Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
7 judgments · newest first · showing 1–7
Ganesh Kashyap filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 30‑07‑2026 under Sections 69, 351(3) and 352 of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. and Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, and also sought mandamus to restrain his arrest and any coercive …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Archana Devi under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case (Crime No. 177 of 2026) where she was alleged to have threatened an informant. The applicant argued that she was falsely implicated, had no role …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rohit Kumar under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with FIR No. 195 of 2026 alleging false promise of marriage and related offences under the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu, accused in a case under Sections 309(6), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5) and 3(5) of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S., relating to alleged assault and theft of a mobile phone. The applicant’s counsel argued that the FIR did not name him, that the IMEI …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained a criminal revision filed by Juvenile X, aged 17 years 11 months, seeking bail after being detained since August 2024. The revision challenged the order of the Child Court/Additional Sessions Judge, Banda, which had denied bail under Section 12 of the Juvenile …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Tanu in a case under Sections 338, 336(3), 340(2), 318(4) and 61(2) of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S., alleging forgery of GST invoices and revenue loss. The applicant contended that he was not named in the FIR, had no prior criminal record, …
The applicant, Lakhan Lal, was charged under Section 109 of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. for allegedly causing a gun‑shot injury to a 14‑year‑old boy during a marriage celebration. He claimed innocence, arguing that the injury resulted from celebratory firing and that the FIR was lodged fifteen days …
