Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
4 judgments · newest first · showing 1–4
The petition under Article 227 challenged an order of the Additional District Judge, Mathura, which had set aside a 2010 order rejecting a landlord's application under Section 21(1)(a) of the Uttar Pradesh Act No.13 of 1972 and allowed a release application. The petitioner, a tenant, contended that …
The petitioner, a landlord, filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kanpur Nagar, to decide a rent case (Rent Case No.12 of 2011 / New Rent Case No.1719 of 2022) within a stipulated time. The petitioner alleged that …
The petition under Article 227 challenged the Small Causes Court and the revisional court's orders that decreed eviction of the petitioner-tenant and awarded arrears of rent to the respondent-landlord. The petitioner claimed that the premises fell within the ambit of U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 because …
Jagdish Prasad, a tenant, was evicted by his landlord Angoori Devi on the allegation that he had sub‑let the premises to Pavan Trading Company. The trial court presumed sub‑letting solely from a photograph showing the son of the trading company’s proprietor in the shop, and ordered eviction. The …
