Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
7 judgments · newest first · showing 1–7
The revisionists challenged the Sessions Judge’s orders rejecting their discharge application and framing charges of attempt to commit culpable homicide (Sec. 110 BNS) and related offences. They argued that the injuries were simple, not grievous, and that a separate FIR lodged by a victim undermined …
The applicant filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking quash of the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 333 and 109(1) of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. Act. The parties had reached a genuine compromise, which was verified by the trial …
Alok Sahani applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 711 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 318(4), 351(3), 352, 61(2) of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. Act and Sections 66(C), 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. The court noted that a co‑accused, Vinay Sahani, had already been released …
Phool Prakash applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 362 of 2026) charged under Sections 318(2) and 61(2) of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. Act and Sections 8, 10, 11, 13(3) and 13(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Public Examination Act. The High Court examined the facts, the evidence, and the submissions …
Petitioner Sabir filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 11‑07‑2026 under Sections 74, 352 and 351(3) of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. Act and a direction that he not be arrested. The petitioner’s counsel requested that, before any arrest, the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code for an accused, Savita, who was charged under Section 108 of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. Act for allegedly abetting the suicide of her husband. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged six months …
Navalkishor Garg, an 80‑year‑old man, was charged under several sections of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. Act and Section 66‑D of the Information Technology Act for allegedly receiving an excess pension of Rs. 22,08,285, of which Rs. 4,96,000 had already been recovered. The applicant filed a second bail …
