NELLOR MARTHANDAM VELLALAR AND ORS.versusTHE COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS AND ORS.
2003 INSC 34530 July 2003Dismissed
The appellants, members of the Vellala community, claimed that the Sree Uchini Makali Amman Temple in Nalloor was a denominational temple belonging to their community and therefore entitled to protection under Article 26 of the Constitution and Section 107 of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act…
JOINT COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS, ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENTversusJAYARAMAN AND ORS.
2005 INSC 52726 October 2005Appeal(s) allowed
The appeal concerned four acres of government land that had been granted to four temples for the purpose of generating income for poojas and temple maintenance. The descendants of the original poojari obtained hereditary trustee status under Section 63(b) of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (HR&…
R. MURALI AND ORS.versusKANYAKA P. DEVASTHANAM AND CHARITIES AND ORS.
2005 INSC 31025 July 2005Dismissed
The appellants, R. Murali and others, sought leave under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure to file a suit for modifying the scheme of administration of the Sri Kanyaka Parameshwari Devasthanam and Charities, alleging mismanagement by the current Board of Trustees. The trustees opposed, contending that the Tamil…
K. S. SOUNDARARAJAN AND ORS.versusCOMMISSIONER OF H.R. & C.E.AND ORS.
2015 INSC 85324 November 2015Dismissed
Sundararaja Naidu's 1949 will bequeathed certain properties and directed his brother's son to manage them and perform specific charitable rites. Five members of the testator's community applied under Section 64 of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 to have a scheme framed for those chari…
W. N. ALLAL SUNDARAMversusTHE COMMISSIONER H.R. & C.E. ADMN. DEPARTMENT & ORS.
2019 INSC 127422 November 2019Dismissed
The appellant, W.N. Allal Sundaram, challenged a declaration that the Bagyammal Trust was a public trust under the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, asserting it was a private family trust. The dispute centered on a Deed of Settlement dated 4 June 1926, which entrusted the construction and…
PARASAMAYA KOLERINATHA MADAM, TIRUNELVELIversusP. NATESA ACHARI & ORS.
2011 INSC 70222 September 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Parasamaya Kolerinatha Math, sued the defendants for declaration of title and possession of a Chennai property that housed the Meenakshiamman idol and the founder's statue. The defendants claimed the premises was a public temple belonging to the Viswakarma community. The High Court Single Judge held the …
A.T.S. CHINNASWAMI CHETTIAR ETCversusSRI KARI VARADARAJA PERUMAL TEMPLE AND ANR.
1995 INSC 59422 September 1995Dismissed
The Sri Kari Varadaraja Perumal Temple held a devadayan religious inam of 19.58 acres, granted permanently and confirmed by a title deed in 1863. After the Tamil Nadu Minor Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1963 abolished minor inams, both the temple and the appellants applied for Ryotwari patta. The …
M/S NATESAN AGENCIES (PLANTATIONS)versusSTATE REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT ENVIRONMENT AND FORESTS DEPARTMENT
2019 INSC 92120 August 2019Dismissed
M/S Natesan Agencies (a partnership firm) leased 197.36 acres of land from a Mutt for plantation. The land was included in a wildlife sanctuary by a notification under Section 18 of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 in 1976, after which a second 25‑year lease was purportedly executed in 1978. The State later excluded…
THE IDOL OF SRI RENGANATHASWAMY REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, JOINT COMMISSIONERversusPK THOPPULAN CHETTIAR, RAMANUJA KOODAM ANANDHANA TRUST, REP. BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE AND ORS.
2020 INSC 21319 February 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, the idol of Sri Renganathaswamy, challenged a suit filed by the Anandhana Trust seeking civil‑court permission to sell a portion of a property that had been endowed for charitable activities associated with the deity. The central question was whether the 1901 Deed of Settlement created a ‘specific endowm…
ADI SAIVA SIVACHARIYARGAL NALA SANGAM & ORS.versusTHE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU &ANR.
2015 INSC 92916 December 2015Disposed off
The petitioners challenged a Government Order (G.O. No.118 dated 23‑05‑2006) that any Hindu with requisite qualifications could be appointed as an Archaka in Hindu temples, arguing that it violated Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution. The Court examined whether the appointment of Archakas must follow the prescriptio…
BABA CHARAN DASS UDHASIversusMAHANT BASANT DAS BABAJI CHELA BABA LAXMANDAS UDASI SADHU
2000 INSC 33614 July 2000Dismissed
The dispute concerned the appointment of the Madathipathi (head) of the Shiva Kanchi Udasi Math, Kanchipuram. The Math was founded by a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, and its deed stipulated that succession should follow the Sishya Parampara (guru‑to‑disciple). After the death of the las…
THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.versusELEPHANT G. RAJENDRAN & ORS. ETC.
2019 INSC 52312 April 2019Case Partly allowed
The Tamil Nadu government, after receiving a complaint from the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Commissioner, ordered on 01.08.2018 that all idol‑theft investigations being handled by the Idol Wing of the CID be transferred to the CBI. The Madras High Court quashed that order and, under Article 226, appointed…
R. M. SUNDARAM @ MEENAKSHISUNDARAMversusSRI KAYAROHANASAMY AND NEELAYADHAKSHI AMMAN TEMPLE (THROUGH ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER) NAGAPATTINAM, TAMIL NADU
2022 INSC 66511 July 2022Dismissed
The appellant claimed that 26 pieces of suit jewellery kept in the temple's Kudavarai were his personal inheritance as the adopted son of Muthuthandapani Chettiar and sought exclusive possession. The respondent temple argued that the jewellery had been donated by the ancestors of Muthuthandapani as a specific endowment…
S. PITCHAI GANAPATHY AND ORS.versusCOMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT AND ORS.
2001 INSC 43410 September 2001Dismissed
The appellants claimed that two ancient shrines in Madurai were private family temples, asserting continuous possession as hereditary pujaris and trustees, while the respondents contended that the shrines were public temples forming part of the Meenakshi Sundereswarar Temple. The dispute was examined under the Tamil Na…
DR. K. S. PALANISAMI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusHINDU COMMUNITY IN GENERAL AND CITIZENS OF GOBICHETTIPALAYAM AND OTHERS
2017 INSC 2219 March 2017Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined a dispute arising from a 1968 joint and mutual will executed by a husband and wife, which earmarked their properties for charitable purposes and granted the surviving spouse absolute rights to deal with the property. The Court held that the suit was not barred by Section 108 of the Tamil Nadu…
THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ARTHANARESWARAR TEMPLEversusR. SATHYAMOORTHY AND ORS.
1999 INSC 499 February 1999Appeal(s) allowed
The hereditary trustees of six Hindu temples filed a petition under the Indian Trusts Act seeking permission to sell temple properties, which was rejected by the District Court and initially dismissed by the High Court. The High Court later allowed a review and permitted the sale, but the Commissioner under the Tamil N…
R.V.F VENKATACHALA GOUNDERversusARULMIGU VISWESARASWAMI AND V.P. TEMPLE AND ANR.
2003 INSC 5328 October 2003Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a hereditary trustee of a temple, claimed ownership of a shop adjoining the temple and sued for declaration of title, possession and three years' rent arrears. The trial court and first appellate court upheld his claim based on oral testimony, rent agreements, ledger books and a charity commissioner’s or…
COMMISSIONER OF HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT (ADMN.), MADRAS AND ANR.versusVEDANTHA STHAPNA SABHA
2004 INSC 3727 May 2004Appeal(s) allowed
The Vedanta Sthapna Sabha, a society that constructed a temple with contributions from its members and the government, applied under Section 63(b) of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, seeking a declaration that it was the hereditary trustee of the temple. The Deputy Commissioner dismis…
THAYARAMMAL (DEAD) BY LR.versusKANAKAMMAL AND ORS.
2004 INSC 6986 December 2004Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined a dispute over property dedicated as a Dharmachatram (choultry) by a Hindu donor in 1805. The plaintiffs claimed occupancy as trustees, while the defendants asserted title obtained through a court sale. The Court held that such dedication creates a charitable endowment, not a trust, and there…
THULASIRAMAN AND ANOTHERversusTHE COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS & CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT ADMINISTRATION AND ANOTHER
2019 INSC 9903 September 2019Dismissed
The appellants claimed that the Bakers Choultry, a historic building in Chennai, was their private property, while the respondents argued it was a specific endowment under the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959. The dispute centered on the interpretation of a 1834 rock inscription that direc…
T. LAKSHMIKUMARA THATHACHARIARversusCOMMISSIONER, H.R.C.E. AND ORS.
1998 INSC 3412 September 1998Dismissed
The case concerned a scheme for the administration of the Devarajaswamy Temple at Kancheepuram, originally settled in 1909 under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure and modified in 1941 under the Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Act, 1927. In 1982 the Deputy Commissioner of Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowme…
THE COMMISSIONER, HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, MADRASversusSMT. P.S. SETHURATHINAM
1999 INSC 322 February 1999Case Partly allowed
The Deputy Commissioner of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department modified a scheme of the Sri Bhavani Amman Temple under Section 45(3) of the Act, which the Madras High Court held to be beyond his jurisdiction because the scheme had been framed by a civil court under Section 64(5) and Sect…
B.K.C. MURUGA KONAR (DEAD)) BY LRS. & ORS.versusV. SETHA KONE & ORS.
1989 INSC 2631 September 1989Dismissed
Members of the Thousand‑Yadhava community filed a representative suit against the trustee of two temples seeking a decree for the rendition of true accounts and payment of amounts due. The defendants contended that the temples were public religious endowments under the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowmen…