Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3
The petitioner, appointed as an Assistant Teacher in 1973 by the school’s Management and approved by the education officer in 1974, was later excluded from salary payments after the school came under the grant‑in‑aid scheme in 1991. The exclusion was based on the claim that she lacked the …
Smt. Anita Gupta filed a writ petition challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The respondents contended that a statutory remedy exists under Rule‑5 of the U.P. Basic Education Staff Rules, 1973, allowing an appeal to the Secretary, U.P. Basic Education Board, Prayagraj. The …
Smt. Seema Verma filed a writ petition challenging a decision of the State of U.P. and others, alleging that her grievances should be addressed without delay. The respondents argued that the petition was not maintainable because the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Rule 5 of the U.P. Basic …
