Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

U.P. Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953

5 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

WEST U.P. SUGAR MILLS ASSOCIATION & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.

2020 INSC 34622 April 2020Reference answered

The Supreme Court examined a reference concerning whether the Uttar Pradesh government could fix a State Advised Price (SAP) for sugarcane under Section 16 of the U.P. Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953 and whether such power conflicted with the Central government's authority to fix a minimum price

UNION OF INDIAversusLAKSHMI SUGAR & OIL MILLS LTD., HARDOI

1985 INSC 24221 November 1985Appeal(s) allowed

The Central Government, invoking the Sugar Undertakings (Taking over of Management) Ordinance, 1978, issued a notice to Lakshmi Sugar & Oil Mills Ltd. alleging arrears of cane dues exceeding ten per cent of the total price of cane purchased in the immediately preceding sugar year, and subsequently took over the managem

GANGA SUGAR CO. LTD., ETC.versusSTATE OF U.P. & OTHERS ETC.

1979 INSC 19120 September 1979Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the validity of the Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane Purchase Tax Act, 1961, which imposed a tax of Rs.1.25 paise per quintal on sugarcane purchased by factories and 50 paise per quintal on khandsari units. The petitioners argued that the Act was ultra‑vires because sugarcane is a raw material for a "

SUGAR MILLS ASSOCIATION & ORS .versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.

2012 INSC 3317 January 2012Matter referred to larger bench

The Supreme Court examined a series of civil appeals concerning the payment of outstanding principal amounts to sugarcane growers by sugar factories in Uttar Pradesh. The crux of the dispute was whether the State Government could fix a State Advised Price (SAP) for sugarcane that exceeds the minimum price fixed by the

U.P. COOPERATIVE CANE UNION FEDERATIONversusWEST U.P. SUGAR MILL ASSOCIATION AND ORS.

2004 INSC 3325 May 2004Disposed off

The case concerned whether the Uttar Pradesh Government could fix a "State Advised Price" (SAP) for sugarcane that was higher than the minimum price fixed by the Central Government under the Essential Commodities Act and the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966. The petitioners (U.P. Co‑operative Cane Union Federation and s

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search