Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
52 judgments · newest first · showing 1–52
The case concerned a dispute over the mutation of land belonging to the estate of the late Dharampal Singh. In a partition suit under Section 176 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, the court had determined Dharampal Singh’s share to be one‑fourth of 9.854 hectares. A …
The petitioner, a co‑tenure holder of a jointly purchased plot, challenged a final decree of partition dated 17‑06‑2014 and subsequent appellate orders, alleging that the suit was never filed by him and that his signatures on the plaint, vakalatnama, compromise and qurras were forged. He filed a …
The petition challenged the Board of Revenue's order quashing earlier revenue orders concerning Plot No.387, on the ground that the Additional Commissioner had no authority to refer the matter to the Board under Section 218 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 after that provision was omitted by the …
The petitioner, Ramvriksha Nishad, filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction to respondent No.3 to decide a representation dated 20 August 2025, aiming to remove an alleged illegal encroachment by private respondent No.6 on a 0.016 hectare plot recorded as Banjar in Jaunpur …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate of Sagdi, Azamgarh, to decide a recall application filed on 19‑07‑2002 in a land‑reform case under Section 229‑B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. The petition argued that the …
The petitioners claimed rights over plot 545/2 based on possession and filed an objection under Section 122‑B(4‑F) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. Their objection was rejected in 1997, but an appeal before the Settlement Officer Consolidation was allowed in July 1999. …
The petitioner filed a public interest litigation seeking a court direction for the removal of illegal encroachments on plots 245 and 246 in Village Hinauta, Kaushambi. The encroachers had previously been ordered to vacate under Section 122B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, …
Data Prasad Dubey filed a public interest litigation seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the revenue officials to enforce a 2002 eviction order under Section 122‑B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act and to remove an illegal encroachment on a village plot. The petitioner claimed …
The petitioner, Ram Adhar Chauhan, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Additional Commissioner (Administration‑III), Gorakhpur, to decide a pending land reform case (No. 572 of 2024) under Section 331(3) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. The petitioner …
The appellant, A.P. Electrical Equipment Corporation, owned a large parcel of land in Hyderabad that was declared excess under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The State issued a notice under section 10(5) on 5 January 2008, affixed it on 8 January, and after alleged non‑compliance …
The dispute concerned the shares of Muslim parties in agricultural holdings (Khata Nos. 98, 99 and 100) in Sultanpur, Uttar Pradesh. The appellants, heirs of Zahoor Ahmed, claimed a half‑share in the lands, while the respondents, heirs of Sami Ullah, asserted that the appellants were entitled only …
The dispute concerned ownership of ancestral land in Mustafabad village, originally belonging to Angat and inherited by his sons, including Kalyan Singh, who was a co‑owner before consolidation proceedings began. Ram Jai Lal, an uncle, sought to have Kalyan Singh’s name removed from the revenue …
The Supreme Court examined whether 162 acres of land in Kasmandi Khurd, Uttar Pradesh, vested in the State under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 and was subsequently declared a reserved forest under the Indian Forest Act, 1927. It held that the Gaon Sabha had no authority to …
The respondents Akhlaq Hussain and Saqir Hussain exchanged a small parcel of land for a larger agricultural parcel owned by Mangal Singh, a member of a Scheduled Tribe, through a registered deed. The Assistant Collector declared the exchange void under Sections 157‑B and 161 of the U.P. Zamindari …
The plaintiff, a private limited company, purchased a parcel of agricultural land in 1998 and later discovered that the seller had fraudulently executed four sale deeds in 2006 in favour of other parties. The plaintiff filed a suit in the civil court seeking cancellation of the 2006 deed and an …
The dispute concerned a plot of land used as 'Abadi' that had been declared 'Chakout', i.e., outside the Uttar Pradesh consolidation scheme. Four brothers were co‑tenure holders; one brother sold his one‑fourth share to the respondents. The remaining brothers sued for injunction, arguing that under …
The State of Uttarakhand challenged the Assistant Collector's notice under Sections 166 and 167 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, which declared 1.626 hectares of land transferred to the Guru Ram Das Educational Trust Society as excess and vested in the State. The High …
The appeal concerned a sale deed executed by a tenant, Raghoram, who had deposited twenty times the land revenue to convert his sirdari rights into Bhumidhari rights under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. The sale deed was executed on the same day as the deposit, but Raghoram …
Kamla Prasad filed a suit in a civil court seeking cancellation of sale deeds alleging they were executed under intoxication and that he was not the sole owner of the land, which was co‑shared with other parties whose names were not entered in the revenue records. The trial court held it had …
The Bareilly Development Authority (BDA) ran a self‑financing housing scheme in which the brochure stated only an estimated cost of flats, with final costing to be determined later. After construction was altered from four storeys to two, the BDA raised the price of the flats based on actual …
The Supreme Court examined the land‑holding of Escorts Farms Ltd., which occupied land released by the Uttar Pradesh government to the former ruler of Kashipur under a Government Grant and later became subject to the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act. The State initiated …
Manorey, an agricultural labourer belonging to a Scheduled Caste, had cultivated a 2.45‑acre plot for 14‑15 years that was vested in the Gaon Sabha and later leased to others. He filed an application under Section 122B(4F) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 seeking protection …
Jamuna Prasad executed a Will in 1956 bequeathing his entire movable and immovable property, including Bhumadhari land, to his second wife Sona Devi with a right of alienation, and thereafter to the nine sons of his daughters from both wives. After the deaths of Jamuna Prasad (1961) and Sona Devi …
Wali Mohammed, a Muslim landowner, executed a Will bequeathing 25.32 acres to the appellants and died leaving a son, Gulam Mohammed, and a daughter, Moti Begum. The Tehsildar, after public notice and examination of witnesses, held the Will genuine and ordered mutation of the bequeathed land in the …
The dispute concerned the allotment of 15 biswas of a pond (Talab) in village Ugapur to ten members of a Scheduled Caste family for house sites under the UP Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. Objections were raised, the Additional Collector cancelled the allotment, and the Commissioner …
The original owner, Smt. Vidyawati Devi, sold land to the appellants on 12 July 1984, and their names were entered as tenure holders in the revenue records. Respondents 3 and 4 forged a sale deed dated 24 July 1984, impersonating the vendor, and attempted to dispossess the appellants. The appellants …
The case concerned a set of thirteen plots in Gorakhpur district where the appellants, Kali Prasad and others, were recorded as occupants (asamis) after the death of the last Khatedar, Smt. Partapi, in 1952. The father of respondents 3 and 4 filed civil suits for declaration of bhumidari rights and …
Deo Nandan and another purchased land from Bechan, a sirdar, on the same day Bechan filed an application under Section 134 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 and deposited the required revenue. Bechan died before a bhumidari certificate was issued; his widow later sold the …
The dispute concerned three plots (Nos. 1366‑1368) in Maliyana village, Meerut, which were used as land appurtenant to the staff quarters of Jaswant Sugar Mill (later V.P. State Sugar Corporation). Dewa Ram, the predecessor‑in‑interest of the respondents, claimed sirdari rights based on a lease …
The appellant's wife, Smt. Kaushalya Devi, inherited a two-fifths share in two khatas from her father in 1944 and became a co‑bhumidar under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. She died in 1953, before the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 came into force. The appellant claimed the …
The appellants claimed ownership of several plots recorded in the name of their predecessor, Hira Lal, while the respondents asserted that the land was "sir" and "khudkasht" of their predecessor, Hansraj, who had mortgaged the plots to Hira Lal in 1920. After the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition …
The appellants, claiming to be original residents of villages on the Bihar‑Uttar Pradesh border, challenged the validity of the Bihar and Uttar Pradesh (Alteration of Boundaries) Act, 1968, arguing that state boundaries were frozen as of 26‑January‑1950 and that the disputed lands were never …
Muneshwar (deceased) filed a partition suit under Section 176 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition Act, which was decreed but never executed, leaving him in possession of the land. The respondents later filed a suit for possession under Section 209, more than six years after the date prescribed in …
Shanti Devi mortgaged her agricultural land and, upon default, the land was sold at a revenue auction. The purchaser submitted an affidavit that his total holding would remain below the 12.50‑acre ceiling prescribed by Section 154(1) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, but …
The appellants and respondents were holding haats (market places) on land in Uttar Pradesh. The dispute centered on whether the Settlement Officer under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1954 could adjudicate a case involving buildings on that land used for commercial purposes. Section 3(5) of …
Bechan, a bhumidar under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, executed three gift deeds in favour of his stepson Laldhar—two in June 1951 and one on 18 November 1957. The first two gifts were challenged on the ground that permission for alienation was not properly obtained, but …
Jallo purchased the proprietary right of a Zamindari estate in 1933 and became the khudkhash-holder. She later inducted her husband Tunda as a tenant, who died in 1947‑48. After the enactment of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, a dispute arose over who succeeded to the estate …
The appellants, former zamindars, challenged the vesting of their estates in the State of Uttar Pradesh under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, which they claimed left their rights to work mines intact. The Collector issued notices to stop mining and offered leases governed by …
The appellant, Prem Ballabh Belwal, was a tenure‑holder of 182 acres of bhumiswami land under the U.P. Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960. His wife, Basanti Devi, held 24 acres as an Asami (occupancy) right. The question before the Supreme Court was whether the wife's land, held only …
Seth Banarasi Dass, the lessee of a sugar mill, was subject to a recovery certificate for government dues. Shares he owned were attached and put up for public auction, but he raised objections that the shares were pledged to banks and that the amount claimed was incorrect. The auction proceeded, the …
Kishori claimed ownership of two plots in Varanasi and filed objections under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953. He had earlier instituted a civil suit on 5 January 1954 for injunction and possession against Faqir in the Munsif Court; the trial court dismissed it, but the appellate court …
The appellant, Kanwar Lal, succeeded to a 1920 lease of 4,805 acres granted under the Government Grants Act, 1895, which was later taken over by the Uttar Pradesh Government Estates Thekedari Abolition Act, 1958. The State amended the Grants Act and later enacted the Validation Act, 1970 to revive …
Shyam Singh obtained a Rs 34,000 loan from the State Bank of India for a tractor, mortgaging 22 acres of land. After defaulting, the bank invoked Section 10‑B of the U.P. Agricultural Credit Act, 1973 and the Tehsildar attached the tractor, whose estimated value exceeded the debt. Later, under …
The appellants appealed against a civil suit for possession of a plot in Varanasi, contending that the land was agricultural and thus fell within the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. The respondents argued that the land was "abadi" (non‑agricultural) and that the civil court …
The plaintiff, Fateh Bahadur Singh, sued Jang Bahadur (the second respondent) and two non‑tenure‑holders, Kalawati and Mithlesh Kumari, for specific performance of a sale agreement for a plot of land. The lower courts held that the plaintiff was entitled to specific performance, treating the sales …
Badlu, the father of Hakim Ali, filed a suit under Section 229‑B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 seeking a declaration of bhumidari rights. The suit was dismissed, but the Additional Commissioner reversed the decision, leading the respondent to file a second appeal before …
The plaintiff, Hira Lal, claimed that his father was a sub‑tenant recorded in Khasra 1356 Fasli and had acquired adhivasi and sirdari rights under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, which extinguished the defendants' title. The trial court and the first appellate court rejected …
Wali Mohammad, after redeeming a usufructuary mortgage, possessed two plots from 1946 onward. In 1953 Ram Kumar claimed possession under Section 232 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, asserting that his name was entered as occupant in the Khasra/Khatauni of Fasli year 1356, …
The Punjab Government advanced a loan to a cooperative house‑building society for low‑income housing, securing repayment by mortgaging the sites and houses. The society defaulted on repayments and the government issued a notice invoking clause (b) of section 67 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act to …
The appellants, Zafar Khan and others, claimed possession of land based on a decree under the U.P. Tenancy Act and later asserted they were bhumidars under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. The respondents, having become adhivasis under the same Act, regained possession …
The plaintiffs, who were Thekedars, claimed that the Theka granted to them was for personal cultivation, which under Section 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 made them hereditary tenants entitled to retain possession. The defendants, lessees of the Zamindars, …
The Director of Industries, U.P. advanced a loan of Rs.15,000 to Deep Chand Aggarwal for setting up a cottage industry, secured by a mortgage on his house. When Aggarwal defaulted, the State used Section 3 of the Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1965, read with the Zamindari Abolition and Land …
