Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Textile Undertakings (Taking over of Management) Act, 1983

8 judgments · newest first · showing 1–8

UNION OF INDIAversusNARESHKUMAR BADRIKUMAR JAGAD & ORS.

2018 INSC 1114Disposed off

The original lease of a 99‑year term on a plot in Mumbai, used for a cotton mill, later vested in a charitable trust. After the lease expired, Podar Mills occupied the premises as a protected tenant under the Bombay Rents Act. The Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1995 vested the statutory …

NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION (MN) LTD.versusM/S DURGA TRADING CO. AND ORS.

2015 INSC 965Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute concerned land that respondent No.1 claimed to have bought from Sitaram Mills Ltd. (SSML) under an unregistered 1975 agreement to sell, for which full consideration was paid and possession taken. The textile undertaking of SSML was taken over by the Central Government under the Textile …

CUSTODIAN OF TEXTILES UNDERTAKING, BOMBAYversusHALL & ANDERSON LTD. & ORS.

2011 INSC 52Dismissed

Hall & Anderson Ltd., originally a departmental store in Calcutta, purchased a textile mill in Bombay in 1950 and later operated both businesses separately. The textile mill was nationalised under the Textile Undertakings (Taking Over of Management) Act, 1983 and the Textile Undertaking …

NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPN. LTD. AND ORS.versusM/S. HARIBOX SWALRAM AND ORS.

2004 INSC 233Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners had advance contracts with two Bombay textile mills for cloth, but after the mills were taken over by the Central Government under the Textile Undertakings (Taking over of Management) Act, 1983, the custodian claimed the contracts were cancelled and it bore no liability for …

UNION OF INDIAversusELPLLLNSTONE SPINNING AND WEAVING CO. LTD. & ORS. ETC.

2001 INSC 15Appeal(s) allowed

In 1983 the Government of India, responding to a prolonged textile strike, promulgated an Ordinance and later an Act to take over the management of thirteen textile mills pending their nationalisation. Three Bombay mills – Elphinstone Spinning & Weaving, Jam Manufacturing and New City – challenged …

NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION (SM) LTD.versusASSOCIATED BUILDING CO. LTD. AND ORS.

1995 INSC 650Dismissed

The Tata Mills Ltd occupied an undivided, undemarcated portion of Bombay House, owned by Associated Building Co., without a specific lease and had been using the space gratuitously after stopping payment of compensation. After the Textile Undertakings (Taking Over of Management) Act, 1983 vested …

NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD. & ORS.versusSITARAM MILLS LTD. & ORS. ETC.

1986 INSC 61Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the surplus lands owned by Shree Sitaram Mills formed part of the "assets in relation to the textile undertaking" under sub‑section (2) of section 3 of the Textile Undertakings (Taking Over of Management) Act, 1983. The mill, a sick textile undertaking, had been …