Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

State Financial Corporations Act, 1951

40 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION,SHIMLAversusPREM NATH NANDA AND ORS.

2000 INSC 49631 October 2000Appeal(s) allowed

The Himachal Pradesh State Financial Corporation granted a loan of Rs.20.5 lakh to Prem Nath Nanda and others for a hotel project. After the borrowers defaulted, the corporation took possession of the hotel under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 and sold it, generating an excess amount over the

MIS. SHIV COTEXversusTIRGUN AUTO PLAST P. LTD. & ORS.

2011 INSC 62430 August 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Mis. Shiv Cotex, sued the Punjab Financial Corporation for allegedly illegal takeover of its mortgaged assets under the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951. The trial court dismissed the suit after the plaintiff failed to produce evidence on three scheduled dates, invoking Order XVII Rule 3(a) of the

MAHARASHTRA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATIONversusASHOK K. AGARWAL AND ORS .

2006 INSC 18930 March 2006Dismissed

Maharashtra State Financial Corporation (MSFC) had sanctioned a loan to Crystal Marketing Pvt Ltd, whose directors stood as sureties. After default, MSFC invoked Sections 31 and 32 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 to sell hypothecated property, and later, after a shortfall, issued notice to the sureties an

PEGASUS ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION P. LTD.versusM/S. HARYANACONCAST LIMITED &ANR.

2015 INSC 94729 December 2015Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether a Company Court or an Official Liquidator can control the sale of secured assets by a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act when the borrower is a company under winding up. Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Ltd, the secured creditor, sought to enforce its security over the land of Harya

M/S. ORMI TEXTILES & ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.

2008 INSC 54729 April 2008Case Partly allowed

M/S Ormi Textiles, a partnership, obtained loans from the State Financial Corporation (SFC) secured by a mortgage on 800 sq. yards of its 1100 sq. yards industrial land. After the industrial unit became sick and defaulted, the SFC issued a notice under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, seeking t

DEEPAK BHANDARIversusHIMACHAL PRADESH STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED

2014 INSC 6529 January 2014Dismissed

Deepak Bhandari, a director and guarantor of a defaulting industrial company, challenged a suit filed by Himachal Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. for recovery of a loan balance. The corporation had taken possession of the company's mortgaged assets under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporati

FERTILIZER CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED & ORS.versusM/S COROMANDAL SACKS PRIVATE LIMITED

2024 INSC 34826 April 2024Disposed off

M/s Coromandal Sacks supplied HDPE bags to Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd (FCIL) and sued for recovery of unpaid amounts, alleging price differences, liquidated damages, penalties and loss of unsold bags. FCIL contended it was a sick industrial company under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act,

BIHAR STATE FINANCIAL CORPN. AND ORS.versusMIS. CHEMICOT INDIA PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

2006 INSC 55024 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The Bihar State Financial Corporation, a statutory body under the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, approved a loan to a small‑scale industrial unit and later agreed to an additional term loan of Rs 15 lakhs conditioned on the submission of a DGTD registration certificate. The loan agreement was registered withou

ZENITH STEEL TUBES AND INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ANR.versusSICOM LIMITED

2007 INSC 117221 November 2007Matter referred to larger bench

The appellants, a sick industrial company and its guarantor, sought to enforce a personal guarantee for a loan after the company defaulted. The respondent invoked Section 31(1)(aa) of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, while the guarantor claimed protection under Section 22(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies

EVEREST INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION & OTHERSversusGUJARAT STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

1987 INSC 18021 July 1987Disposed off

Everest Industrial Corporation borrowed Rs 6 lakhs from Gujarat State Financial Corporation under a hypothecation agreement that stipulated repayment in half‑yearly instalments and interest at 8.5% per annum. After defaulting, the corporation invoked section 31 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, and a compr

M/S. UNIQUE BUTYLE TUBE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.versusU.P. FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND ORS.

2002 INSC 57420 December 2002Appeal(s) allowed

U.P. Financial Corporation initiated recovery proceedings against Unique Butyle Tube Industries Pvt. Ltd. under the Uttar Pradesh Public Monies (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972 for default on a loan. The appellant contended that, after the enactment of the Recovery of Debts due to Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993,

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTDversusM/S PARAMOUNT POLYMERS PVT. LTD.

2006 INSC 73319 October 2006

M.L.L.C. Steels, a consumer of electricity, defaulted on dues and had its supply disconnected. The undertaking was taken over by the Haryana Financial Corporation and sold "as is where is" to Paramount Polymers. After the sale, the electricity board (Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd.) introduced clause 21A in its

K. C. NINANversusKERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.

2023 INSC 56019 May 2023Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a batch of appeals concerning whether electricity arrears of a previous owner can be recovered from a subsequent owner who acquired the premises through auction or other transfers. It held that the duty of a distribution licensee to supply electricity under Section 43 of the Electricity Act,

INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT BANK OF INDIA LTD.versusBISHWANATH JHUNJHUNWALA

2009 INSC 105318 August 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The Industrial Investment Bank of India Ltd. (the bank) granted two short‑term working capital loans to Modern Maileables Ltd., with the company's director, Bishwanath Jhunjhunwala, executing a personal guarantee. After the borrower defaulted, the bank initiated attachment proceedings against the company under s.40 of

ORISSA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND ANR.versusM/S. HOTEL JOGENDRA

1996 INSC 54918 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Orissa State Financial Corporation (OSFC) had advanced a loan of Rs. 14.68 lakh to M/s Hotel Jogendra for hotel construction, with a scheduled repayment over 18 years. The hotel defaulted, leading to a re‑phasing order under the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, which the hotel failed to comply with, promptin

M/S. S.J.S. BUSINESS ENTERPRISES (P) LTD.versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

2004 INSC 18117 March 2004Leave Granted & Allowed

The appellant, S.J.S. Business Enterprises Ltd., had obtained a loan from Bihar State Credit and Investment Corporation Ltd. (BICICO) for a hotel project but defaulted, prompting BICICO to invoke Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 to sell the hotel. After a series of valuations, BICICO issued a se

M/S. BAKEMANS INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.versusM/S. NEW CAWNPORE FLOUR MILLS AND OTHERS

2008 INSC 72716 May 2008

Bakemans Industries Pvt. Ltd. (the appellant) defaulted on a loan from SICOM Ltd. under the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951. SICOM invoked Section 29 of that Act to take possession of the appellant's factory and sought sale of the assets, while the appellant and other creditors filed winding‑up applications befo

STATE OF U.P. & ORS.versusM/S. SWADESHI POLYTEX LTD. & ORS.

2008 INSC 73216 May 2008Dismissed

Swadeshi Polytex Ltd., a sick company unable to pay employee wages, was subjected to attachment and auction of its property under the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. The company challenged the sale, arguing that the sale proclamation and auction notice were not served on the actual default

AHMEDABAD ELECTRICITY CO. LTD.versusGUJARAT INNS. PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

2004 INSC 17216 March 2004Dismissed

The respondents, who purchased urban properties at auction under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 and under the Official Liquidator in winding‑up proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956, sought fresh electricity connections for those premises. The appellant, Gujarat Electricity Board, demanded

HARYANA FINANCIAL CORPORATION & ANR.versusRAJESH GUPTA

2009 INSC 130615 December 2009Dismissed

The Haryana Financial Corporation (HFC) advertised an auction of a defaulting unit’s land and accepted a Rs.2.5 lakh earnest deposit from Rajesh Gupta, the highest bidder. Gupta discovered that the plot lacked an independent access road and repeatedly requested clarification and plans, but HFC failed to respond and lat

KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATIONversusVINCENT PAUL & ANR.

2011 INSC 20414 March 2011Disposed off

The Kerala Financial Corporation (KFC) took over a defaulting borrower under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 and invited tenders for the sale of the borrower’s assets. Vincent Paul submitted the sole tender, paid earnest money and was later offered a price of Rs. 8.25 lakh subject to conditions

KARNATAKA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATIONversusN. NARASIMAHAIAH AND ORS.

2008 INSC 35313 March 2008Dismissed

The Karnataka State Financial Corporation (KSFC) had granted a loan to an industrial concern and obtained personal guarantees and hypothecated properties from its directors. When the industrial concern defaulted, KSFC invoked Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 to take possession of the guarantors'

BIHAR STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATIONversusM/S. CHHOTANAGPUR MINERALS AND ORS.

2008 INSC 143112 December 2008Dismissed

The Bihar State Financial Corporation (BSFC) granted a loan to Mis. Chhotanagpur Minerals, which mortgaged lease‑hold rights over a factory site. After the borrower defaulted, BSFC invoked Sections 29 and 30 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 and sold the factory premises to a third party, also removing othe

MAHESH CHANDRAversusREGIONAL MANAGER, U.P. FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND ORS.

1992 INSC 4212 February 1992Appeal(s) allowed

Mahesh Chandra, the managing partner of a rice mill, hypothecated his mill and adjoining plots to the Uttar Pradesh Financial Corporation (UPFC) for a loan. After defaulting on repayments, UPFC exercised its power under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, took possession of the hypothecated proper

THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATIONversusGAR RE-ROLLING MILLS AND ANR.

1994 INSC 6410 February 1994

The Andhra Pradesh State Financial Corporation (the appellant) had advanced loans to Gar Re‑rolling Mills (the respondent) which defaulted, leading the corporation to first obtain an order under Section 31 of the State Financial Corporations Act and later to invoke Section 29 to sell the mortgaged concern. The High Cou

M/S. AMAR ALCOHOLI LTD.versusSICOM LTD. AND ANR.

2005 INSC 5498 November 2005Dismissed

Mis. Amar Alcohol Ltd. obtained a Rs.90‑lakh loan from SI Com Ltd., a State Financial Corporation (SFC) originally 100% owned by the Maharashtra Government. After the government reduced its share to 49%, the borrower defaulted and SI Com invoked Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 to take possessio

MAGANLAL ETC.versusJAISWAL INDUSTRIES NEEMACH & ORS.

1989 INSC 2287 August 1989Appeal(s) allowed

Maganlal mortgaged his property to M.P. State Financial Corporation. When the loan defaulted, the corporation invoked Sections 31 and 32 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 to attach and sell the property. The first purchaser (Jaiswal Industries) obtained the sale, which was set aside, re‑sold to a second pur

BANK OF MAHARASHTRAversusPANDURANG KESHAV GORWARDKAR & ORS

2013 INSC 3177 May 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The Bank of Maharashtra obtained a recovery certificate against Paper and Pulp Conversions Ltd. and, through the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT), sold the company's movable assets, retaining a portion of the proceeds. The company was subsequently ordered to be wound up and an official liquidator was appointed. The workmen

RAJASTHAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND ANR.versusTHE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR AND ANR.

2005 INSC 4815 October 2005Disposed off

The Rajasthan Financial Corporation and the Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation, as secured creditors of Vikas Woolen Mills Ltd., sought to sell the company's assets outside the winding‑up proceeding under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act and to distribute the net proceed

M/S. MUTHOOT LEASING AND FINANCE LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

2023 INSC 53 January 2023Appeal(s) allowed

Muthoot Leasing and Finance Ltd and another, classified as credit institutions, challenged the levy of interest tax on the interest component embedded in hire‑purchase instalments under the Interest‑Tax Act, 1974. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that hire‑purchase agreements are composite transactions wit

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS) KANPUR AND ANR.versusCANARA BANK

2018 INSC 5632 July 2018Dismissed

Canara Bank paid interest on fixed deposits to the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) without deducting tax at source under Section 194A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer treated the bank as a defaulter and issued a demand notice, which the bank appealed, relying on Notification dated 2

U.P. FINANCIAL CORPORATIONversusGEM CAP (INDIA) PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

1993 INSC 752 March 1993Appeal(s) allowed

U.P. Financial Corporation (U.P.F.C.) granted a loan of Rs. 29.70 lakhs to Gem Cap (India) Pvt. Ltd., which soon became a sick unit and defaulted on repayments. U.P.F.C. issued a notice under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 to take over the unit for recovery of Rs. 38.57 lakhs, prompting the co

PUNJAB FINANCIAL CORPORATIONversusM/S. SURYA AUTO INDUSTRIES

2009 INSC 12651 December 2009Appeal(s) allowed

Punjab Financial Corporation (PFC) had granted a term loan of Rs 24.25 lakh to M/s Surya Auto Industries, secured by mortgage of immovable property. The borrower defaulted, paying only Rs 2.70 lakh, ignored several statutory notices and refused concessions offered by PFC. PFC invoked Section 29 of the State Financial C

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search