Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6
The landlord appealed against lower courts that had refused to include the portion of land on which the tenant, with the landlord's permission, had erected a building for the purpose of fixing fair rent under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1960. The issue was whether such land …
The respondent filed two revision petitions against a High Court order under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent) Control Act, 1960, but applied for a certified copy of the order after the 30‑day limitation period had expired. The Supreme Court held that, under Section 12(2) of the Limitation …
The appellant, Lakshmi Narayanan, obtained an ex parte eviction decree against tenant S.S. Pandian under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1960 and filed an execution petition. During execution proceedings the parties compromised: the tenant surrendered part of the premises and …
The landlord (Davis) owned a building where he ran a hotel‑bar and sought eviction of his tenant (Sebastian), who operated a provision shop, under Section 11(8) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, claiming a bona‑fide need for additional accommodation for a jewellery and …
The tenant, V. Radhakrishnan, occupied a non‑residential building owned by S.N. Loganatha Mudaliar, who filed an eviction petition on the grounds of alleged rent default and a bonafide personal requirement to set up his son’s business. The Rent Controller dismissed the petition, finding no default …
The landlord, who ran a leather business, sought eviction of his tenant under section 10(3)(a)(iii) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1960, claiming a bona‑fide need for the premises for the business of his two sons. The sons had entered into a partnership with unrelated …
