Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act

480 judgments · newest first · showing 401–480

Vikas MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The appellant, Pankaj Kumar Singh, was charged under several IPC provisions and sections of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, and his application for anticipatory bail was rejected by the Special Judge. The prosecution alleged that the appellant entered the …

Ramdeep SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellants, four accused persons, appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Gaya, which rejected their application for anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes …

BINDU DEVIversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

The appellant, Bindu Devi, appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Saran, which had rejected her prayer for anticipatory bail in a case registered under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504/34 and Sections 3(i), (r), (s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes …

Pankaj Kumar Singh @ Pankaj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Pankaj Kumar Singh, was charged under several IPC provisions and sections of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, and his application for anticipatory bail was rejected by the Special Judge. The prosecution alleged that the appellant entered the …

Algu SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants Algu Sah and Krishna Kumar Gupta were charged under several IPC sections (341, 323, 379, 427, 504, 506) and Section 3(1)(r)(w) of the SC/ST Act for allegedly assaulting a man, attempting to outrage his wife's modesty, using caste slurs, and stealing a gold mangalsutra and cash. They …

Chunni Lal SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Chunni Lal Sah, was charged under Sections 498A, 323 and 504 of the IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge, …

Ram BhagatversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Ram Bhagat, was charged under IPC sections 302 and 34 and under the SC/ST Act sections 3(i)(r)(s) and 3(2)(v) for a murder case (Case No. 278 of 2023). He had been denied bail by the Additional Sessions Judge and the High Court earlier, with a liberty to renew after one year. The …

Krishn Kumar Sah @ Krishna SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Krishn Kumar Sah appealed against the order dated 03.07.2024 that denied him anticipatory bail in a case involving offences under the IPC (sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 379, 354B, 34) and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (sections 3(1)(r)(s)(w) and 3(2)(va)). The prosecution alleged that the …

Arnesh Kumar Yadav @ Arnesh Kumar @ Anresh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appeal sought to set aside the trial court's order refusing anticipatory bail to two accused charged with cheating, fraud, assault and offences under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that the informant invested over Rs 6 lakh in a company run by the accused, …

PANKAJ KUMAR SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, five individuals, appealed against the order of the Special Judge that rejected their application for anticipatory bail in a case registered under IPC sections 323, 384, 469, 471, 506 and Sections 3(i), (r), (s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) …

MANISH KUMAR YADAV @ MANISH KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Manish Kumar Yadav, appealed against the order of the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Purnia dated 06-09-2022 which had rejected his anticipatory bail application in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 504, 354 and 34 of the IPC and Sections 3(i)(r)(w)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Appellant Deepak Kumar filed a criminal appeal challenging the order dated 22.07.2024 by which the Special Judge, SC/ST (POA) Act, Muzaffarpur rejected his anticipatory bail in Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S. Case No.831 of 2022. The case arose from allegations that a cheque of Rs.1,90,000 issued by the …

KARE SAH @ KARE LAL SAHversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Kare Sah, was charged under Sections 376 and 342 of the IPC and Sections 3(1)(w) and 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly raping a woman while she was returning from the market. He applied for regular bail, but the Special Judge of the SC/ST Act Court …

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellants, Santosh Kumar and Devendra Kumar, were named in an FIR for alleged rape under sections 376 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and for an offence under section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act. The victim corroborated the allegation in a statement recorded under section 164 of the Criminal …

SANDIPBHAI MAHESHBHAI RANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The appellants were convicted under IPC sections 323 and 504, and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting and insulting a member of a Scheduled Caste. The parties later settled the dispute with community intervention, and …

Punpun Pandey @ Vishnudeo Pandey and OrsversusState Of Bihar and Anr

DISPOSED

The petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quash of FIR No.128 of 2017 lodged at Brahmpur Police Station, which alleged offences under IPC Sections 341, 323, 504, 506/34 and Section 3(1)(R)(S) of the SC/ST Act. The petitioners argued that the FIR had become infructuous …

Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal and AnrversusState Of Bihar and Anr

DISMISSED

The petitioners, brothers Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal and Rajeev Kumar Jaiswal, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the order of the ACJM that took cognizance of offences under IPC Sections 341, 323, 504 and the SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(x) arising from a protest‑cum‑complaint …

Nandan Kumar @ Nandan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Nandan Kumar, was charged under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly establishing a false relationship, using caste‑based slurs and blackmailing the informant. The trial court …

Chhotelal SawversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Chhotelal and Vijay, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant, abusing him with caste slurs, and snatching his wife's mangalsutra. They applied for …

Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant Golu Kumar was charged under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for an alleged assault on workers at a brick kiln. The prosecution’s case was based on a FIR that did not name the appellant; his alleged …

Prince Kumar @ ShubhamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Prince Kumar was charged under Sections 302, 120B, 34 of the IPC, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly murdering the father of an informant over a property dispute. The Special Judge rejected his regular bail application, prompting …

Surendra PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Surendra Pandey, was charged under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged participation in a violent assault on a farmer and his family, during which a death occurred. The trial court …

Arbaz Hussain @ Md. Arwaz @ Md. Arwaz hussainversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Arbaz Hussain (also known as Md. Arwaz), was charged under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly threatening to marry the informant's daughter and …

Vikash ChaubeyversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Vikash Chaubey, appealed against the denial of bail in a case where he was charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly setting fire to a hut, looting jewellery and cash, …

Prince KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Prince Kumar and Ravi Shankar Bhagat, appealed against the Special Judge’s order rejecting their regular bail application in a case involving serious offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Arms Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. …

Devendra Sah @ Devendra DasversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Devendra Sah, appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge refusing bail in a case alleging his involvement in the rape of the informant's mentally challenged daughter, recording and circulating a video of the act, and offences under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) …

Pankaj SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Pankaj Sah, appealed against the denial of bail in a case filed under Section 64 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) & 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act. The prosecution alleged that he maintained a physical relationship with the informant, Anchal Kumari, on a false …

Chhotan Chaubey @ Vinay ChaubeyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Chhotan Chaubey was charged under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly setting fire to an informant's hut, looting jewellery and cash, and assaulting her daughters. The trial court rejected …

Pawan Singh @ Pawan Kumar Singh @ Pawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Pawan Singh and Raju Singh, were charged with murder and offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the SC/ST Act for the death of Rakesh Kumar, who allegedly died after being assaulted. The trial court denied bail, prompting an appeal to the Patna High Court. The …

Sumanta @ Suman Kumar @ Suman Mandal @ SumanthversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Suman Kumar, was charged under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for alleged participation in a mob attack that resulted in a gunshot injury to the informant’s husband. The trial court …

Prince Kumar Sahani @ Prince KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Prince Kumar Sahani appealed against the denial of bail by the Special Judge under the SC/ST Act in a case alleging that he used the informant's caste name and insulted the informant after refusing a marriage alliance. The prosecution alleged that Sahani had a physical relationship with the …

Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Golu Kumar, was accused of molesting a 13‑year‑old girl under multiple provisions of the Bihar Penal Code, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming that the parties had settled the dispute, a view supported by the informant's counsel. The court, …

Vikash Ram @ Vikesh Kumar @ Vikesh Kumar RamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikash Ram and Dhanesh Ram, members of a Scheduled Caste, were implicated in a case (PS No.262/2025) alleging assault on the informant’s son with an iron rod after a dispute over music volume. The petitioners contend that the informant has repeatedly harassed them and that a counter‑case under the …

Vikash Mishra @ Vikash Kumar MishraversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikash Mishra was named in an FIR alleging kidnapping and sexual assault of a girl, alleged to be 17 years old, under Sections 137(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and several provisions of the SC/ST Act. The victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S. indicated that she went with the …

Musan Mian @ Naseem AlamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Musan Mian, also known as Naseem Alam, was arrested in connection with FIR No. 330 of 2025 alleging that a minor girl, the informant's 15‑year‑old daughter, was called to Golu Mian's house and had a physical relationship with him, with the petitioner present. The prosecution alleged offences under …

Chunnu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellant Chunnu Yadav filed a criminal appeal (SJ) No.4532 of 2025 challenging an order of the Special Court under the POCSO Act. The appellant's counsel sought to convert the appeal into a criminal miscellaneous proceeding, citing a prior decision (Cr. Misc. No.52792 of 2019) that bail orders …

Vinod MahatoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vinod Mahato and his wife Sarita Devi applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleges that a 12‑year‑old girl, …

Sabita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, accused in a case involving the illegal manufacture and sale of country-made liquor and related mob violence, applied for regular bail. The police raid uncovered large quantities of illicit liquor at the residence and shop of Lalbabu Mahato, leading to the arrest of several …

Mahendra MarandiversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Mahendra Marandi was charged under IPC sections 363, 364, 365, 506 and later 302, as well as Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act for the alleged killing of a deceased person. He applied for regular bail for the second time after an earlier bail application was rejected. The petitioner argued that no …

AWADHESH RAIversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

ALLOWED

The appellants, Awadhesh Rai, Bigu Rai and Ajit Rai, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing an informant by caste name, assaulting him with a lathi, and stealing Rs. 3,500 and a gold locket. They …

MOHAN KUMAR SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appeal concerned the rejection of anticipatory bail for Mohan Kumar Singh, brother‑in‑law of a Scheduled Caste informant who alleged caste‑based abuse, dowry harassment and forced eviction after an inter‑caste marriage. The charges were under IPC §§ 323, 498A, Dowry Prohibition Act §4 and SC/ST …

Parmeshwar Yadav @ Parmeshwar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, three Yadavs, appealed against the order of the Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST, Gaya, which had rejected their anticipatory bail application in a case registered under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The FIR alleged that the appellants, armed with …

Guddu GiriversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Guddu Giri appealed against the denial of bail in a murder case (Pupri PS Case No. 434 of 2024) where the deceased was the son of an informant. The prosecution relied on a confessional statement of a co‑accused, a witness’s "last‑seen" testimony, and alleged that the appellant was present at the …

Ranjan Singh @ Rajan @ Rajan Singh @ RanjanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Ranjan Singh, was charged in a case involving offences under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, and his anticipatory bail was denied by the SC/ST Exclusive Special Judge. The appellant contended that the specific charge of sexual assault pertained only …

Lallu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Lallu Yadav appealed against the order denying him anticipatory bail in a case where his son, Ramdayal Yadav, was accused of attempting rape and Lallu was alleged to have abused the complainant with caste slurs. The FIR invoked several IPC sections and provisions of the SC/ST (Prevention of …

Bir Bahadur Singh @ Bir SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Bir Bahadur Singh and Dhanu Singh, were charged under several IPC sections and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly stopping a fish seller's motorcycle, abusing him with caste slurs, assaulting him, and extorting Rs 10,000 and a mobile phone. They contended that the …

Manish Kumar @ MonuversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Manish Kumar appealed against the denial of bail in a murder case where he is accused of killing an informant's mother and allegedly violating the SC/ST Act. The prosecution presented a post‑mortem report indicating death by throttling and argued the seriousness of the offence. The appellant …

Santoshi DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Santoshi Devi appealed against the denial of bail in a murder case (PS Case No. 346 of 2024) filed under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act. The prosecution alleges that co‑accused and other miscreants …

Ramashish YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Ramashish Yadav, was arrested in connection with the murder of an informant's husband, alleged to have been committed with a sharp-edged weapon and bricks, and accused of making caste‑based slurs. The prosecution charged him under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya …

Dipak Kumar @ Dipak Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Dipak Kumar and Ganesh Singh, were charged under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant, abusing him by caste name, and robbing him of Rs.5,000. They applied for …

Satyendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, a group of villagers from Haspura, were charged under several IPC provisions (sections 341, 323, 324, 354, 379) and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and her daughters with lathi and danda and abusing them …

Golu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Golu Kumar, was charged under IPC sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 34 and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant with an iron rod, abusing him with caste slurs, and extorting Rs.30,000 and a gold chain. He sought anticipatory …

Chhedilal yadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, four Yadav brothers, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly forcibly taking harvested paddy, abusing and disrobing a woman on caste grounds. They contended that the FIR, lodged 20 days after …

Ranjeet YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Ranjeet Yadav, was charged under several provisions of the IPC, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for an alleged assault on the informant's nephew. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge. On appeal, the counsel …

Raj Ballabh Mahto @ Chacha Raj Ballabh MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, members of the Mahto family, feared arrest in connection with Goraul Police Station Case No. 15 of 2025, which alleged offences under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act. They asserted that they were innocent and were being harassed due …

Subhash Yadav @ Subhash kumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant Subhash Yadav appealed against the denial of bail by the District and Additional Sessions Judge, who had rejected his bail application under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act in a murder case arising from a land dispute. …

MD.MANAURI MIYA @ MD.MONAWWARversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The appellant, Md. Manauri Miya, was charged under multiple IPC sections, the Arms Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for verbally abusing, assaulting and firing a gun at an informant, injuring her hand and threatening to kill her. He applied for anticipatory bail, which was rejected …

Mantun YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Mantun Yadav and Raja Ram Yadav were charged under multiple IPC sections (147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 354, 504, 506) and sections 3(1)(r)(s)(w) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly entering an informant's house, abusing her with …

Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a criminal case (Maner PS Case No. 800 of 2025) that alleged his involvement in an attempted rape of a 13‑year‑old girl. The prosecution charged him under multiple provisions of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (BNS) …

STATE OF GUJARATversusDALSINGBHAI DHANABHAI BARIYA

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The State of Gujarat appealed the acquittals of Dalsinh Dhanabhai Bariya and co‑accused in two interrelated land‑dispute cases arising from incidents on 7‑8‑1994, where the accused were charged under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention …

STATE OF GUJARATversusLIMBABHAI VAJABHAI KOLI PARMAR

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The State of Gujarat appealed the acquittals of Dalsinh Dhanabhai Bariya and co‑accused in two interrelated land‑dispute cases arising from incidents on 7‑8‑1994, where the accused were charged under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention …

Gulab DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gulab Devi, filed an application seeking cancellation of the provisional bail granted to eight accused under the SC/ST Act in a case arising from Kumarkhand police station. The bail had been ordered by the Additional Sessions Judge‑I‑cum‑Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Madhepura, without …

Sikandar MistryversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sikandar Mistry, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 64 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, sections 4, 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act and sections 3(i), (r), (m) and (ii) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, alleging sexual relations with the …

Chutan Kumar @ Chutun KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Chutan Kumar appealed against the Patna High Court's order dated 01‑03‑2025 that rejected his application for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged homicide. The FIR dated 13‑01‑2025 alleged that Kumar, while driving a car, struck a motorcycle, killing Dinesh Paswan and injuring the …

PRITAM KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Pritam Kumar, was charged under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing a girl of a Scheduled Caste and threatening her with a pistol. The trial court rejected his bail …

Ranjan Kumar Yadav @ Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant was convicted in a case involving murder under sections 302 and 34 of the IPC and offences under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that the appellant, along with co‑accused, assaulted and killed the informant's son, also …

Chandan Yadav @ Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, four Yadav brothers, were charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Penal Code, the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, and the Arms Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and his brother. They applied for anticipatory bail, which was denied by …

Bhola Yadav@Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant Bhola Yadav appealed against the refusal of anticipatory bail in a case where he was charged under several sections of the B.N.S, the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused assaulted an informant …

SUKANYA SHANTHAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2024 INSC 753Disposed off

Journalist Sukanya Shantha filed a writ petition alleging that various State prison manuals sanction caste‑based discrimination in the division of labour, segregation of barracks and the classification of "habitual offenders", thereby violating Articles 14, 15, 17, 21 and 23 of the Constitution. The …

SATISH KUMAR JATAVversusTHE STATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2022 INSC 577Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, the original complainant, challenged a High Court order that had quashed criminal proceedings against the accused under Sections 307, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3(10)(15) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The High Court, relying on a single paragraph stating that no …

MEENA DEVIversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

2022 INSC 568Disposed off

The case concerned an appeal by Meena Devi, the wife of a murder victim, against the Allahabad High Court’s order granting bail to the convicted accused, Shivraj Singh alias Lalla Babu, under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. The Supreme Court examined whether the High Court had exercised its discretionary …

SUNIL KUMAR RAI & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2022 INSC 212Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, members of the Lohar community in Bihar, challenged a 2016 Bihar Government notification that authorised the issuance of Scheduled Tribe certificates to the Lohar (also referred to as Lohara) community, alleging it was illegal and violated their fundamental rights. They sought …

BHASKARRAO & ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2018 INSC 419Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra alleged that sixteen accused, including Bhaskarrao and others, murdered Shamrao by assaulting him with weapons and amputating his hand, invoking sections 147, 148, 452 r/w 149, 302 r/w 149 and 506 of the IPC. The trial court acquitted all accused after finding the …

LUNARAMversusBHUPAT SINGH AND ORS.

2009 INSC 282Dismissed

The trial court convicted the accused of murder and offences under the SC/ST Act, but the Rajasthan High Court acquitted them, finding the prosecution's version of events implausible and the eye‑witness testimony unreliable. The State appealed, arguing that the High Court erred in discarding …

GOMTIversusTHAKURDAS AND ORS.

2007 INSC 422Case Partly allowed

The complainant appealed against the Allahabad High Court's orders granting bail to five convicted respondents under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, while their appeals against convictions for murder and related offences were pending. The High Court had justified the bail on the …

RAJBIR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

2006 INSC 146Appeal(s) allowed

The complainant Rajbir Singh lodged an FIR alleging that armed assailants fired at his father Hoti Lal, killing him and a Scheduled Caste girl, Pooja Kumari. During investigation, Akhilesh Chauhan (respondent No.2) was found to have received a rifle from one of the accused and fled the scene, …