Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

CHHIDDA SINGHversusDY. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND ORS.

1998 INSC 10419 February 1998Dismissed

The petitioner, Chhidda Singh, filed a review petition (No. 315 of 1998) after the Supreme Court dismissed his Special Leave Petition (C) No. 6347 of 1997, which challenged orders of the Deputy Director of Consolidation and the High Court. The review petition merely reproduced verbatim the same grounds that had been ra

SURAJ PAL (D) THR. LR.versusRAM MANORATH & ORS.

2017 INSC 74111 August 2017Dismissed

The dispute concerned a plot of land used as 'Abadi' that had been declared 'Chakout', i.e., outside the Uttar Pradesh consolidation scheme. Four brothers were co‑tenure holders; one brother sold his one‑fourth share to the respondents. The remaining brothers sued for injunction, arguing that under Section 5(c)(ii) of

PREETAM SINGH (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.versusASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND ORS.

1996 INSC 439 January 1996Remitted to Lower Court

The dispute involved Bhoomidari rights over 38.25 acres in a village undergoing consolidation under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, where the Gaon Sabha objected to the appellants' entries in revenue records. The Consolidation Officer ordered expunction of the appellants' names, and the Settlement Officer reman

THAKUR PRASAD (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusRAJ KARAN (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.

2003 INSC 1434 March 2003Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a suit land in the former Banaras State that had been granted rent‑free (Krishnarpan) and later mortgaged by the mortgagors, who subsequently sold one‑sixth of the land to the mortgagees and the rest to other purchasers. After the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act was applied to

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search