Created by Fuzzy Cloud

U.P. Revenue Code

9 judgments · newest first · showing 1–9

UDAY BHAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Uday Bhan and two others, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Officer (SDO) of Tehsil Kaptanganj to register their restoration application under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC and Section 151 CPC, which sought recall of an order dated 25‑06‑2026 in the …

RAHUL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rahul Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Tehsildar (Judicial) of Bhatparrani Tehsil, Deoria, to decide a pending mutation case (Case No. 2628 of 2025) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioner argued that the case had been pending …

MUKTI DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ of certiorari and mandamus to quash a notice dated 02‑07‑2026 issued under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code that threatened dispossession and demolition of their house on plot No. 1286. They relied on a settlement order dated 07‑01‑2004 confirming their title to the …

SHASHANKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Shashank filed a public interest litigation alleging that private individuals had encroached upon Gaon Sabha land in Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner sought the High Court's intervention to stop the encroachment. The Court examined whether it could entertain the petition or whether the petitioner had …

BHOLA NATH PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Bhola Nath Pal filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Naib Tehsildar of Mirzapur to decide a pending mutation application (Case No. 14495/2025) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which had been pending since 27 August 2025. The petitioner alleged that the …

GEETA DEVI GRAM PRADHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Geeta Devi, a Gram Pradhan, filed a writ petition seeking permission to file a fresh petition with better particulars under Section 72(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code. The petitioner argued that the original petition lacked sufficient details and that the court should allow a …

TANVEER AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 16 OTHERS

The appellant Tanveer Ahmad challenged a Single Judge’s order dismissing his writ petition that sought mandamus to compel a district magistrate to set up an enquiry into alleged manipulation of revenue records and to preserve various documents, among other reliefs. The High Court examined whether …

MULCHANDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mulchandra, filed a writ petition under Section 144 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, seeking a mandamus directing the Sub Divisional Magistrate of Mandal Chitrakootdham to expedite the disposal of case No. RST/7867/2025, which had been pending since 2025. The petitioner …

SMT. PRITI SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt. Priti Shukla filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Nayab Tehsildar of Prayagraj to decide a pending revenue case (Case No.3120 of 2026) under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code. The petitioner argued that despite several dates being fixed, the case remained …