Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Sea Customs Act, 1878

13 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.versusSAVEEN KUMAR SHETTY

2002 INSC 9926 February 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Karnataka auctioned the right to retail vend arrack and declared Saveen Kumar Shetty the highest bidder. He deposited the required amount under Rule 13 but failed to furnish security under Rule 17 and to execute the lease deed required by Rule 16. After extending his temporary licence, the Government cance

M/S INDIAN STEAMSHIP CO. LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1998 INSC 18921 April 1998Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant owned the vessel M.V. Indian Resolve which arrived at Calcutta carrying a mixed cargo that included 1,22,400 cigarettes. A shortage of 45,000 cigarettes was later discovered, and the Additional Collector of Customs invoked Section 115(1)(e) of the Customs Act, 1962 to confiscate the vessel, deeming the mi

CHOWGULE & CO. PRIVATE LIMITED ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1987 INSC 5319 February 1987Dismissed

Chowgule & Co. Private Ltd. and V.S. Dempo & Co. imported second‑hand tankers that were converted into transhippers for topping‑up iron ore at Mormugao harbour. The Customs authorities demanded that the companies file Bills of Entry for the vessels, treating them as "goods for home consumption" under s.46 of the Custom

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MYSOREversusM/S. TVS MOTORS COMPANY LTD.

2015 INSC 92115 December 2015Disposed off

TVS Motors Ltd., a manufacturer of two‑wheeled vehicles, sold its cars to dealers who performed pre‑delivery inspection (PDI) and free after‑sales service (ASS) at their own cost. The Central Excise Department sought to include the costs of PDI and ASS in the assessable value under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act,

MOHAN MEAKIN BREWERIES LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, BIHAR AND ORS.

1986 INSC 8015 April 1986Dismissed

The petitioner, Mohan Meakin Breweries, challenged a fresh demand for the difference of excise duty on its stock of Indian‑made foreign liquor as on 1 Nov 1967. The demand was based on a proviso added by a 1971 ordinance to Section 28 of the Bihar & Orissa Excise Act, 1915, which allowed the State to realise the differ

TOOLSIDASS JEWRAJversusADDITIONAL COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND OTHERS

1991 INSC 7213 March 1991Dismissed

Toolsidass Jewraj, a jute exporter, entered into contracts for shipment in early 1962 but delayed the shipment to June after prices rose. Before the goods were shipped, it filed shipping bills and G.R. forms that undervalued the FOB price, intending to discount the buyers' profit and remit it covertly. The Additional C

CHERN TAONG SHANG & ANR., ETC., ETC.versusCOMMANDER S.D. BAIJAL & ORS.

1988 INSC 1013 January 1988Dismissed

Two foreign trawlers chartered by an Indian company were seized for fishing in India's exclusive economic zone in violation of a permit that required fishing at depths greater than 40 fathoms. The masters were convicted and fined, while the charterer company and its managing director were initially acquitted but later

SHROFF & CO., ETC.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER BOMBAY AND ANOTHER, ETC.

1988 INSC 22212 August 1988Dismissed

Shroff & Co., a partnership dealing in wines and spirits, imported liquor into Bombay and stored it in a bonded warehouse under the Maharashtra Foreign Liquor (Storage in Bond) Rules. The appellants challenged the inclusion of countervailing duty in the assessable value for octroi, arguing that the duty was not incurre

COMMNR. OF SALES TAX, ORISSA AND ORS.versusCROWN RE-ROLLER (P) LTD. AND ORS.

2007 INSC 2578 March 2007Case Partly allowed

Crown Re‑roller (P) Ltd., a re‑rolling mill in Orissa, purchased iron and steel scrap from registered dealers. The State of Orissa, under an industrial policy, exempted raw material purchases from sales tax, but a 1989 notification shifted the taxable event to the first point of sale. The company claimed a refund of sa

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, ALLAHABADversusM/S J.R. ORGANICS LTD.

2023 INSC 1831 March 2023Dismissed

The Commissioner of Central Excise valued specially denatured spirits (SDS) supplied by M/s J.R. Organics Ltd. by taking the highest price of SDS at another unit on a particular date, invoking Rule 6(p)(ii) of the Central Excise Rules, 1994. The assessee challenged this, arguing that the value should be based on the mo

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search