Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Transaction of Business Rules, 1961

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

N.D.M.C. & ORS.versusMIS TANVI TRADING & CREDIT PVT. LTD. & ORS.

2008 INSC 98628 August 2008Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents sought sanction for a two‑and‑a‑half‑storey building with 15 dwelling units on a plot in the Lutyens' Bungalow Zone (LBZ) of Delhi. The New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) rejected the plans, citing violation of LBZ guidelines dated 8 February 1988 issued by the Ministry of Urban Development. The High Co

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusASHOK KUMAR AND ORS.

2005 INSC 50618 October 2005Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the removal of a Deputy Inspector General of the Border Security Force (BSF), Ashok Kumar, for misconduct during a raid, including falsifying his presence, suppressing seizure details and staging a fake encounter. A Staff Court of Inquiry found him delinquent and the Director General (DG) of BSF, dee

K. LAKSHMINARAYANANversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2018 INSC 11616 December 2018Leave granted

The petitioners challenged the nomination of three members to the Puducherry Legislative Assembly by the Central Government under Section 3(3) of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963, arguing that the Central Government must consult the Union Territory’s Council of Ministers or Chief Minister, that a constitut

CENTRE FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

2012 INSC 682 February 2012Case Allowed

The Supreme Court examined the allocation of 2G spectrum licences by the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) between September 2007 and March 2008, which were based on Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) recommendations to use the 2001 entry fee and a first‑come‑first‑served policy. Petitioners argued that

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search