Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Terrorist & Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987

3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3

SAHIB SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA

1997 INSC 578Appeal(s) allowed

Sahib Singh was convicted under the IPC and TADA for the murder of Om Prakash based on the testimony of three brothers—sons of the deceased—and a confession recorded under Section 15 of the TADA Act. The Supreme Court examined whether relatives of the deceased are competent witnesses, the effect of …

THE STATE OF GUJARATversusANIRUDHSING AND ANR.

[1997] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 234

The State of Gujarat appealed the acquittal of Anirudhsing Mahipatsingh Jadeja (Accused No.1) and Nilesh Kumar (Accused No.2) for the murder of MLA Popatbhai Sorathiya during an Independence Day ceremony. The trial court had held that the prosecution failed to prove the accused's presence, the …

USMANBHAI DAWOODBHAI MENON & ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1988 INSC 74Case Partly allowed

The appellants, Usmanbhai Menon and others, were arrested after an armed clash and produced before a Designated Court under the Terrorist & Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA). Their bail applications were rejected by the Designated Court, and they sought bail from the Gujarat High …