Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
20 judgments · newest first · showing 1–20
The applicant, Nadeem, filed a bail application in a case under Sections 2(b)(1)(17) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging false implication based on a gang chart and citing prior bail in two other criminal matters. He had been in custody …
Javed Khan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 906 of 2026) under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, citing a gang chart and noting that he had already been granted bail in two …
Palturam Nagar applied for bail in a case filed under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and had already been granted bail in a related gang‑chart case. He had been in custody …
The applicant, Akash Tiwari, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he had been falsely implicated due to police rivalry and had no prior criminal record aside from …
The applicant, Mohit, was arrested in Crime No. 555 of 2026 under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, and has been in custody since 5 August 2026. He contended that the prosecution was based on a single entry in a gang chart, that he had …
The applicant, Abhishek Prajapati, filed a bail application under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, seeking release while his trial (Crime No. 172 of 2026) is pending. He contended that the case was based on a single entry in a gang chart, …
The applicants, Arjun Kumar Balmiki and Ankit Kumar Balmiki, sought bail under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, while their trial was pending. They argued that they had already been granted bail in related criminal cases and would not …
The applicant, Oviash @ Ka, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 775 of 2025) filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He claimed that his inclusion in the case was based on a gang chart that incorrectly linked him to a single …
The applicant, Intzar, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 374 of 2026) under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on police rivalry, that he is not a gang member, and that he …
The applicant, Akhand Pratap Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of an FIR and charge sheet registered under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the FIR failed to …
The applicant, Mustkeem, filed a bail application in a case (Crime No. 229 of 2026) under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that he was falsely implicated due to police rivalry and is not a gang member. He had already been …
Rahat applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.274 of 2025) under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on a single case shown in a gang chart for which he had already been granted bail, and …
The applicant, Devideen Prajapati, filed a bail application under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, seeking release while his trial (Crime No. 179 of 2026) is pending. He contended that the prosecution was based on three earlier cases in …
The applicant, Saddam, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging that the charges were based on police rivalry and that he had no criminal history. He had been in custody since 15 …
Monu Bharti applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 366 of 2025) under the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, invoking sections 2(b)(i), 2(b)(xi) and 3(1). He contended that the prosecution was based on police rivalry, that he is not a gang member, and …
The applicant, Prakash Rajpoot, filed a bail application in a case registered as Crime No.154 of 2025 under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the charges were based on police rivalry, that he had already been granted bail …
Arbaj applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 385 of 2026, which is filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant contended that the prosecution was based on a single criminal case shown in a gang chart for which he had …
The applicant, Shahnawaz, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the prosecution was based on five other criminal cases in which he had already been granted bail and that …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Vinayak Malviya, who was arrested under Sections 2(b)(1) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, in Crime No.13 of 2026. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated and that only …
The applicant Ramlakhan Jaiswal filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a notice dated 22‑01‑2026 issued by the District Magistrate under Section 14(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, alleging attachment of his property on …
