Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
99 judgments · newest first · showing 1–99
The petitioners, original owners of several parcels of land, had filed returns under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and the lands were declared surplus with a notice under Section 10(5) for surrender. The notice was challenged and stayed in 1985, leading the High Court to order …
The petitioner, Rose Villa Co‑operative Housing Society Ltd, sought a certificate of unilateral deemed conveyance of the land and building under Section 11(3) of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act (MOFA). The developer, Can Enterprises Pvt Ltd, was under a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process …
The applicant, Amit Tyagi, filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents, including the Tehsildar and the NOIDA Authority, had violated the status‑quo order dated 15 Oct 2025 issued in Writ C No. 33691 of 2025, which restrained any further development or alienation of certain land in …
The applicants, who were original defendants in a suit filed by Kakad Co‑operative Housing Society Ltd., sought a civil revision under Section 115 of the CPC to set aside the City Civil Court’s order rejecting their Order VII‑Rule 11 application that the suit should be dismissed as barred. The suit …
The applicants, who were original defendants in a suit filed by Kakad Co‑operative Housing Society Ltd., sought a civil revision under Section 115 of the CPC to set aside the City Civil Court’s order rejecting their Order VII‑Rule 11 application that the suit should be dismissed as barred. The suit …
The Bombay High Court examined three writ petitions challenging the manner in which the Competent Authority had granted deemed conveyance of land to four cooperative housing societies in a multi‑building layout where the developer had used varying amounts of base FSI and transferred TDR. The …
The petitioners, Uma Devi and two others, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Urban Ceiling authority that rejected their representation to have land entries restored in their names. They alleged that notices required under Sections 10(5) and 10(6) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and …
The petitioner, Ram Lakhan, filed a writ petition seeking correction of revenue records and a restraining order against the State of Uttar Pradesh concerning a 13,427.58 sq.m. parcel of land originally held by his predecessor Jagannath. The land was declared excess vacant under the Urban Land …
The petitioners sought a writ directing the State and other respondents to halt proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, to record the disputed 7,636.21 sq m land in their name, and to prevent interference with their possession. The land originally belonged to Moti Lal …
Petitioner Pyare Lal filed a writ petition seeking restoration of his name in the revenue records for a 12,901.65 sq m land in Madauka village, alleging that notices under Sections 8(3) and 10(5) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 were never served and that possession of the land …
The petitioners, heirs of Bhagwan Das, sought to have a parcel of land recorded in their names under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, after the original owner’s death in 1978. They contended that the ex‑parte proceedings and notices issued under Sections 8, 9 and 10 of the Act were …
The petitioners, claiming two‑thirds share in several plots, sought to have proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 quashed and the revenue entries restored, invoking Section 3 of the Repeal Act, 1999. The land had been declared surplus, vested in the State, and …
The petitioner, Dilshad Hussain, challenged a 2009 order by the Saharanpur Collector that declared the land in dispute as belonging to the Saharanpur Development Authority, seeking to have the revenue entries corrected and his possession recognized. The land had been subject to proceedings under the …
The petitioners, heirs of the original landholder Sukh Dev, filed a writ petition seeking the removal of State entries in the revenue records and restoration of title to their names for three plots of land in Umarpur Neva. The land had been declared excess vacant land under the Urban Land (Ceiling …
The petitioner, Vinay Kumar Nishad, sought a writ directing the State and related authorities to abate the proceedings of a 1976 ceiling case concerning a 1,403.22 sq. m. plot in Prayagraj and to correct revenue records in his favour. The original ceiling return was filed by his parents, and while a …
The petitioners, owners of 6,900 sq m of land in Bhayander, claimed that the State and MTNL had possessed the land since 1989 without paying compensation or completing acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. Parallel …
The petitioners, owners of 6,900 sq m of land in Bhayander, claimed that the State and MTNL had possessed the land since 1989 without paying compensation or completing acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. Parallel …
The petitioners, Mansarovar Co‑op. Housing Society Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash a communication dated 25‑11‑2025 and to compel the issuance of an Occupation Certificate for a building of 3,878 sq.m. The State of Maharashtra contended that the society had …
The petitioners, comprising leaseholders and owners of land and structures occupied by a flyover and road project in Mumbai, challenged the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai's (MCGM) calculation of compensation under Sections 298‑301 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act (MMC Act). They …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus directing the State to delete its name from the revenue record for Plot No. 161 (2.90 acres) and to record the petitioners' name. The respondents argued that the entry had already been rectified and that the petitioners must follow the procedure laid down in …
Acme Housing India Pvt. Ltd. and its director sought a declaration that the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 no longer applied to their 54,500 sq m of land in Thane, the deletion of a mutation entry (No. 1125) that recorded an exemption under Section 20 of that Act, and the quashing of …
The appellants were sub‑plot owners of a 9,303 sq m parcel in Surat that had been declared excess land under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (ULC Act). The State issued a notice under s.10(5) of the ULC Act only to the original landowner, not to the appellants who were in actual …
The dispute concerned 53 acres of land in Survey No.83/2, claimed by the original owners (appellants) and by M/s Visweswara Infrastructure Pvt Ltd. (respondents) who relied on sale agreements dated 19 March 1982 that were never registered. The appellants argued that the unregistered agreements could …
The appellant, A.P. Electrical Equipment Corporation, owned a large parcel of land in Hyderabad that was declared excess under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The State issued a notice under section 10(5) on 5 January 2008, affixed it on 8 January, and after alleged non‑compliance …
M/s Tomorrowland Limited, the highest bidder for a 5‑star hotel site, paid the first instalment but argued that HUDCO (Housing and Urban Development Corporation) was obliged to obtain statutory approvals and execute a sub‑lease before demanding further payments. HUDCO failed to secure the necessary …
The original landholder owned 7,499.20 sq m in Saharanpur, of which 5,499.20 sq m was declared surplus under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 in 1977 and vested in the State through notifications in 1978‑79. The State claimed it had taken actual possession of the surplus land in …
The Supreme Court examined the meaning of “vacant land” under Section 2(q) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, focusing on sub‑clause (i) and the conflict between the earlier Johnson two‑judge decision and the later Billimoria three‑judge decision. The appellants argued that land …
The plaintiff paid an advance for a property sale that was conditioned on the seller obtaining permission under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 within 75 days, with a right to a refund if the permission was not obtained within 90 days. The seller failed to obtain the permission and …
The case concerned a lease of 540 acres of land granted by the Sri Udasin Mutt, a charitable religious institution, to Gulf Oil Corporation Ltd. The State of Telangana sought eviction on the ground that the land is agricultural and, under Section 82 of the Telangana Charitable and Hindu Religious …
The State of Orissa appealed a Division Bench of the Orissa High Court judgment that had set aside orders declaring 0.865-7 acres of land as excess vacant land under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, on the ground that the Act had been repealed and compensation had not been paid. …
The State of Madhya Pradesh took possession of 16,000.32 square metres of land in Bhopal that had been declared surplus under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, and allotted it to the Bhopal Development Authority for housing the poor. The heir of the original owner filed a civil suit …
The first respondent claimed to be the transferable owner of a parcel of land and sued to declare the Moradabad Development Authority's (MDA) auction of that land illegal and to restrain dispossession. The trial court dismissed the suit, holding MDA was the lawful owner; the High Court reversed, …
The case concerned a joint family property in Ullal village that was declared excess land under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The appellant claimed to have purchased a portion of the land in 1994 from a family member and sought restoration of his name in the land records under …
The appellant, Shridhar C. Shetty (deceased) thr. LRs., had obtained an exemption under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 for two plots, obligating him to surrender 20% of the constructed area as tenements to government nominees. He constructed only one plot, handed over seven …
The appellants, legal representatives of the original landowner, challenged the State's forcible possession of surplus land under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, which was effected by a Possession Panchnama on 20 March 1986. After a series of applications, exemptions, and a …
The Government of Andhra Pradesh and others challenged the allotment of a parcel of land (Survey No. 129/45/D) to Andhra Prabha Publications under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. A Single Judge ordered a survey to determine the true identity of the land; the High Court set aside …
Madhusudan Bhanuprasad Pandya, who operated a cement pipe manufacturing business on leasehold land in Ahmedabad, applied for exemption under Section 20 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The State Government rejected the application, and the High Court dismissed his writ petition, …
The suit concerned a parcel of urban land that had been subjected to ceiling proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and subsequently vested in the State, which later leased it to Apollo Gleneagles Hospitals for 30 years. The plaintiffs (Respondent Nos. 1‑7) filed a civil …
The original appellant, owner of land subject to the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, claimed that ceiling proceedings became void after the Act was repealed in 1999 and filed a writ petition in 2002. The Allahabad High Court dismissed the writ on 14 March 2008, finding the appellant …
The petitioners claimed ownership of land in Survey No. 129/45/D, Hyderabad, based on a 1961 compromise decree and a 1962 sale deed in favour of their mother. The State Government had recommended issuance of supplementary sethwars for this parcel. The land had been caught up in urban land ceiling …
The appellants, land‑holders of plots 36‑43 in Survey No. 71, challenged the State of Gujarat's claim that their land had vested in the State under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, on the basis of a handwritten corrigendum and a panchnama. The Supreme Court examined whether such a …
The appellant, Nargis Jal Haradhvala, obtained a Section 20 exemption under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 for a parcel of land in Mumbai, with an initial condition to surrender 30% of the permissible floor space to government‑nominated allottees. A 1990 government corrigendum …
The State of Assam claimed that surplus land, declared under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, had been vested in the government after possession was taken in December 1991, and that the later repeal of the 1976 Act by the 1999 Repeal Act did not affect that vesting. The heirs of …
The case concerned a dispute over 25 acres of land in Hyderabad that had been declared surplus under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. Roudri Co‑operative Housing Society claimed purchase of the land, while hut‑dwellers (encroachers) occupied part of it. The State Human Rights …
The Supreme Court examined an appeal by the Diesel Loco Shed Employees & S.E. Railway Employees House Building Co‑op Society Ltd. challenging a High Court review that set aside orders declaring surplus land vested in the State and the allotment of 6 acres to the society. The Court held that the …
Gajanan Kamlya Patil, a landowner, was served a notice under Section 10(5) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 demanding surrender of possession of his land, with a threat of force if he failed to comply. The notice was issued after the Act had been repealed by the Urban Land …
Godrej & Boyce acquired a 133-acre parcel in Vikhroli, which was declared waste land and cultivated before 1951. The State later issued a show‑cause notice under Section 35(3) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (notice No. WT/53) in 1956‑57, but never served it or took possession, while repeatedly …
The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed against a High Court order that allowed landowner Hari Ram to claim the benefit of the saving clause in the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999. The dispute centered on whether the "deemed vesting" of surplus vacant land under section 10(3) of the …
The Supreme Court examined appeals by Mahalaxmi Co‑operative Housing Society Ltd. against a High Court order that set aside trial‑court orders allowing the society to record a pursis (settlement) under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC in two civil suits concerning land ownership. The Court held that …
The case involved several cooperative housing societies that had purchased flats in a development where the builders constructed additional floors and exceeded the permitted Floor Space Index (FSI) in violation of the sanctioned plan and municipal regulations. The societies sought a mandamus …
The State of Gujarat and the Mamlatdar sought to enforce the Gujarat Agricultural Lands Ceiling Act, 1960 against Manoharsinhji Pradyumansinhji Jadeja, whose 587 acres of land were declared surplus. Jadeja contended that the lands were "urban land" under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, …
The Maharashtra government acquired land for Voltas Ltd. and issued an allotment order in 1969 restricting alienation without prior permission and mandating use for workers' housing. Voltas later obtained an exemption under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, to develop surplus land …
The appellant purchased a plot in 1978 and paid Rs.50,000 as earnest money. The vendors were contractually obliged to obtain sale permission and an Income Tax clearance, but failed to do so within six months, invoking Clause 9 to terminate the agreement and refunding the earnest money. The appellant …
Vinayak Kashinath Shilkar filed a writ petition seeking declaration that proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 concerning his land in Thane were abated after the Repeal Act of 1999 was adopted in Maharashtra on 29‑11‑2007. He contended that, although the land had vested …
The Karnataka State Tourism Development Corporation acquired 37 acres of land for a golf‑cum‑hotel resort under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, but later transferred portions of the land to private entities. Several landowners challenged the acquisition, alleging fraud and diversion of public …
Safiya Bee purchased a house and its adjoining vacant land by a registered sale deed, but the respondent forcibly occupied the property. She filed an application under Section 7‑A of the Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 before the Special Tribunal seeking possession of the house …
The appellant cooperative society entered into an oral agreement in 1974 and a written sale deed in 1976 to purchase land from the first respondent, who later claimed the agreement was cancelled in a public notice dated 3 February 1991. The appellant filed a suit on 11 February 1991 for declaration …
The appellants challenged the validity of the State's allocation of land in Survey No. 83 under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, arguing that the land was agricultural and that the earlier High Court judgments declaring the proceedings void should stand. The Supreme Court examined …
The original landholders, whose holdings exceeded the ceiling under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, were assessed as surplus and transferred a major portion of the land to Mayur Sahkari Awas Samiti in 1982. The Act deemed such surplus land vested in the State, but the authorities …
The appellant, Sulochana Chandrakant Galande, challenged the acquisition of her land by the State under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, arguing that the land was not within urban limits at the Act's commencement and that the later repeal of the Act should invalidate the …
The appellants entered into a contract to purchase a trust property, agreeing to pay an advance and the balance by a stipulated date, with a clause stating that time was the essence of the contract. They later demanded that the respondents obtain clearance from the Endowment Department under the …
Lokprakashan Ltd., a newspaper, applied to Baroda Municipal Corporation for 5,000 sq. m of land. The corporation’s Standing Committee approved the sale, and the Gujarat State Government granted an exemption under section 20 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. After paying Rs 50 …
The case arose from a long‑standing dispute over leasehold lands originally granted to Sowar Ramji Vaity. After a series of agreements, the respondent Kiran Construction Co. (Respondent No.1) sought to enforce a 1982 injunction restraining the Vaity family and others from dealing with the …
The Moradabad Development Authority (MDA) appealed a High Court order that directed it to return surplus land to respondents Saurabh Jain and others and to pay compensation. The land had been declared surplus under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 in 1977, but a 1998 revision by the …
The Andhra Pradesh Housing Board acquired 45 acres for a housing scheme, but could take possession of only 43 acres; the remaining two acres remained occupied by hut dwellers and compensation was never paid. The land‑owners obtained a writ from the High Court declaring the acquisition award for the …
The appellants, land owners, had declared under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 that their land was not surplus because it was already in the possession of the Visakhapatnam Port Trust. The competent authority accepted this and declared them non‑surplus. Subsequent land‑acquisition …
The original owner of 119 acres filed a joint declaration under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 for himself, his wife and three sons, while two daughters filed separate declarations claiming land allotted to them under a family "Pasupu Kumkuma" arrangement. The competent authority …
The respondent, V. Venkateswara Rao, held vacant land in excess of the ceiling limit under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and obtained a 33‑year lease of the land before the prohibition on alienation of vacant land took effect. The State Government granted an exemption under …
The appellants, Ganga Retreat and Towers Ltd., bought a prime property at a public auction on the basis that it was free‑hold, ceiling‑free and had a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 2.0. After paying the full consideration, they obtained possession and applied for building‑plan approval, but the municipal …
The respondents applied to the Secunderabad Cantonment Board for sanction of a layout plan on land they claimed to own. The Board initially returned the plan for lack of an exemption certificate under the Urban Land (Ceiling) Act, but the High Court held that such a certificate was not required. The …
The State of West Bengal appealed against a Calcutta High Court order that granted exemption under Section 20 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and confirmed the sale of a sick company's excess land to a third party, despite pending winding‑up proceedings under the Companies Act, …
The State of Gujarat challenged the validity of the proviso to Rule 81(2) of the Gujarat Land Revenue Rules, 1972 (as amended 1977), which imposed double land‑revenue rates on lands in urban agglomerations covered by the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, if the land was not put to the …
The respondents purchased parcels of land that were agricultural on the appointed day of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and later converted them to residential use after a master plan amendment. They applied to the Hyderabad Urban Development Authority for layout approval, which …
The appellants (vendors) entered into a sale agreement with the respondent (buyer) for Rs.40.25 lakh, conditioning the sale on obtaining clearance under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 by a stipulated date. When the clearance was not obtained, the vendors cancelled the agreement …
The plaintiff entered into an agreement with the original defendant to develop dwelling units for weaker sections under Section 21 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, but possession of the land was never transferred and the agreement contained a clause allowing unilateral …
Solidaire India Ltd. had taken three loans from Fairgrowth Financial Services Ltd. and claimed that the agreed interest rate was 18% per annum. The Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions and Securities) Act, 1992, awarded interest at 21.5% and 23% respectively, which the appellant …
The plaintiff, the legal heirs of the deceased Pravin Jethalal Kamdar, had entered into a sale agreement for his urban land within the ceiling limit and applied for permission under Section 27(1) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The competent authority rejected the application …
The Himachal Pradesh Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972 exempts tea estates from its provisions. Under Section 26 the State Government framed rules in 1973, and in 1986 added a proviso to Rule 3 prohibiting transfer of land subservient to tea plantations without government permission. A 1990 …
The petition challenged the Andhra Pradesh High Court's order that an application for exemption under Section 20(1)(a) or 20(1)(b) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 could be filed even after excess land had been declared and vested in the State under Section 10. The State argued …
The petitioners challenged the insertion of the Gudalur Janmam Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1969 and the West Bengal Land Holding Revenue Act, 1979 into the Ninth Schedule of the Constitution after they had been struck down as unconstitutional. The issue was whether such …
The appellant, a family waqf (Waqf Alai Aulad) created before May 1, 1959, sought exemption from land‑ceiling provisions on the ground that its income was used for charitable and religious purposes as well as for the welfare of the settler’s family. The claim was made under clause (f) of Section …
The appellants, former owners of surplus urban land in Pune, were deemed to possess excess land under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. After objections were rejected, a notification under Section 10(3) was published vesting the surplus land in the State, before the appellants' …
Natwarbhai Magajnbhai Patel filed a Special Leave Petition challenging a Gujarat High Court order that vested excess vacant land, surrendered under Section 10(5) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, in the State. The petitioner argued that compensation should be paid before the …
The petitioner booked a flat in a building constructed on excess vacant land that had been exempted under Section 20(1)(b) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The promoter refused to transfer the flat and the land share, citing a Karnataka High Court order based on the Supreme …
The Government of Andhra Pradesh appealed a judgment that had awarded compensation for urban land of the Nizam acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The land lay within the Hyderabad Urban Agglomeration and had been declared excess under the Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation Act, 1976, …
The appellant, owner of a plot in South Calcutta, entered into a sale agreement with the respondent for Rs 9 lakhs, requiring an initial payment of Rs 25,000 and a further Rs 4 lakhs within five months, the latter being essential for the appellant to obtain alternative accommodation. The respondent …
The appellant, the legal heir of the deceased owner of three plots in Kanpur, challenged the computation of excess urban land under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The plots comprised a dwelling unit on 501.64 sq m and two industrial factories on larger plots. The authorities …
The owner of a plot in Jabalpur applied to the competent authority for permission to alienate 16,500 sq ft of land with building to a purchaser. The authority exercised its option under Section 27(1) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 to purchase the property on behalf of the …
Atia Mohammad Begum owned vacant land in Aligarh that was entered in revenue records as agricultural before the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 came into force on 17‑02‑1976. The competent authority declared the land to be in excess of the ceiling limit, but the District Judge reduced …
The Lala Jeetmal Kapoor Trust, which owned 2071.10 sq. metres of vacant land in Kanpur, was notified for acquisition under the Kanpur Southern City Extension Scheme. The Trust objected, claiming that the layout had been sanctioned, that provisions for roads and a public park were included, and that …
The petitioners, owners of lands in the Hubli‑Dharwad urban agglomeration, challenged the Land Tribunal’s order granting occupancy rights to tenants under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, arguing that the lands fell within the scope of the Central Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and …
The appellant, Smt. Meera Gupta, purchased a vacant plot from Smt. Probhavati Poddar, the predecessor-in-interest, after obtaining a decree for specific performance. The predecessor owned a built‑up property (constructed before the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976) and a vacant plot, …
The appellants owned land that was acquired by the Hubli Dharwar Municipal Corporation for its own purposes. A reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was made to a civil court for determination of compensation, but the court proceeded without serving notice to the corporation …
The case concerned a parcel of land in Bandra, Bombay, originally shown as residential in the 1966 development plan, for which a developer sought permission to build a five‑star hotel. The Municipal Commissioner rejected the plan, citing a pending revision of the development plan that would earmark …
The Gujarat government issued a notification under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to acquire lands for municipal employee housing. After the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (ULCRA) came into force, the landowners filed statements under ULCRA claiming the lands were in excess of the …
The Supreme Court examined several Special Leave Petitions challenging the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973. The petitioners argued that a separated minor son should not be treated as a member of the family unit, that land transferred by such sons before the …
The petitioners, owners of vacant urban land, challenged the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 on grounds that several provisions violated Articles 14, 19(1)(f) and 31(2) of the Constitution and the basic structure doctrine. The Court examined the artificial definition of "family" in …
The Supreme Court examined challenges to the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 (as amended in 1977) on the ground that, after the Parliament enacted the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 under Article 252, the State law became void for being outside …
Bai Dosabhai, who had received two plots of land as a gift, executed a deed of lease in 1946 granting the lessee (Indu Prasad Dev Shankar Bhatt and successors) a right to purchase the land within seven years for a stipulated price, with provisions for rent, default, and sale by public auction. After …
