Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3
The petitioners filed a public interest writ seeking a mandamus directing the revenue officer (respondent No.3) to decide a recall/restoration application filed on 18‑02‑2025 concerning the mutation of a Gram Sabha name in revenue records for land in Village Ahilyaganj Khadar, Mathura. They alleged …
The applicant's father obtained a partition decree under Section 176 (now Section 116) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, with a final decree dated 28‑05‑2014. Instead of executing the decree, the applicant filed a writ petition in 2024 seeking removal of alleged illegal encroachments on government …
The petitioner, Dharam Raj, filed a writ petition seeking to quash a 7 November 2001 ex‑parte order of the Collector, Azamgarh, and a 31 May 2016 order of the Board of Revenue, both of which removed his and other villagers’ names from land records under Sections 33, 39 and 225 of the Land Revenue …
