Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Trade Unions Act, 1926

23 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

MAHARASHTRA GIRNI KAMGAR UNIONversusS. BHATTACHARJI AND ORS.

1999 INSC 36631 August 1999Dismissed

The Maharashtra Girni Kamgar Union (appellant) sought cancellation of the registration of respondent No.4 union as a representative union under Section 15(b)(ii) of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946, alleging that its membership fell below the 25% statutory minimum for a continuous three‑month period. The dispu

BOROSIL GLASS WORKS LTD. EMPLOYEES' UNIONversusD.D. BAMBODE AND ORS.

2000 INSC 55730 November 2000Appeal(s) allowed

The Borosil Glass Works Ltd. Employees' Union, a registered trade union, rejected the joint membership application of D.D. Bambode and others because the applications did not follow the union's procedure. Bambode filed a complaint under Section 28(1A) of the Trade Unions Act, 1926, seeking a consent certificate, but th

KARBHARI AND OTHERSversusDEEPAK V. CHENGEDE AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 83430 July 2019Dismissed

The Kopargaon Taluka Sakhar Kamgar Sabha, a representative union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, held elections for its Managing Committee. The Election Officer introduced an election programme that created separate electoral colleges for each of the seven units and reserved eight seats for women and the r

HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD.versusDAN BAHADUR SINGH AND ORS.

2007 INSC 49227 April 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, a union of daily‑rated gardeners employed by Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd., a government company, sought regularisation, continuance of service and equal pay, alleging that they had worked more than 240 days a year for several years and that artificial breaks were created to deny them permanence. The Alla

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.versusM.T.S.S.D. WORKERS UNION & ORS.

1988 INSC 2727 January 1988Dismissed

The Union of India appealed a Bombay High Court judgment that had quashed an order dividing electoral constituencies for the election of a Works Committee under the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957. The order sought to create multiple constituencies to represent various sections of workers, even though the M.T

B.R. SINGH & ORS. ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1989 INSC 29326 September 1989Case Allowed

The Trade Fair Authority of India Employees' Union demanded housing, regularisation of casual workers and wage revision, but management failed to act, leading the Union to call a one‑day strike on 21 January 1987 after a denied request for a general body meeting. Management responded by suspending and later dismissing

M/S. ORCHID EMPLOYEES' UNION & ORS.versusM/S. ORCHID CHEMICALS & PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.

2008 INSC 39425 March 2008Disposed off

The Orchid Employees' Union sought an interim injunction restraining its members from assembling within 100 metres of the company's premises and from obstructing traffic, which was initially granted by a District Munsif. The Madras High Court set aside that injunction, noting a pending cancellation of the union under t

R.G. D'SOUZAversusPOONA EMPLOYEES UNION &ANR.

2014 INSC 78618 November 2014Dismissed

The appellant, a former president of the Poona Employees Union, sought cancellation of the union's registration certificate alleging fraud or mistake, filing a petition under Section 10 of the Trade Unions Act, 1926. The Additional Registrar cancelled the certificate, the Industrial Court set aside that cancellation, a

AIR INDIA CABIN CREW ASSN. & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2011 INSC 80817 November 2011Dismissed

The Air India Cabin Crew Association challenged the management’s revised promotion policy and the government’s 2003 directive that equalised the retirement and flying ages of male Flight Pursers and female Air Hostesses. The petitioners argued that these changes violated earlier bilateral settlements, the Air Corporati

FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA STAFF UNIONversusFOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 11717 February 1995Disposed off

The Food Corporation of India (FCI) had several registered trade unions and needed to select a sole bargaining agent. Both FCI and the unions agreed to use a secret ballot to determine which union(s) represented the majority of workers. The Supreme Court was asked to prescribe a procedure that would ensure a fair and r

CHARU KHURANA & OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2014 INSC 102410 November 2014Hearing Adjourned

The petitioners, female make‑up artists, challenged the Cine Costume Make‑up Artists and Hair Dressers Association's bye‑laws that barred women from obtaining make‑up artist cards and required a five‑year Maharashtra residence. The Court examined the constitutional guarantees of equality (Arts. 14, 15, 21), the right t

G.S. DHARA SINGHversusE.K. THOMAS & ORS.

1988 INSC 2109 August 1988Dismissed

The case concerned 85 workers who had resigned from the Cochin Port Thozhilali Union and sought a refund of amounts that the union, through its president‑treasurer G.S. Dhara Singh, had collected from the employer on their behalf for gratuity and accident benefit funds. The workers filed civil suits demanding an accoun

SHARMIK UTTARSH SABHAversusRAYMOND WOOLLEN MILLS LTD. AND ORS.

1995 INSC 1037 February 1995Dismissed

The appellant, Sharimk Uttarsah Sabha, a trade union, sought to be impleaded in an Industrial Court proceeding where Raymond Woolen Mills Ltd. had complained of unfair labour practices under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971. The Industrial Court had restrai

STATE BANK OF INDIA STAFF ASSOCIATIONversusSTATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 4793 April 1996Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether a retired employee of the State Bank of India, who had been elected General Secretary of the SBI Staff Association before his retirement, could continue to represent the union and negotiate with management. The appellants argued that Sections 6(e) and 22 of the Trade Unions Act, 1926

POONA EMPLOYEES UNIONversusFORCE MOTORS LIMITED & ANOTHER

2015 INSC 8761 December 2015Dismissed

The Poona Employees Union (PEU) applied to the Industrial Court for recognition in place of the existing recognized union, Bharatiya Kamgar Sena (BKS), claiming it had over 30% membership and a larger membership base during the relevant six‑month period. The Industrial Court, relying on the Investigating Officer's repo

FED. OF BANK OF INDIA STAFF UNIONS & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR

2019 INSC 3001 March 2019Dismissed

The Federation of Bank of India Staff Unions and an employee sought to have three workmen nominated as directors of the Bank of India under the Nationalised Banks (Management and Miscellaneous Provisions) Scheme, 1970. The Central Government rejected the panel because the candidates had less than three years of service

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search