Uttar Pradesh Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981

The Supreme Court examined challenges to the Uttar Pradesh government's decision to fix minimum qualifying marks of 65% for General and 60% for reserved candidates in the 2019 Assistant Teacher Recruitment Examination (ATRE-2019) after the exam had been conducted, and to allow B.Ed. candidates to participate in the sel…

The Supreme Court examined the eligibility criteria for the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) under the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) guidelines, specifically the meaning of the term “pursuing” in clause 5(ii). The petitioners, who had been appointed as Assistant Teachers while still enrolled in a Teacher …

The appellant, an Assistant Teacher born on 1 July 1943, claimed a "session benefit" under Rule 29 of the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981, arguing that his retirement on 1 July 2003 entitled him to continue service until 30 June 2004. The Supreme Court held that a person attains a specified…

The Uttar Pradesh Government issued a circular on 11 August 1997, under the Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981, stipulating that only candidates trained in state government institutes and holding a Basic Teacher Certificate (BTC) or its equivalents could be appointed as Assistant Teachers in primary schools…

The petitioners, U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad, challenged the seniority of a group of teachers who had been appointed as untrained temporary Assistant Teachers between 1959 and 1966 and later obtained training certificates. The teachers argued that their seniority should be counted from the date of their initial appoint…

Ramesh Singh, the District Basic Education Officer, appointed 521 assistant teachers without the mandatory recommendation of a Selection Committee as required by Rules 16 and 19(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education (Teachers) Service Rules, 1981. The State suspended him and, under the Uttar Pradesh Civil Service (Di…