Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act

22 judgments · newest first · showing 1–22

SALMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Salma, who was arrested in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

PRASHANT BAGHGELversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Prashant Baghel, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended …

RAVISHANKARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Ravishankar who was arrested in a case under Sections 2/3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false implication, …

SHIVA SISODIYA @ SHIVA RANA @ HARSH SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Shiva Sisodiya, who was arrested in a case under Section 2/3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

MUKESH NISHADversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mukesh Nishad, who was arrested in a case registered under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

NIRANJAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Niranjan Singh, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2/3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false …

HIMANSHU @ PIYUSH @ BHANJA @ KATTAR BANIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for an accused in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely …

TASLEEMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Tasleem, was arrested in Crime No. 49 of 2026 under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act and has been in custody since 27 March 2026, claiming he was falsely implicated. He contended that he is already on bail in a …

ANKIT RANAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ankit Rana, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

DEEPAKversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Deepak, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed …

YOGESH KUMAR GUPTA @ BHOLAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Yogesh Kumar Gupta, who was arrested in a case registered under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

SABIRversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sabir, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant asserted that …

AKASH KOSTHAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Akash Kostha who was arrested in a case under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false implication, …

MOHD SAIF @ MOHD ANJAAN @ BABLUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Mohd Saif, who is charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely …

ANKIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Ankit Kumar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed …

INTZAR @ MOTAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Intzar @ Mota, who was arrested in a case under Sections 2/3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted …

RAKESH SHAKYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Rakesh Shakya was arrested in connection with Crime No. 49 of 2025 under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. He filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, asserting false implication and noting that …

KISHAN PAL @ PUNCHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Kishan Pal @ Punch, who was arrested in a case under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false …

SANDEEPversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Sandeep, who is accused under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed false implication, had …

ABHISHEK SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Abhishek Sharma, who was arrested in Crime No. 4 of 2024 under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant …

NEERAJ KUMAR MAURYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Neeraj Kumar Maurya, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release while facing charges under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. He claimed innocence, asserted that …

BABLOO RATHORE @ BABLOO @ GOLDIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Babloo Rathore, who was charged under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …