Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
4 judgments · newest first · showing 1–4
Shivam Chaudhary was charged with theft, assault with an iron rod, and caste-based abuse under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code and the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused entered the informant's shop, stole articles, and …
The appellants, Rafiqul Islam and Ful Begam, were granted bail by a Special Judge on the condition that they deposit Rs.90,000 in three installments. Due to the COVID‑19 pandemic they were unable to make the payments, and the prosecution sought cancellation of their bail bond, resulting in a …
The petitioner, Gautam Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being named in FIR No.34 of 2025 alleging offences under Section 69 of the B.N.S. 2023, Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, and Sections 3(1)(w) and 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The FIR …
The appellants appealed against the rejection of their anticipatory bail application in a case involving alleged offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The appellants argued that the FIR statements were uncorroborated, no …
