ARJUN SINGHversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
2008 INSC 120822 October 2008Appeal(s) allowed
Six persons were charged with offences under Sections 452, 323 read with 34, and 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code for abducting and raping a woman. The prosecutrix identified some of the accused by hearing them address each other by names, but the appellant, Arjun Singh, was not apprehended at the scene and no test i…
BAL KISHANversusSTATE. OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
2008 INSC 121022 October 2008Appeal(s) allowed
The prosecution alleged that Bal Kishan, along with others, forcibly dragged the prosecutrix to a forest and raped her. The trial court convicted the accused based on the testimonies of the prosecutrix, her son and an elderly neighbour, despite finding that the test identification parade conducted by the magistrate did…
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESHversusGITA RAM
2000 INSC 4388 September 2000Disposed off
The respondent, Gita Ram, was charged under Section 376 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The case was committed by a magistrate to a Sessions Court that had been designated as a Special Court for offences under the SC/ST Act, and that Court trie…