL). Andhra Bank Financial Services Ltd. (ABFSL) sold the bonds to Standard Chartered Bank (SCB) on 26‑27 February 1992, and SCB paid consideration and received a Banker's …

M/S. SUNRISE ASSOCIATESversusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

2006 INSC 261Reference answered

The Supreme Court examined whether the sale of lottery tickets falls within the definition of "goods" for the purpose of State sales tax statutes. The Court held that a lottery ticket is merely a token evidencing a chance to win a prize, which constitutes an actionable claim under the Transfer of …

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 133Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether the provision of telephone services by telecom operators constitutes a sale of goods, a service, or a composite contract of both, and consequently whether State governments can levy sales tax under Entry 54 of List II. The petitioners argued that the transaction is …

INDOCHEM ELECTRONIC AND ANR.versusADDL. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, A.P.

2006 INSC 116Dismissed

Indochem Electronic supplied an EPABX telephone system to the Additional Collector of Customs, Andhra Pradesh, with a one‑year warranty and a promise to open a service centre. The system was defective from the outset, and despite repeated complaints the supplier failed to provide satisfactory …

XEROX MODICORP LIMITED.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2005 INSC 376Dismissed

Xerox Modicorp Ltd entered into Full Service Maintenance Agreements (FSMA) and Spares and Service Maintenance Agreements (SSMA) with customers after selling Xerox machines. The dispute concerned whether the supply of spare parts, toners and developers under these agreements amounted to a sale liable …

BHAGAWATI OXYGEN LTD.versusHINDUSTAN COPER LTD.

2005 INSC 184Appeal(s) allowed

Bhagawati Oxygen Ltd. (BOL) entered into a contract with Hindustan Copper Ltd. (HCL) for the supply of oxygen, which contained an arbitration clause. An arbitrator awarded Rs. 74,84,521.34 to BOL and granted interest at 18% per annum, dismissing HCL's counter‑claim. HCL challenged the award under …

SMT. CLAUDE-LILA PARULEKARversusM/S. SAKAL PAPERS PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

2005 INSC 159Disposed off

The appellant, a beneficiary of a trust, claimed a pre‑emptive right under Article 57‑A of the company's Articles of Association to purchase 3,417 and 93 shares held by joint executors, but the executors sold those shares to a third‑party group without complying with the Articles or Section 108 of …

TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICESversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2004 INSC 643Dismissed

Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) sold canned computer software packages and was assessed sales tax by the Andhra Pradesh Commercial Tax Officer, who held that the software constituted "goods" under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957. TCS appealed, arguing that software is intangible …

CANBANK FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.versusTHE CUSTODIAN AND ORS.

2004 INSC 494Appeal(s) allowed

Canbank Financial Services Ltd., a subsidiary of Canara Bank, purchased CANCIGO units worth Rs 33 crore from a stock broker (Respondent 2) who had applied for the units through two other banks (Respondents 3 and 4) that held the certificates in their names but transferred possession to the broker. …

SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD.versusSTATE OF M.P. AND ORS.

2003 INSC 542Dismissed

The State of Madhya Pradesh enhanced the royalty payable on coal and sought recovery of the differential amount from South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. (the Coalfields) and the ultimate consumers. The Coalfields, bound by their mining lease and Mineral Concession Rules, were required to pay simple …

M.S. MADHUSOODHANAN AND ANR.versusKERALA KAUMUDI PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

2003 INSC 361Disposed off

The case involved a family dispute over the control of Kerala Kaumudi Pvt. Ltd., focusing on the validity of share transfers from Mani and his children to M.S. Madhusoodhanan, the removal of Madhusoodhanan as Managing Director and the deletion of Article 74, the allotment of additional shares to …

R.D. GOYAL AND ANR.versusRELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD.

2002 INSC 477Dismissed

The appellants R.D. Goyal and others challenged the MRTP Commission’s finding that the issue of equity shares linked with redeemable non‑convertible debentures, before allotment, did not constitute "goods" under Section 2(e) of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969. They argued …

M/S. ESCORTS JCB LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI-II

2002 INSC 439

Escorts JCB Ltd., a manufacturer of excavators, sold its goods on an ex‑works basis at its Ballabgarh factory, handing over possession to the buyer's carrier. The Central Excise authorities, after a factory visit, observed that transit‑insurance and freight charges were not included in the declared …

R.D.SAXENAversusBALRAM PRASAD SHARMA

2000 INSC 409Disposed off

The appellant, a senior advocate and former legal advisor to a cooperative bank, refused to return the bank's case files after the retainership was terminated, demanding payment of alleged fees of Rs. 97,100. The bank filed a complaint before the State Bar Council, which was transferred to the Bar …

M?S HINDUSTAN SHIPYARD LTD.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2000 INSC 342Dismissed

Hindustan Shipyard Ltd., a public sector shipbuilder, challenged the assessment of sales tax on contracts for building ships, arguing that the contracts were works contracts under Section 2(t) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957. The State of Andhra Pradesh contended that the contracts …

THAMPANOOR RAVIversusCHARUPARA RAVI AND ORS.

1999 INSC 402Appeal(s) allowed

Thampanoor Ravi was elected to the Kerala Legislative Assembly and his election was challenged on two grounds: (i) that he was an "undischarged insolvent" within the meaning of Article 191(1)(c) of the Constitution, and (ii) that he had indulged in corrupt practices under Section 123 of the …

FERRO ALLOYS CORPORATION LTD. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1998 INSC 480Appeal(s) allowed

Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd, a 100% export‑oriented unit manufacturing charge chrome, entered an off‑take agreement with Richco (Switzerland) and subsequently executed specific Charge Chrome Agreements for each shipment. The State of Orissa treated the sales for assessment years 1990‑91 and 1991‑92 …

BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANR.versusUSHA MARTIN INDUSTRIES AND ANR.

1997 INSC 499Dismissed After

The Bihar State Electricity Board imposed a central excise duty on electricity generation and merged it into a uniform tariff, later levying a surcharge. When the central excise duty was abolished, the Patna High Court held that the Board should reduce the uniform tariff. The Board appealed, arguing …

AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEEversusSHALIMAR CHEMICAL WORKS LTD.

1997 INSC 496Dismissed

The Agricultural Market Committee, a statutory body under the Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966, levied a market fee on Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd for its purchase of copra. The respondent challenged the fee, arguing that the sale occurred in Kerala, not within …

B.O.I. FINANCE LIMITED ETC.versusTHE CUSTODIAN AND ORS. ETC.

1997 INSC 292Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant banks entered into ready‑forward (buy‑back) contracts with brokers before June 1992, consisting of a completed ready leg (purchase of securities) and a future forward leg. The Custodian, under the Special Court Act, claimed the contracts were void for violating RBI circulars issued …

UNITED BREWERIES LTD.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

1997 INSC 225Appeal(s) allowed

United Breweries Ltd. (the appellant) challenged the assessment of sales tax on the value of bottles and crates supplied with its beer, arguing that these were not sold but were returned against a refundable deposit. The Commercial Tax Officer, the Tribunal and the Andhra Pradesh High Court held …

MAFATLAL INDUSTRIES LTD. ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA ETC. ETC.

1996 INSC 1514Disposed off

The case concerns refunds of excise and customs duties collected contrary to law. The Supreme Court examined the validity of Section 11-B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, as amended in 1991, which restricts refunds to claimants who have not passed on the burden of duty to others. The Court …

STATE OF TAMIL NADUversusSRI SRINIVASA SALES CIRCULATION

1996 INSC 1143Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a coupon scheme operated by Sri Srinivasa Sales Circulation where a customer paid Rs.5 for a coupon, received three coupons for Rs.16 each, sold them to three persons for Rs.5 each, and ultimately obtained an article of his choice after the downstream purchasers cleared …

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusBRIDGE AND ROOF CO. (INDIA) LTD.

1996 INSC 906Dismissed

The State of Uttar Pradesh entered into a works contract with Bridge & Roof Co. (India) Ltd., which required the State to deduct 4% tax at source under the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948. The Commissioner of Sales Tax, under a composition scheme, directed a reduced deduction of 1% and the State complied, …

M/S. L.D.L. CHEMICALS LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 783Appeal(s) allowed

M/s IDL Chemicals Ltd. manufactures explosives using 80% ammonium nitrate melt purchased from SAIL. An exemption notification dated 11 June 1969 exempted such ammonium nitrate from excise duty under Tariff Item 14HH, provided the licence and bond were obtained. The Central Board later reclassified …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusM/S. THE BRITANNIA BISCUITS CO. LTD.

1994 INSC 544Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra appealed against The Britannia Biscuits Co. Ltd., which sold biscuits in tins and collected a refundable deposit for the tins, refunding it only if the tins were returned within three months. The Assessing Authority treated the amount written off from unreturned tin deposits …

HINDUSTAN LEVER EMPLOYEES' UNIONversusHINDUSTAN LEVER LIMITED AND ORS

1994 INSC 483Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered the sanction of a scheme of amalgamation between Tata Oil Mills Company Ltd. (TOMCO) and Hindustan Lever Ltd. (HLL), a subsidiary of the foreign multinational Unilever. The petitioners – nominal TOMCO shareholders, employee unions and consumer groups – challenged the …

MORGAN STANLEY MUTUAL FUNDversusKARTICK DAS

1994 INSC 220Disposed off

Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund, a SEBI‑registered domestic mutual fund, sought to issue a public fund scheme after obtaining SEBI approval for its draft scheme and advertising the issue. A prospective investor filed a petition before the Calcutta District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum seeking an …

SVENSKA HANDELSBANKENversusMIS INDIAN CHARGE CHROME AND ORS.

1993 INSC 336Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff (borrower) entered into contracts with suppliers for a 108 MW captive power plant and with a consortium of banks, including Svenska Handelsbanken, for financing. The plant was later found to have a capacity of only 60 MW, leading the plaintiff to allege fraud by the suppliers and the …

BUILDERS' ASSOCIATION.OF INDIAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS

1992 INSC 315Dismissed

The Builders' Association of India, an association of contractors, challenged the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, specifically Explanation 3(c) to Section 2(t) and Section 5‑B with the Sixth Schedule, alleging that they converted inter‑state sales into intra‑state sales and imposed tax on the value …

MARWAR TENT FACTORYversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1989 INSC 341Appeal(s) allowed

The Marwar Tent Factory supplied 1,500 tents to the Defence Services under a contract that stipulated delivery F.O.R. Jodhpur. After dispatching the consignment by rail, the Commandant of the C.O.D. at Kanpur claimed that 224 tents were missing and deducted their price from the amount due. The …

COFFEE BOARD, KARNATAKA, BANGALOREversusCOMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES

1988 INSC 163Disposed off

The Coffee Board challenged the levy of purchase tax on coffee it received from growers under the compulsory delivery provision of the Coffee Act, 1942, arguing that the transaction was a compulsory acquisition and not a sale. The Karnataka High Court held that an element of consensuality existed, …

FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIAversusSURENDRA, DEVENDRA & MOHENDRA TRANSPORT CO.

1987 INSC 371Disposed off

The Food Corporation of India (appellant) hired Sureendra, Devendra & Mohendra Transport Co. (respondent) as a transport contractor under three written agreements. Disputes over demurrage, wharfage and shortage charges were referred to an arbitrator pursuant to an arbitration clause. The arbitrator …

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION GALIMALA & ORS.versusABAADUTA JENA

1987 INSC 259Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether an arbitrator, appointed without court intervention, could award interest for the period before the reference and for the pendente lite period of the arbitration. It held that an arbitrator is not a court within the meaning of CPC s.34 and therefore cannot award …

H. ANRAJ ETC.versusGOVERNMENT OF TAMILNADU ETC.

1985 INSC 221Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether state lotteries organised by Tamil Nadu and West Bengal could be taxed under the states' sales‑tax statutes. The petitioners, dealers in lottery tickets, argued that lottery tickets are not "goods" but merely actionable claims, rendering the amendments to the Tamil …

STATE OF ORISSA & OTHERSversusTHE TITAGHUR PAPER MILLS COMPANY LTD. & ANR.

1985 INSC 43Disposed off

The State of Orissa issued notifications under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, imposing a 10% purchase tax on bamboos and standing trees agreed to be severed. Petitioners challenged the validity of these notifications, arguing that the transactions were not sales of goods, that the tax amounted to …

KHAZAN CHAND ETC.versusSTATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND OTHERS

1984 INSC 28Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, registered dealers under the Jammu and Kashmir General Sales Tax Act, 1962, filed quarterly returns but failed to pay the tax on time, leading the Assessing Authority to levy interest under section 8 of the Act. They challenged the constitutional validity of sections 8(1), 8(2) and …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusKRISHNA BHIMA WALVAKAR & ANR.

1981 INSC 112Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Karnataka appealed against the High Court's setting aside of a confiscation order of a 7,200 kg consignment of groundnut oil. The oil had been seized because the transporter failed to file the mandatory Form II declaration with the Tehsildar before the consignment left the place, as …

CONSOLIDATED COFFEE LTD. AND ANR. ETC.versusCOFFEE BOARD, BANGALORE ETC. ETC.

1980 INSC 83

The Coffee Board conducts export auctions of coffee and requires registered exporters to furnish security deposits and, under a 1977 circular, contingency deposits or bank guarantees equal to the sales tax that would have been payable despite the exemption granted by Section 5(3) of the Central …