Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulations) Act, 1976

6 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

AMAL KUMAR GHOSH & ORS.versusBASANTA KUMAR ALMAL

2010 INSC 24928 April 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The first respondent filed a suit for specific performance which was settled by a decree that appointed a court‑appointed receiver to hold the balance sale consideration of Rs.6,00,000. The appellants instructed the receiver to pay Rs.3,00,000 to Park Services Pvt. Ltd. for statutory liabilities and to release the rema

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.versusKARAN SINGH BINAYAK AND ORS.

2002 INSC 16120 March 2002Dismissed

The State of West Bengal sought to revise a 1957 record of rights concerning land that had been leased to a paper mill, arguing that the land vested in the State under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953. The respondents, Karan Singh Binayak and others, had purchased the land and commenced construction after

STATE OF U.PversusNAND KUMAR AGGARWAL AND ORS.

1997 INSC 74119 November 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed against a High Court order that exempted a parcel of land in village Para, Lucknow, from the ceiling provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulations) Act, 1976 on the ground that it was agricultural land. The land was entered as agricultural in revenue records and shown as such i

TULSI CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY, HYDERABAD ETC.versusSTATE OF A.P. AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1999 INSC 39514 September 1999Disposed off

The Tulsi Co‑operative Housing Society had agreed to buy 24 acres of land but the State of Andhra Pradesh, under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, acquired 18.03 acres for a HUDCO housing project, invoking the urgency clause and dispensing with a Section 5A enquiry. The Society and the landowner challenged the acquisitio

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.versusB.E. BILLIMORIA AND ORS.

2003 INSC 39314 August 2003Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra appealed against a Bombay High Court order that had held the respondents, B.E. Billimoria and others, were within the ceiling limit of vacant land in Pune. The respondents jointly owned a 5,428.09‑sq‑m plot in Pune and each owned a flat in a Mumbai co‑operative housing society. The competent an

STATE OF A.P. AND ORS.versusN. AUDIKESAVA REDDY AND ORS.

2001 INSC 5596 November 2001Case Partly allowed

The case concerned the interpretation of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulations) Act, 1976 with respect to whether a master plan existing at the time of the Act's commencement or a later master plan should be used to determine if land is vacant land in excess of the ceiling limit. The State of Andhra Pradesh sought to e

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search