Created by Fuzzy Cloud

U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act

22 judgments · newest first · showing 1–22

ROJ MOHAMMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Hafij Ali filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 08-09-2026 registered under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner was arrested in the very case. The petitioner, …

BRIJBHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Brijbhan, who was lodged in a case under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …

ASHISHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ashish, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking bail in two criminal matters pending before the Budhana police stations. He had been incarcerated since 9 April 2026 and was unable to furnish two separate sureties for each case due to poverty. The applicant …

SHAILENDRA KATIYARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Shailendra Katiyar, who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

VANSH GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vansh Goswami, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

VIJAY KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vijay Kumar, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 3(1) and 2(b)(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) …

IMRAN URF KALAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Imran Urf Kala, who is charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted that …

AMIT YADAV @ BUGGIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Amit Yadav under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with charges under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant asserted his innocence, …

PRAVEENversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Praveen who was charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …

KHUSI MOHAMMADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Khusi Mohammad, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that …

PRAMOD BAIGAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Pramod Baiga, who was arrested in a case registered under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended that he …

SHIVAM @ PRAVEEN MODANWALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Shivam @ Praveen Modanwal, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release in a case registered under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. He argued that he had been falsely …

PRINCEversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Prince, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 321 of 2025 under sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated based on a solitary base case and that he …

SAURABH @ KARIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the applicant Saurabh @ Kariya who was charged under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant argued that he was …

AMITversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Amit, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. Amit claimed he was falsely implicated and …

RANI KINNARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rani Kinnar, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

JITENDRA @ JEETUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Jitendra @ Jeetu, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2/3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that …

ANOOP YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Anoop Yadav, who was charged under multiple sections of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted that he was …

SHUBHAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shubham, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

AKHAND PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Akhand Pratap Singh, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The …

RAHUL PANDEY ALIAS MAYANK PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rahul Pandey alias Mayank Pandey, who was arrested in Crime No. 805 of 2025 under Sections 2(b)(i), 2(b)(xi) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social …

AMAN YADAV ALIAS ANAM AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 25‑07‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 21‑10‑2024 in a Special Session Trial under the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The High Court examined …