Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1965

10 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

U.P.S.E.B. AND ANRversusSANT KABIR SAHAKARI KATAI MILLS LTD.

2005 INSC 42919 September 2005Disposed off

The Uttar Pradesh State Electricity Board (UPSEB), a public sector undertaking, entered into supply agreements with several cooperative societies registered under the Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1965. Disputes arose over the rates charged and alleged failure to provide uninterrupted power, leading the All

U.P. STATE CO-OPERATIVE LAND DEVELOPMENT BANK LTD.versusCHANDRA BHAN DUBEY AND ORS.

1998 INSC 48918 December 1998Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined three disciplinary dismissals of employees of the Uttar Pradesh State Co‑operative Land Development Bank Ltd. (the Bank). The High Court had held that the Bank was not an "authority" under Article 12 and that the dismissals violated natural‑justice rules, setting aside the orders. The Supreme

GHAZIABAD ZILA SAHAKARI BANK LTD.versusADDL. LABOUR COMMISSIONER& ORS.

2007 INSC 4817 January 2007Appeal(s) allowed

Ghaziabad Zila Sahakari Bank Ltd., a cooperative society, paid ex‑gratia amounts to its employees in violation of circulars issued by the Registrar of Cooperative Societies. The employees filed an application under Section 6H of the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, and the Additional Labour Commissioner (ALC) ord

STATE OF UP AND ANR. ETC.versusC.O.D. CHHEOKI EMPLOYEES' CO-OP SOCIETY LTD. AND ORS. ETC.

1997 INSC 4017 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh challenged provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 and the 1968 Rules that reserve seats for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes and women in the Committee of Management of co‑operative societies, arguing that the reservation and nomination powe

U.P. CO-OP. SPG. MILLS FEDERATION LIMITED AND ANRversusRAM PRATAP YADAV AND ORS.

2007 INSC 10095 October 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, U.P. Co‑op. Spinning Mills Federation Ltd., had dismissed its Secretary/General Manager, Ram Pratap Yadav, for serious financial irregularities. Yadav challenged the dismissal, arguing that under Regulation 87 of the Uttar Pradesh Co‑operative Societies Employees Service Regulations, 1975, prior concurre

THE RECOVERY OFFICER, LAKHIMPUR AND ORS.versusSMT. RAVINDRA KAUR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 14354 December 1996Dismissed

The Recovery Officer, under the Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1965, initiated recovery proceedings under Section 91 to attach and sell the lands of members who had defaulted on loans taken for seeds and manure. The members contended that the statutory charge created by Section 39(a) attaches only to the cro

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, LUCKNOWversusBAZPUR CO-OPERATIVE SUGAR FACTORY LTD.

1989 INSC 1601 May 1989Appeal(s) allowed

The Bazpur Co-operative Sugar Factory Ltd., a cooperative society, required its producer‑shareholders to deposit amounts into a 'Loss Equalisation & Capital Redemption Reserve Fund' under a bye‑law. The deposits were used for the society’s business, including converting partly paid shares to fully paid shares and repay

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search