Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
9 judgments · newest first · showing 1–9
The petitioners sought a review of the High Court's order dismissing their writ petition concerning a title dispute over land claimed on the basis of a registered sale deed. They alleged that the consolidation officer and subsequent appellate authorities had acted arbitrarily, failed to give them a …
Shiv Kumar Singh filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to the Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Mathura, to decide Appeal No. 183 of 2024 filed under Section 11(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, which had been pending for a long time. The petitioner argued that …
Petitioners Doodh Nath and others filed a writ petition seeking certiorari to quash three orders dated 4‑Jan‑1997, 30‑Jul‑1999 and 31‑Dec‑1999 passed by the Consolidation Officer, and mandamus directing respondents not to disturb their peaceful possession of land (Araji No. 299). The High Court …
The petitioner, Dayaram, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Mirzapur, to decide a pending recall application (RST/1087/2025) filed under Section 48 of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act. The petitioner argued that the authority had …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Kirtapur, Jaunpur (respondent No.2) to decide a stay application dated 27.01.2026, filed in Appeal No. 147/2024-25 under Section 21(2) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, within a …
The petitioners, Rajveer and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus to compel the State of U.P. and district authorities to correct land revenue records in accordance with an order dated 05.07.2016 under Section 9A(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act and …
The appellant, Mazhar Hassan, purchased land from decree holders who had obtained a decree of eviction against the respondents under Section 209 of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act. The decree holders' execution application was dismissed as time‑barred, after which the …
Kishan Singh's agricultural land was allotted under the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act and the allotment became final under section 23. After Kishan's death, Malkhan Singh claimed to be his adopted son to inherit the land, while other claimants denied the adoption. The consolidation …
The ex‑Zamindars of a village claimed that lands given on Theka to the respondents in 1948 became their exclusive Sir and Khudkasht and should be recorded as Bhoomidars after the Zamindari vested under the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. The respondents contended that …
