Created by Fuzzy Cloud

U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act

3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3

KAMAL RATHOREversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Kamal Rathore under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false implication based on a …

ANUGAR KUMAR @ ANURAG DUBEY @ DABBANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Anugar Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking the release of three mobile phones seized by the police in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant argued that the phones were falsely implicated, that retaining them …

SHAEED @ MOHD SHAEED AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amroha, on 18‑Jan‑2021 in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The …