Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921

11 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

C/M. ST. JOHN INTER COLLEGEversusGIRDHARI SINGH AND ORS.

2001 INSC 18930 March 2001Case Allowed

C/M. St. John Inter College, a minority educational institution under Article 30, terminated the services of its employees without obtaining prior approval of the Inspector as required by Section 16G(3)(a) of the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 and Regulation 44. The Allahabad High Court set aside the termination

A.A CALTONversusTHE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ANOTHER

1983 INSC 2625 March 1983Dismissed

The appellant challenged the appointment of A.P. Joseph as principal of a minority college, arguing that an amendment to the U.P. Intermediate Education Act (U.P. Act 26 of 1975) had removed the Director of Education’s power to appoint principals of minority institutions, and that the earlier disapproval of the selecti

AKHILESH KUMAR SINGHversusRAM DAWAN & ORS.

2015 INSC 102423 September 2015Dismissed

The case concerned a single clerk post in a U.P. Intermediate College governed by the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921. The college's regulations required that 50% of sanctioned posts be filled by promotion, with a note that a single post would be deemed as one when calculating the 50% quota. The petitioner argued

JAI PRAKASH SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.

1997 INSC 30120 March 1997Dismissed

J.P. Sharma, who had been Headmaster of a Junior High School since July 1974, contested the appointment of Man Singh Verma as Headmaster of the same school after it was upgraded to a High School in July 1976. The selection was made under Section 16‑E(2) of the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921, which requires a min

SMT. RAM SAKHI DEVI ETC.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. ETC.

1997 INSC 30220 March 1997Dismissed

The appellant, Ram Sakhi Devi, was appointed headmistress of a junior high school that was upgraded to a high school. The managing committee selected her under the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921, but the District Inspector did not ratify the appointment. The appellant challenged the dismissal of her writ petitio

RAKESH KUMAR SINGHversusTHE COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT, RAIBARALI

1996 INSC 41620 March 1996Dismissed

The appellant, a lecturer appointed on probation, was terminated after a performance report and a management resolution, with prior approval from the District Inspector under the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921. The Deputy Director held the termination invalid because Regulation 25, framed under Section 16‑C, req

BALBIR KAUR & ANR.versusU.P. SECONDARY EDUCATION SERVICES SELECTION BOARD, ALLAHABAD & ORS.

2008 INSC 69116 May 2008Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the selection of principals for intermediate colleges under the U.P. Secondary Education Selection Board Act, 1982 and the 1998 Rules. The petitioners challenged the advertisements on six grounds, including the validity of counting lecturer or head‑master experience as qualifying experience,

DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION (SECONDARY) AND ANR.versusPUSHPENDRA KUMAR AND OTHERS

1998 INSC 23413 May 1998Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned dependents of teaching and non‑teaching staff of non‑government aided schools in Uttar Pradesh who, after the death of the employee, applied for compassionate appointment under the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921. The District Inspector appointed them to Class IV posts, but the applicants filed

RAM ASHRAY SINGH AND ANR.versusRAM BUX SINGH AND ORS.

2003 INSC 7511 February 2003Appeal(s) allowed

The employee, a Lab Assistant employed since 1973, was terminated in 1978 after disciplinary proceedings. He later filed a representation under Regulation 21 of the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921, which was dismissed, and a writ petition in the High Court that ordered a lump‑sum compensation of Rs 30,000, noting

OM PRAKASH RANA ETC. ETC.versusSWARUP SINGH TOMAR & ORS. ETC. ETC.

1986 INSC 1189 May 1986Dismissed

The case concerned a vacancy for the post of Principal of Veer Smarak Intermediate College. Om Prakash Rana, a principal of another college, sought to fill the vacancy by transfer under section 16‑G(2)(c) of the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921, which allowed transfer of service. After the U.P. Secondary Education

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusCOMMITIEE OF MANAGEMENT OF S.K.M. INTER COLLEGE AND ANR.

1995 INSC 2526 April 1995Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh, through the Director of Education, issued a show‑cause notice to the Committee of Management of S.K.M. Inter College under Section 16‑D(2) and (3) of the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921, alleging mismanagement, misappropriation of funds and other irregularities. The Committee's explana

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search