Created by Fuzzy Cloud

U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act

46 judgments · newest first · showing 1–46

SALMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Salman, who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. Salman claimed innocence, asserted that he was …

RAJUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Raju, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false implication, had …

AMIT SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Amit Singh, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act and had been in custody since 7 December …

VISHAL SINGH SISODIYA @ ASHISH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Vishal Singh Sisodiya, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2/3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The …

NAUSHAD ALIAS TOLAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Naushad alias Tola, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

ANKUR TYAGIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ankur Tyagi, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, argued …

AADESH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Aadesh Singh, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed …

MOHAMMAD SHAMSHER @ SHAMSEERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Mohammad Shamsher, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case registered under Sections 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. He claimed innocence, argued that he had been in custody since March 6, 2026, and …

ABHINAV ALIAS MONU CHAURASIAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Abhinav alias Monu Chaurasia, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The …

AKHIL PAL ALIAS ATUL ALIAS SIKANDARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Akhil Pal, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release while facing a charge under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. He claimed false implication, highlighted that he was …

RAMCHANDRA YADAV @ MAIKUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramchandra Yadav under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated and pointed to the bail granted to co‑accused in similar cases. The State did …

IRFANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Irfan, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

ANIL PRAJAPATIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Anil Prajapati, who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant asserted his …

AJEETversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ajeet, who is accused in a case registered under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended that he is …

GANDHI CHUAHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Gandhi Chauhan, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2/3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended …

ANILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Anil, who is charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that he had …

WAKARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Wakar, who is accused in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …

MANGAL YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mangal Yadav, who is charged under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, highlighted that he …

TAUSIF KHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Tausif Khan, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release while facing trial under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had been in …

RIYAJUDDINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the applicant Riyajuddin who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted …

AKASH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Akash Yadav, who was arrested under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act in Crime No. 77 of 2026. The applicant claimed false implication and pointed to the bail granted to similarly …

SOHAN PRASAD RAVANIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sohan Prasad Ravani, who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false …

PARVEJ AALAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the petitioner Parvej Aalam who was arrested in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act (GAAPA). The petitioner claimed innocence, argued that …

RAMA ALIAS RAHULversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Rama alias Rahul, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …

SHAVEJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shavej, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …

MOHAMMAD HANIFversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mohammad Hanif, who is charged under Sections 2(b)(i), 2(b)(xvii) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

DHARMENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Dharmendra, who is charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that he was already …

MOTILALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Motilal, who is charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that he was …

DEEPAK HARIJANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Deepak Harijan, who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended that he was …

ARJUN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Arjun Singh, who was arrested in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, had been in …

ABID ALIAS GABBARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the applicant Abid alias Gabbar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false …

SHOAIB @ CHAOBAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shoaib @ Chaoba, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended …

AASIFversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Aasif, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …

SOHANVIRversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for the accused Sohanvir, who was also charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false implication, …

SANJEEV PATHAK ALIAS SUDHIR SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for Sanjeev Pathak, who is accused under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false implication, long pre‑trial …

INDRAPAL URF NIDHAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Indrapal Urf Nidha, who was arrested in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, had …

JAKIR HUSSAINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Jakir Hussain, who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false …

ABDUL RAHIMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Abdul Rahim, who is accused under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, had been in custody …

AJAJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ajaj, who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, …

AKHILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Akhil, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. Akhil claimed he was falsely implicated and …

KAMAL SINGH SON OF TULARAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Kamal Singh, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely …

DANISHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Danish, who is charged under Sections 2 and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted …

MEHARBAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for two accused in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicants contended that they were falsely …

NAVRATAN RAJBHARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Navratan Rajbhar, who is charged under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that he was …

GAURAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Gaurav, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. He claimed innocence, highlighted that he was already on …

MAYANK @ SACHIN BHARDWAJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Mayank @ Sachin Bhardwaj, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release while trial proceeds for an offence under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed …