Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

U.P. Civil Laws (Reforms and Amendment) Act, 1976

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

TEHRI HYDRO DEV. CORPN. LTD.& ANR.versusJAI PRAKASH ASSO. LTD.

2012 INSC 42025 September 2012Case Partly allowed

The parties entered into a contract for works on the Tehri Hydro Dam project. After completion, the final bill and a security deposit of Rs.12.50 lakhs remained unpaid, leading to arbitration under the contract’s arbitration clause. The first arbitration awarded Rs.10.17 lakhs for the final bill but held the security‑d

STATE OF U.P.versusHARISH CHANDRA AND CO.

1998 INSC 42211 November 1998Disposed off

The State of U.P. entered into a contract with Harish Chandra & Co. for excavation and construction work, which the contractor failed to complete, leading the State to finish the work through other agencies and incur extra costs. The dispute over payment was referred to arbitration, where the arbitrator awarded interes

PT. RISHIKESH AND ANR. ETC.versusSMT. SALMA BEGUM ETC. ETC.

1995 INSC 3252 May 1995

The petitioners, tenants, challenged the validity of Order 15 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which had been inserted by the Uttar Pradesh Civil Laws (Amendment) Act, 1972 and later amended by the Uttar Pradesh Civil Laws (Reforms and Amendment) Act, 1976, on the ground that it was repugnant to the CPC Central (

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search