Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
7 judgments · newest first · showing 1–7
The Supreme Court examined whether determining the conditions of service of officers and employees of the Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad (the Board) is a statutory function of the Board under the 1965 Act. It held that the power to fix service conditions vests in the Board and can be …
The Supreme Court considered Special Leave Petitions filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad challenging High Court orders that applied the 6th Pay Commission benefits to the Parishad’s employees. The core dispute revolved around the earlier judgment in …
Maharaji Educational Trust, U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad and HUDCO appealed against a Lucknow High Court order that directed the Parishad to demarcate 42.45 acres of mortgaged land and to declare 21 acres as unencumbered, based on a sale agreement with SGS Construction. The Supreme Court held that …
The Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad (Vikas Parishad), a statutory housing corporation, sought to replace its contributory provident fund with a pension/family pension and gratuity scheme for its employees. After receiving conditional approval from the State Government in 1996, the State later …
The Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad (Parishad) acquired land under its 1965 Adhiniyam and awarded compensation through a Special Land Acquisition Officer. Claimants dissatisfied with the award approached a reference court, which enhanced compensation, solatium and interest, and awarded …
The Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad issued a notification under Section 28 of the 1965 Adhiniyam on 7 June 1982 and later obtained Government approval on 24 August 1982, followed by a declaration under Section 32 on 28 February 1987. Friends Cooperative Housing Society filed a writ petition …
The Uttar Pradesh Awas Evam Vikas Parishad (the Board), a statutory body acquiring land for a housing scheme, was not impleaded in the compensation proceedings before the tribunal and the High Court. The land owners challenged the compensation awarded, leading to enhanced awards by the High Court, …
