Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Telecommunications Act, 2023

4 judgments · newest first · showing 1–4

TALIBversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant sought anticipatory bail and requested permission to approach the concerned court for regular bail, seeking protection of his interests for a short period. The learned Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the prayer. The court directed that the applicant may appear …

VISHAL TEJHBAHADUR YADAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered two bail applications filed by Vishal Jadhav and Durgesh Sarwjeet Singh, accused of operating an illegal call centre that allegedly defrauded Canadian nationals. The prosecution charged them under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Prevention of …

DURGESH SARWJET SINGHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered two bail applications filed by Vishal Yadav and Durgesh Singh, accused of operating an illegal call centre that allegedly defrauded Canadian nationals. They were charged under multiple provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the …

AMAN BHOLA SINGHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Aman Bhola Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre‑arrest bail in a case alleging illegal diversion of international telephone calls through a company called M/s Maindoevuvers Solutions Pvt. Ltd. The …