HARDEEP SINGH SOHAL ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH CBI
2004 INSC 55728 September 2004Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, doctors Hardeep Singh Sohal and Surinder Singh Sandhu, were convicted for the murder of Dr. Megh Raj Goel based largely on a confession recorded from the alleged conspirator Balwinder Singh under Section 15 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) and extra‑judicial confessions…
AYYUB ETC.versusSTATE OF U.P.
2002 INSC 10828 February 2002Case Partly allowed
The appellants, Ayyub and Abdul Jabbar, were convicted by a Designated TADA Court for throwing bombs at a police picket, causing one death and several injuries, and were sentenced under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA), the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Damage to Property Act. A…
STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusFAZAL REHMAN ABDUL
2013 INSC 18121 March 2013Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined 19 appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra against acquittals in the 1993 Bombay serial bomb blast case, focusing on conspiracy charges under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) and the Indian Penal Code. It reiterated the limited circumstances in which an appell…
BIHARI MANJHI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR
2002 INSC 20015 April 2002Appeal(s) allowed
In a case of gruesome carnage in Bihar that left 35 dead, the Designated Court convicted several accused under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) and the Indian Penal Code based solely on a confessional statement of Bihari Manjhi recorded by a police inspector. The statement was taken…
STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusBHARAT CHAGANLAL RAGHANA AND ORS.
2001 INSC 28911 July 2001Case Partly allowed
The State of Maharashtra appealed the acquittal of B.C. Raghani (A1), Subhash Bind (A5) and Shekhar Kadam (A6) in a contract‑killing case involving the murder of businessman Pradeep Jain. The prosecution’s case hinged on confessional statements of A5 and A6 recorded by a DCP under Section 15 of the Terrorist and Disrup…
LAL SINGH ETC. ETCversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.
2001 INSC 139 January 2001Case Partly allowed
The Supreme Court examined the convictions of five appellants under Section 3(3) of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) for alleged conspiracy to commit terrorist acts, the recovery of large quantities of arms, ammunition and explosives, and related offences under the IPC, Explosive Substanc…
STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusSIRAZ AHMED NISAR AHMED AND ORS.
2007 INSC 5257 May 2007Disposed off
The State of Maharashtra alleged that a gang led by Chota Shakeel conspired to murder politician Ramdas Nayak, arranging vehicles, firearms and ammunition. The Designated Court acquitted all accused of the murder and related offences, convicting only three of them under the Arms Act for possession of prohibited weapons…