Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
54 judgments · newest first · showing 1–54
The applicant, Fakaroo, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging false implication. The applicant argued that he is already on bail in the sole …
Prince Singh, accused under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 in a case registered at Chopan police station, was detained since 26‑08‑2026 despite being on bail in a separate solitary case. He contended that the police had falsely …
The applicant, Mohd Asif, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He claimed false implication, noting that the only case shown …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Pratik Pandey under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, fearing arrest in a criminal case (Crime No. 147 of 2026). The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, noting that the …
The applicant, Krishna Kumar, sought bail under Section 483 of the CrPC for a case filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He argued that the FIR was vague, did not satisfy the definition of a "gang" or "gangster", and that he had already …
The applicant, Mohd Hamid @ Saddam, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He argued that the FIR was vague, did not disclose any act falling within the definition of "gang" or "gangster", and that …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, concerning Pradeep @ Deepak Sharma, who was in custody since 21‑04‑2026. The applicant argued that the FIR was vague, did not allege any act fitting the …
Gopal Goswami filed a second bail application under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code for a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He claimed he was falsely implicated and pointed to a history of 26 cases where bail …
The applicant, Shani Kumar Saroj, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He claimed that he was falsely implicated in four base cases from 2024 and that …
The applicant, Barkat Ali, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC and Sections 2(b)(xv) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, fearing arrest in Crime No.113 of 2026. He sought interim protection to appear before the trial …
The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 CrPC in a case filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, fearing arrest. The State opposed, noting the applicant was already on regular bail but had absconded since 2017, leading to …
The applicant, Dharmendra, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case registered under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, fearing arrest. He contended that he had been falsely implicated, noting that the only base case against him already …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Varis under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, noting that …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Afroj under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that she was …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 CrPC in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant, Hari Sharan Tiwari, claimed false implication and pointed out that he was already on bail in the only base case …
The applicant, Rameshchandra, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He claimed he was falsely implicated and that the only case shown against him in the …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Susheel Kumar under Section 482 of the CrPC and the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, where he alleged false implication in a case involving two base cases in a gang chart. The applicant had no prior …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicants, Zeeshan and Gulistana, claimed they were falsely implicated and that …
The applicant, Akash Chauhan, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He asserted that he was falsely implicated, noting that only a single base case appears against him in the gang …
Navi Mohmad, a businessman, challenged the attachment of his movable property (motorcycle, tractor, and a tipper) by the District Magistrate under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He argued that no FIR under Section 3(1) of the Act was ever filed against him, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhay Tiwari under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 in a case registered as Crime No. 40 of 2021. The applicant argued that the FIR was vague, did not allege any act falling within the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sultan Alias Raju, accused under Sections 2B(1)(viii)(xi) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 in Crime No. 39 of 2025. The applicant argued that he was implicated only through a solitary case in a gang …
Petitioner Mohd Afzal challenged the attachment of his property by orders dated 17.02.2026 and 17.06.2023 issued by the District Magistrate under Section 14 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, contending that the property was purchased from his own income and …
Rohit Sharma applied for bail in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 10136 of 2026, seeking release in case No. 49 of 2026 under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. His counsel argued that the FIR was vague, did not fall within the definition of …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shoaib alias Billu, who was arrested under Section 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that the FIR was vague, lacking specific allegations that fit the statutory definition of a …
The applicant, Anas Urf Popa, sought bail in a case filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He argued that the FIR was vague, lacking specific allegations that fit the statutory definitions of "gang" or "gangster," and that similar bail …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vansh Verma, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed false implication based on a single base case in a gang chart and pointed to his …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dalveer Singh, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 399 of 2023 under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated based on a single base …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu alias Nikhil, who was arrested in Crime No. 790 of 2025 under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated based on a single base case in a gang …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohd. Inam under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed false implication and highlighted that he was already on bail in two base cases and had a criminal history of six …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS by Santosh Kumar Gaud, who was implicated in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 for alleged cow slaughter. The applicant argued …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Amil, who was arrested under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant had been in jail since 14 April 2026 but was already on bail in the solitary base case shown in the gang chart …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Wasim, who was in custody since 8 April 2026 for an alleged offence under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that only a single base case was shown in the gang …
The applicant, Majid, filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 02‑08‑2011 issued by the Special Judge (Gangsters Act) in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant contended that he was already on …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sachin Thakur, who was arrested under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, in Crime No. 27 of 2026. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated based on a solitary base case (Crime No. 618 …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Vikas Srivastav, who was charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that he had been falsely implicated and was already on bail in three related cases, …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Devendra Mishra (alias Dabbu) under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, in FIR dated 13-11-2021. The applicant argued that the gang chart linking him to the case had been quashed …
The applicant, Anil, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 592 of 2025) filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He argued that he is neither a gang member nor a leader and that in the two related base cases shown in the gang chart, as …
The applicant, Shubham, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 413 of 2025) under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He argued that although he is named as an accused in the present matter and three other base cases shown in a …
The applicant, Ishrak @ Kale Khan, sought bail in a case filed under Sections 3(1) and 2(b)(xvii) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He argued that he is neither a gang member nor a leader and that the sole case linking him to a gang is isolated, while his other …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bhura under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, relating to a pending criminal case (Crime No.31 of 2026). The applicant argued that the FIR was vague, lacking specific allegations that fit …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anurag Gupta, who was in custody since 2 February 2026 in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that the FIR was vague, did not satisfy the statutory definition of a "gang" or …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pradyuman Singh and Ankit Singh under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicants argued that the FIR was vague, did not specifically allege an act covered by the definition of "gang" or "gangster", and …
The Allahabad High Court considered bail application No. 12189 of 2026 filed by Rahim, who is charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 for alleged disturbance of public order and related offences. The applicant contended that the FIR was …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Farukh Muhammad Shikalgar under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that the FIR was vague, did not disclose any act falling within the definition of …
The Allahabad High Court considered bail application No. 12194 of 2026 filed by Ankur Nagar, who is charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 for alleged disturbance of public order. The applicant contended that the FIR is vague, lacking …
The applicant, Suraj @ Mukhiya, sought bail in a case filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that the FIR was vague and did not disclose a specific gang‑related offence. The applicant argued that he had previously been granted …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Sartaj in a case registered under Section 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant contended that the FIR was vague, did not satisfy the statutory definition of a "gang" or "gangster", …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohd. Ali, who was detained on 13‑03‑2026 in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that the FIR was vague and did not satisfy the definition of a "gang" or "gangster" under Section …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Alok Shukla under Sections 2 and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 in Crime No. 339 of 2024. The applicant argued that the investigation was complete, the charge sheet had been filed, and no …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an application for anticipatory bail under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 filed by Sanjeev Kumar Yadav and Sudhir Singh, who were alleged to be involved in a criminal case (Crime No. 336 of 2023) and were …
The applicant, Vinod Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 13‑01‑2026 and a cognizance/summoning order dated 18‑07‑2026 in a special trial under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. He argued that …
The applicants, Istekar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 31‑07‑2019 and the entire proceeding under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. Their contention was that the gangster case …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mohd Yunus under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed false implication and …
