Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3
Mukesh applied for bail in a 1992 case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 IPC. He claimed that his earlier bail in 1994 was terminated because he had to leave the city for livelihood reasons, not because he absconded, and that he has been in custody since March 2024. The State …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajesh Sonkar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 8, 20, 27A, 29 and 60 of the NDPS Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and that the only reference to him was in a co‑accused’s confessional …
The applicant, Rajesh Sonkar, sought bail in a NDPS case (Crime No. 89 of 2025) alleging innocence and that his name appeared only in a co‑accused's confessional statement, which lacks evidentiary value. He argued that he was falsely implicated, that the police had lodged multiple cases against him …
