Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5 judgments · newest first · showing 1–5
The appellant's mother, Lakshmi, was detained under Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug‑Offenders, Forest‑Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic‑Offenders and Slum‑Grabbers Act, 1982 while she was already in judicial remand under the Tamil Nadu …
Mohan Breweries & Distilleries Ltd. and others manufacture Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) under licences, while the Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC) has exclusive wholesale rights. The appellants argued that, under Rule 22 of the Tamil Nadu Indian Made Foreign Spirits (Manufacture) …
The appellants, manufacturers and dealers of Ayurvedic and Unani medicines, challenged the validity of the Tamil Nadu Spirituous Preparations (Control) Rules, 1984, which require licences for the sale of any medicinal preparation containing alcohol or intoxicating drugs. They argued that the rules …
The appellants, licence holders for retail vending of Indian Made Foreign Spirits, were allowed to obtain bar licences under the Tamil Nadu Liquor (Retail Vending in Bar) Rules, 1992. After law‑and‑order problems, the State of Tamil Nadu rescinded those Bar Rules by a government order, effectively …
The Madras High Court, on a petition under Art. 226, quashed the Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise’s order rejecting two licence applications and, by mandamus, directed the Commissioner to grant a licence to Majestic Bottling Company despite the requirement of prior State Government approval …
