K. S. SOUNDARARAJAN AND ORS.versusCOMMISSIONER OF H.R. & C.E.AND ORS.
2015 INSC 85324 November 2015Dismissed
Sundararaja Naidu's 1949 will bequeathed certain properties and directed his brother's son to manage them and perform specific charitable rites. Five members of the testator's community applied under Section 64 of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 to have a scheme framed for those chari…
W. N. ALLAL SUNDARAMversusTHE COMMISSIONER H.R. & C.E. ADMN. DEPARTMENT & ORS.
2019 INSC 127422 November 2019Dismissed
The appellant, W.N. Allal Sundaram, challenged a declaration that the Bagyammal Trust was a public trust under the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, asserting it was a private family trust. The dispute centered on a Deed of Settlement dated 4 June 1926, which entrusted the construction and…
PARASAMAYA KOLERINATHA MADAM, TIRUNELVELIversusP. NATESA ACHARI & ORS.
2011 INSC 70222 September 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Parasamaya Kolerinatha Math, sued the defendants for declaration of title and possession of a Chennai property that housed the Meenakshiamman idol and the founder's statue. The defendants claimed the premises was a public temple belonging to the Viswakarma community. The High Court Single Judge held the …
M/S NATESAN AGENCIES (PLANTATIONS)versusSTATE REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS DEPARTMENT
2019 INSC 92120 August 2019Dismissed
M/S Natesan Agencies (a partnership firm) leased 197.36 acres of land from a Mutt for plantation. The land was included in a wildlife sanctuary by a notification under Section 18 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 in 1976, after which a second 25‑year lease was purportedly executed in 1978. The State later excluded…
THE IDOL OF SRI RENGANATHASWAMY REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, JOINT COMMISSIONERversusPK THOPPULAN CHETTIAR, RAMANUJA KOODAM ANANDHANA TRUST, REP. BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE AND ORS.
2020 INSC 21319 February 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, the idol of Sri Renganathaswamy, challenged a suit filed by the Anandhana Trust seeking civil‑court permission to sell a portion of a property that had been endowed for charitable activities associated with the deity. The central question was whether the 1901 Deed of Settlement created a ‘specific endowm…
ADI SAIVA SIVACHARIYARGAL NALA SANGAM & ORS.versusTHE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU &ANR.
2015 INSC 92916 December 2015Disposed off
The petitioners challenged a Government Order (G.O. No.118 dated 23‑05‑2006) that any Hindu with requisite qualifications could be appointed as an Archaka in Hindu temples, arguing that it violated Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution. The Court examined whether the appointment of Archakas must follow the prescriptio…
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.versusELEPHANT G. RAJENDRAN & ORS. ETC.
2019 INSC 52312 April 2019Case Partly allowed
The Tamil Nadu government, after receiving a complaint from the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Commissioner, ordered on 01.08.2018 that all idol‑theft investigations being handled by the Idol Wing of the CID be transferred to the CBI. The Madras High Court quashed that order and, under Article 226, appointed…
R. M. SUNDARAM @ MEENAKSHISUNDARAMversusSRI KAYAROHANASAMY AND NEELAYADHAKSHI AMMAN TEMPLE (THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER) NAGAPATTINAM, TAMIL NADU
2022 INSC 66511 July 2022Dismissed
The appellant claimed that 26 pieces of suit jewellery kept in the temple's Kudavarai were his personal inheritance as the adopted son of Muthuthandapani Chettiar and sought exclusive possession. The respondent temple argued that the jewellery had been donated by the ancestors of Muthuthandapani as a specific endowment…
DR. K. S. PALANISAMI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusHINDU COMMUNITY IN GENERAL AND CITIZENS OF GOBICHETTIPALAYAM AND OTHERS
2017 INSC 2219 March 2017Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined a dispute arising from a 1968 joint and mutual will executed by a husband and wife, which earmarked their properties for charitable purposes and granted the surviving spouse absolute rights to deal with the property. The Court held that the suit was not barred by Section 108 of the Tamil Nadu…
THULASIRAMAN AND ANOTHERversusTHE COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS & CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT ADMINISTRATION AND ANOTHER
2019 INSC 9903 September 2019Dismissed
The appellants claimed that the Bakers Choultry, a historic building in Chennai, was their private property, while the respondents argued it was a specific endowment under the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959. The dispute centered on the interpretation of a 1834 rock inscription that direc…