Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
26 judgments · newest first · showing 1–26
Mukesh Kumar filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus and prohibition to stop the Commissioner, Aligarh from proceeding with a land exchange alleged to be fraudulent and not in compliance with statutory procedures. The petitioner claimed that the exchange of a public utility …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Board of Revenue (Respondent No.1) to decide Revision No.350 of 2023, which had been pending since 2023. They argued that the revision was being adjourned without justification, contrary to Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, …
Petitioner Sita Ram filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Additional District Magistrate (Finance & Revenue, Azamgarh) to decide the pending revenue case No. 3642 of 2024 within the time frame prescribed under Section 38(2) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The State and the Gaon Sabha …
Petitioners Rama Shankar and two others filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Board of Revenue to decide Revision No.4316 of 2025 (Jata Shankar et al. vs. Rama Shankar et al.) which had been pending since 2025. They argued that the Board’s failure to hear the revision violated Rule 183(4) …
The petitioner, Govind, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondent (a revenue authority) to decide Revision No. 136 of 2025 (Narayan v. Govind) under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner alleged that the revision, pending since 2025, had been repeatedly …
Ramsagar filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the second respondent to decide Revision No.253 of 2024, which has been pending since 2024. The petitioner argued that the revision, filed before the Board of Revenue/Commissioner, is being unduly adjourned without justification, contrary to Rule …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to the State respondent to decide Revision No. 16 of 2025 within a specific time. The petitioner alleged that the revision had been pending for over a year, contrary to Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, which mandates a …
Petitioners Kalyan Singh and others filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh (respondent No.1) to decide a stay application filed along with Revision No. 6235 of 2025, which had been pending since December 2025. The petitioners argued that despite …
Petitioner Chhedi Lal filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the respondent to decide Revision No. 5321 of 2024 (Mohd. Saeed v. Chhedi Lal) filed under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the revision had been pending since 2024 and was being adjourned …
Petitioner Chandrika Yadav filed a public interest litigation seeking removal of illegal obstructions recorded as Nali Tubewell on several plots in Azamgarh. The High Court earlier directed the petitioner to file applications under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which resulted in Cases …
Santosh filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, to decide Revision No. REV/540/2019, which has been pending since 2019. The petitioner argued that under Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, the revision should be decided within six months, but …
The petitioner, Lal Mani, filed a writ petition challenging a notification dated 24 June 2026 ordering the re‑auction of Pond No. 589 in Village Bheski, Prayagraj. He claimed that a fishery lease had been granted to him for ten years starting 28 July 2022, and that he was ready to pay the balance …
The petitioners, Amarnath and five others, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (respondent No.2) to decide a revenue case (Computerized Case No. T202616660108772/2026) concerning 1.9050 hectares of land in Musahi village. The petition alleged that the …
Petitioner Rajneesh Ranjan filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate (SDM) of Koraon, Prayagraj, to decide a pending partition suit under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within a short, fixed period. The petitioner relied on Sub‑Rule (10) of Rule …
Petitioner Raju filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others to cancel a fisheries lease on public utility land (Pokhari) of Araji No.780 (0.5260 hectare) and to restrain any interference by respondents. The respondents, through standing counsel, raised a …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the approval order dated 21-06-2023 that granted a fisheries lease to the respondents. The standing counsel for the State raised a preliminary objection that under Rule 59 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, an appeal against the order lies before …
Petitioner Kamlesh Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Board of Revenue, U.P., to decide Revision No. 2989 of 2025 under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that notices were issued before the revision was admitted, the lower court records have …
Petitioner Lal Babu Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (respondent No. 2) to decide case No. 7072/2024 filed under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 2024. The petitioner argued that the proceeding should be …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, seeking a court direction to compel the revenue court (respondent No.2) to expedite Revision No. 582 of 2026. The petition was filed on 16 April 2026, before the notice dated 21 April 2026 had even been served on …
The petitioner, Om Prakash, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to the second respondent, a revenue authority, to decide Revision No.141 of 2025 filed under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that he was the sole contesting party and that the lower court …
The petitioner, Chhotak @ Chhotkan Vishambhar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Barhaj, Deoria, to decide a suit filed under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 2025. The petitioner argued that …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.2, the Sub‑Divisional Officer, to decide a land dispute case (No.3540 of 2017) pending under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. They argued that the proceedings had been pending since 2017 and that the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Tehsildar of Hata Tehsil, Kushinagar, to expeditiously decide a pending mutation application (Case No. 1099 of 2024). The petitioner argued that under sub‑rule (7) of Rule 34 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code Rules, 2016, the Tehsildar …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial) to decide Appeal No.1134 of 2025 expeditiously under Section 59 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016. The court noted that while notices were issued to the opposite party on 17-04-2025, the …
Apurva Singh filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Tehsildar, Judicial, Ballia Sadar, to decide a pending mutation case (No.11136 of 2025) that had been filed under sub‑rule (7) of Rules 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016. The petitioner argued that the Tahsildar had failed to …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Tehsildar of Padrauna to decide a pending mutation application (Case No.3077 of 2022) expeditiously. The petitioner argued that under sub‑rule (7) of Rule 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, the Tehsildar must dispose of undisputed …
