Created by Fuzzy Cloud

U.P. Marriage Registration Rules, 2017

5 judgments · newest first · showing 1–5

SMT SONI ARORA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a married adult couple, sought a writ of mandamus to prevent any interference in their marital life and to obtain police protection against alleged threats from respondents. They asserted that their marriage on 16‑02‑2026 was consensual, without any FIR, and that they were being …

SMT SONALI YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, a married adult couple, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful marital life and to provide protection against alleged harassment. They claimed their marriage on 28‑02‑2026 was consensual, with no FIR filed, and alleged …

SMT. KHUSHBU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Khushbu and another, married on 29 November 2025 and alleged that the State of Uttar Pradesh and two other respondents were threatening and harassing them for having married. They sought a writ of mandamus to prevent any interference in their marital life and to obtain police …

SMT. MUSKAN SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Muskan Singh and another, married on 16-02-2026 and alleged harassment by the State of Uttar Pradesh authorities for exercising their right to marry. They sought a writ of mandamus to prevent any interference in their marital life and requested police protection. Relying on Supreme …

SMT. JANKI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, a 20‑year‑old woman and a 19‑year‑old man, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their marital life and to provide protection, alleging harassment by the woman's father. The State argued that the marriage was void or voidable under the …