Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

SAHYADRI CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

2016 INSC 27728 March 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Sahyadri Co‑operative Credit Society Ltd. and Navhind Co‑operative Credit Society Ltd., had advanced loans to sugar factories Daulat Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. and Tasgaonkar Sugar Mills Ltd. and obtained a pledge over sugar stock as security. When the factories defaulted, the Commissioner o

WEST U.P. SUGAR MILLS ASSOCIATION & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.

2020 INSC 34622 April 2020Reference answered

The Supreme Court examined a reference concerning whether the Uttar Pradesh government could fix a State Advised Price (SAP) for sugarcane under Section 16 of the U.P. Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953 and whether such power conflicted with the Central government's authority to fix a minimum price

SUGAR MILLS ASSOCIATION & ORS .versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.

2012 INSC 3317 January 2012Matter referred to larger bench

The Supreme Court examined a series of civil appeals concerning the payment of outstanding principal amounts to sugarcane growers by sugar factories in Uttar Pradesh. The crux of the dispute was whether the State Government could fix a State Advised Price (SAP) for sugarcane that exceeds the minimum price fixed by the

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search