Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Usurious Loans Act, 1918

5 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

N.M. VEERAPPAversusCANARA BANK

1998 INSC 4127 January 1998Appeal(s) allowed

Canara Bank sued a partnership firm and its partners for recovery of a loan secured by an equitable mortgage. The trial court awarded interest at the contractual rate of 16.5% on the balance up to the date of suit and at a reduced rate of 6% per annum for future interest from the date of suit. The Karnataka High Court …

STATE BANK OF INDIAversusYASANGI VENKATESWARA RAO

1999 INSC 2021 January 1999Appeal(s) allowed

State Bank of India filed a suit for recovery of money against Y. Venkateswara Rao, obtaining a preliminary decree in its favour which was upheld by the District Court. After the decree, Section 21-A was inserted into the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 by the Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984, prohibiting courts from re…

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIAversusSHRI KANAIYALAL BALDEVBHAI PATEL

2017 INSC 96320 September 2017Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether non‑intermediary front‑running—where a person receives confidential information about a forthcoming large block trade and trades ahead of it—constitutes a prohibited fraudulent or unfair trade practice under SEBI’s Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Regulations, 2003…

M/S SUNEJA TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.versusANITA MERCHANT

2023 INSC 39118 April 2023Appeal(s) allowed

Anita Merchant booked three flats from Suneja Towers Private Limited, paid 60% of the price, but the builder failed to deliver possession even after the agreed period, leading her to file consumer complaints. The District Forum dismissed the complaints, but the State Consumer Commission reversed the decision, ordering …

JAYANT VERMA & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2018 INSC 15916 February 2018Directions issued

The petition challenged the constitutional validity of Section 21A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, which bars courts from reopening bank loan transactions on the ground of excessive interest. The petitioners argued that the provision violated Article 14 and undermined State Debt Relief Acts that provide relief to …

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search