Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
62 judgments · newest first · showing 1–62
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Munawwer, who was charged under sections of the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act for alleged sexual offences against a minor. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, citing the victim's statement that the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Rajjeet @ Ramji Rajbhar, who was charged with rape of a minor girl (aged 13 years 5 months) under sections of the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, there was no …
The appellant Saurabh Teotia appealed against a charge sheet and cognizance order relating to alleged sexual offences committed in 2017 when the complainant was purportedly 17 years old. The complainant alleged that the appellant lured her with a promise of marriage, established a physical …
The appellants, Ramashray Yadav and others, appealed against a conviction under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act arising from FIR No. 505 of 2025. They contended that the medical examination was delayed, the injuries were minor, and the FIR was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shani Kumar in Criminal Case No. 156 of 2026, which involved charges under the B.N.S., the POCSO Act, and the SC/ST Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, citing the victim’s statement that she voluntarily left home and married …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Taufiq, who was arrested in Crime No. 180 of 2025 under Sections 87 and 64(1) of the BNS Act, Sections 5/6 of the POCSO Act and Section 3(2)5 of the SC/ST Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, stating that the victim, now 19 years …
Ram Lal Jayan filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking a further investigation, transfer of the investigation, and a supplementary charge sheet in a criminal case pending before the Special Judge. The applicant alleged that without these orders he would suffer irreparable loss. …
The appellants, Shamshad and another, appealed against a summoning order dated 21 January 2026 issued by the Special Judge under the SC/ST Act in Complaint Case No. 29 of 2025 (Ramchandra vs. Shamshad). The order was based on sections 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.) …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Karan Kashyap, who was arrested in connection with a case under sections of the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act alleging sexual relations with a minor. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, had no criminal record, and …
Ballu filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 29‑06‑2026 in a complaint case (Kamla Devi v. Ballu) and to stay the proceedings. The court noted that the petition was incomplete because the referenced medical examination reports were not …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sahil alias Rocky, who was arrested in Crime No. 381 of 2026 for alleged rape of a 15‑year‑7‑month‑old girl under sections of the B.N.S., the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the victim’s …
Petitioners Surendra Singh and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 12‑02‑2026 (Case Crime No. 49 of 2026) registered under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the BNS and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act, and also a mandamus directing the State …
The applicants, Ram Milan Sharma and Ankush Sharma, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash and stay the criminal proceedings in Case No. 930 of 2026, which arose from a charge sheet under various provisions of the SC/ST Act. Although three counsel were listed for the …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving offences under IPC sections 363, 372, 504, 506, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The applicant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and to file a regular bail …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sajan @ Deepak Lodhi, who was arrested in a case involving alleged rape of a 16‑year‑old girl under the POCSO Act, as well as offences under the BNS Act, SC/ST Act and the IT Act. The applicant argued that the victim was a consenting …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dharmendra, accused in Crime No. 141 of 2026 for alleged gang rape of a 14‑year‑old girl under sections of the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The applicant claimed false implication, lack of incriminating material, delay in filing the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramlakhan Nishad, who was charged under sections of the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act for alleged gang rape of a 14‑year‑old girl. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was lodged five days after …
The applicant, a shop‑keeper, was named in an FIR alleging assault, molestation, offences under the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act. He filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, the cognizance order and to stay the trial, claiming he was falsely implicated, …
The appellants filed a criminal appeal seeking to quash the cognizance and all proceedings in Sessions Case No. 227 of 2025, which involved offences under the B.N.S. and the SC/ST Act, on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise that was verified by the trial court. A coordinate bench of …
Reena Devi filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge-sheet and summoning order in a case under various sections of the B.N.S. and the SC/ST Act. During hearing, counsel for the applicant withdrew the request to …
The petitioner, Sikandra Kumar, was arrested on 10 October 2025 in connection with a case alleging kidnapping, rape, and the circulation of obscene photographs of a minor girl. The prosecution presented a victim statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNS Act, confirming the allegations and …
Lalit Kaushik applied for bail in a criminal case (No. 350/2024) under Sections 137(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging that he was falsely implicated and that the FIR was filed due to political rivalry. The State contended that Kaushik, together with his nephew, abducted the …
Nitish Yadav and Gokul Yadav were charged under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and the SC/ST Act for allegedly firing at an informant and her family and using caste-based slurs. The trial court rejected their bail application and ordered continued custody. The …
Nitish Kumar was convicted in the lower court for allegedly assaulting the husband of an informant, resulting in the husband's death. The appellant sought regular bail, claiming a clean record and that the FIR was fabricated. The prosecution, supported by the informant and a Special Public …
Jitu Bind was charged with assault and firing a weapon that injured the informant's father, under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and the SC/ST Act. He applied for bail, claiming innocence and false implication, and has been in custody since August 2025. The State …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Neeta Devi (alias Rita Devi) in a criminal case (Crime No. 149 of 2025) involving offences under the BNS Act, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The applicant sought bail during the pendency of trial, citing that a co‑accused, Sandeep Tyagi, had …
The appellant, Suman Kumar, was charged with murder under several provisions of the B.N.S., 2023 and the SC/ST Act, and his bail application was rejected by the Special Court. He contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that another individual, Ranjan, was the actual shooter and that …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Prince Yadav, who is accused in a special trial involving offences under the BNS, SC/ST Act, IT Act and POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, citing a victim's statement that did not support the prosecution, and argued that he had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the BNS seeking a direction to the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) in Pilibhit to promptly decide a discharge application dated 28‑01‑2026 in Session Trial No.1461 of 2025. The discharge application pertained to charges under Sections 131, 118(1), …
Mahesh Singh appealed against the order rejecting his anticipatory bail in a case under the SC/ST Act where he was alleged to have abused the informant’s son with caste slurs and assaulted him. The FIR was lodged seven days after the alleged incident, which involved a football game and a simple …
The appellant, Laxman Kumar, was charged with rape and related offences under Section 70(2) of the B.N.S., Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, and Sections 3(2)(iv)(v) of the SC/ST Act, after allegedly offering food to the victim and then entering the toilet where the alleged assault occurred. The …
The petitioner, Jitendra Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for allegedly kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, abducted the child, administered a drug, and concealed her in a village house, …
The petitioner, Ashutosh Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he married the minor daughter of the informant and subsequently refused to return her to her parental home, invoking offences under the B.N.S., D.P. Act, POCSO Act and SC/ST Act. The petitioner contended that the …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar Yadav, was charged in Buxar Mahila Police Station Case No. 62 of 2025 for offences under the B.N.S., the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act, alleging that he sexually exploited a minor girl, obtained her mobile number from her bank records, pretended to marry her, and later …
The appellant, Rajnish Kumar, filed an appeal against the Special Judge's order rejecting his bail application in a case involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Arms Act and SC/ST Act. The appeal also sought condonation of an eight‑day delay in filing. The prosecution alleged …
The applicant, Farman, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 73 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the BNS Act, Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, and Section 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST Act. The victim, who is reported to be slightly below the age of …
The petitioner, Ajit Kumar, was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act for allegedly attempting to outrage the modesty of a 14‑year‑old girl. He applied for bail, claiming innocence, that the alleged incident occurred in broad daylight and that …
Tiger Yadav was arrested in connection with a case filed under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the SC/ST Act and has been in custody since 12 January 2025 without any trial progress. The appellant sought regular bail, arguing that continued pre‑trial detention violated his …
The applicant Nadeem filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.78 of 2025) involving offences under the B.N.S., POCSO Act and SC/ST Act. The prosecution alleged that the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S. were contradictory, with one indicating voluntary travel …
Anil Yadav applied for bail after being arrested on 26‑09‑2025 in connection with a FIR alleging attempted rape of a minor, offences under Sections 126(2), 74, 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023, Section 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST Act and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act, 2012. The petitioner claimed the …
The appellant Subhash Rai challenged the order of the Exclusive Special Judge dated 18‑08‑2025 in a case registered under Gaighat Police Station for offences including assault, attempt to murder and caste‑based abuse under the Indian Penal Code and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The …
The informant alleged that his younger brother, a plumber, was assaulted and verbally abused with caste slurs by the appellants on 19-06-2025, sustaining grievous head injuries that required extensive medical treatment. The appellants sought anticipatory bail, which was denied by the Additional …
The appellant, Birendra Pandey, was charged under several provisions of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act, the Arms Act and the SC/ST Act for allegedly attempting to forcibly take land belonging to the informant and for caste-based abuse. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting that he does …
The appellants, Rashida Khatoon and Muskan Praveen, appealed against the district judge’s order rejecting their anticipatory bail in a case involving the alleged disappearance of a 17‑year‑old girl and alleged caste‑based harassment. The prosecution alleged that the girl was threatened with forced …
Rohit Kumar, a 21‑year‑old, was arrested in a case alleging that he induced a woman of Scheduled Caste into marriage by allurement and maintained a physical relationship for three months, invoking sections of the Bihar Negotiable (B.N.S) Act and the SC/ST Act. The victim later claimed she had …
The petitioner, Ambika Kumar, was arrested in connection with a SC/ST police case alleging gang rape and caste-based abuse, with charges under multiple sections of the BNS, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. The petitioner argued that the alleged victim was an adult, the FIR was lodged 20 days after …
The appellants, five residents of Rajoi village, were charged under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the SC/ST Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and her family in the informant's house. Their application for anticipatory bail was rejected by the Additional Sessions …
The petitioners, who are the children of Tuntun Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS 97/2025) that alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023, Sections 3(i)(r), 3(i)(s), 3(i)(w) of the SC/ST Act and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. They …
The petitioner, Poonam Devi, was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged kidnapping, theft and rape under IPC sections 363, 366 and 376(2)(g). The victim, a 19‑year‑old girl, initially claimed she was eloped by Poonam Devi in the FIR, but later named a different person, Rinku Devi, in a …
The petitioner, Rohit Prasad, was charged with rape under Section 64 of the BNS, Section 4 of the POCSO Act, and Sections 3(1)(r)(s)(w) and 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act. The prosecution alleged that he entered the informant’s house and raped her, while the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 …
The appellant, Tejo Yadav, was charged under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1) of the B.N.S. 2023, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST Act for allegedly participating in a firing incident on 22‑08‑2024 that resulted in the death of an informant’s husband. The prosecution …
Vishwajeet Kumar appealed against the denial of bail in a murder case where he was charged under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and the SC/ST Act. The trial court had rejected his bail plea, and the High Court considered whether bail could be granted despite the trial already being …
The appellant, Rambriksha Mahto, was charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Non‑Applicable Statutes (BNS) and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and his family while denigrating their caste. The prosecution’s case …
Vikash Paswan was charged under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the Arms Act and the SC/ST Act in Nawada Muffasil P.S. Case No. 372 of 2024. An exclusive judge of the SC/ST Act court denied his bail application, and a coordinate bench of the Patna High Court also rejected …
The appellants, Manoj Yadav and Pramod Yadav, were charged in PS‑Ara Nagar case No. 323/2025 for offences under the Bihar Non‑Applicable Statutes, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act following a shooting that resulted in the death of the respondent’s son. The prosecution’s case …
The appellants Manoj Yadav and Pramod Yadav were charged under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the B.N.S., Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act (later amended with Sections 25(1)(b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act) for allegedly firing indiscriminately and causing the death of a …
The appellants, Rahul Yadav and Sonu Yadav, were charged under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly conspiring to fraudulently obtain a sale deed, trespassing, ransacking property and …
The appellant, Ram Lal Das, appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge that denied his bail application in a case alleging rape of a mentally challenged girl, video recording of the act, and its circulation. The charges were framed under Sections 126(2), 64(2), 70(1) of the Bharatiya …
The appellant, Shrawan Sah, appealed against the order of the SC/ST Exclusive Special Judge that denied his bail in a case involving alleged assault, shooting, and offences under the Bihar Penal Code, Arms Act and SC/ST Act. The prosecution alleged that the appellant participated in an assault on …
The petitioners, Guddu Yadav (20 years old) and Ramkrit Yadav, were charged under sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 74, 75, 78(2) of the BNSS Act, sections 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, and section 3(i)(r)(s)(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act for allegedly molesting a minor …
The petitioners – Sita Devi, Niraj Kumar, Chunu Kumar and Rahul Kumar – sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Naubatpur Case No. 426 of 2025) that alleged offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act. The informant claimed that on 24 July 2025 co‑accused …
Chandan Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he, along with others, abducted a minor girl, assaulted her, and uploaded a video of the assault on social media, violating several provisions of the B.N.S., POCSO Act, SC/ST Act and the I.T. Act. The petitioner contended that he was …
