Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1995

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

UNION OF INDIAversusNARESHKUMAR BADRIKUMAR JAGAD & ORS.

2018 INSC 111428 November 2018Disposed off

The original lease of a 99‑year term on a plot in Mumbai, used for a cotton mill, later vested in a charitable trust. After the lease expired, Podar Mills occupied the premises as a protected tenant under the Bombay Rents Act. The Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1995 vested the statutory tenancy rights in t

THE NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD.versusNARESHKUMAR BADRIKUMAR JAGAD & ORS.

2011 INSC 6515 September 2011Dismissed

The National Textile Corporation Ltd. (NTC) occupied premises that were originally leased to Poddar Mills, a textile undertaking taken over by the Central Government under the Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1995. The owners of the premises filed an eviction suit under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999

UCO BANKversusNATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.

2020 INSC 2825 March 2020Case Partly allowed

UCO Bank (appellant) sought recovery of a large sum from Shree Sitaram Mills Ltd. and its successor National Textile Corporation Ltd. (NTC) after the mill was taken over and nationalised under the Textile Undertakings (Take‑over of Management) Act, 1983 and the Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1995. The bank

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search